Momentum

Momentum

When I first encountered the 30/20/50 theory, I was just starting my career in management. It quickly became a cornerstone of my personal management philosophy.

Here’s how the theory breaks down:

  • 30% of your workforce is deeply committed to their jobs. These individuals consistently go above and beyond, maintain positive attitudes, rarely complain, and often rise quickly through the ranks. They are your "go-to" people.
  • 20% of your workforce represents the opposite end of the spectrum. These individuals are often dissatisfied, see the negative in most situations, and feel that nothing is ever good enough. They are frequent complainers and typically the first to clock out at the end of the day.
  • 50% of your workforce falls in the middle. This group is content to fulfill their responsibilities without seeking extra effort or attention. Their behavior often aligns with where they perceive management's focus to be.

The challenge for management lies in concentrating on the 30% who are driving success, rather than expending energy trying to change the 20% who are resistant. Focusing too much on the 20% can be detrimental; it can cause the 50% to take notice of the attention being given to the negative group, potentially leading them to adopt similar attitudes and behaviors. This shift can result in an unhealthy environment where up to 70% of your workforce becomes disengaged. If this negativity persists, not only does your business suffer, but your top performers (the 30%) may feel undervalued and start looking elsewhere for opportunities.

On the other hand, by focusing on and rewarding the efforts of your star performers, the 50% group is more likely to emulate their positive behavior. A common question arises: "Why not simply eliminate the 20% and create a perfect team?" The theory suggests that this balance is inevitable—if you remove the 20%, someone from the 50% may disagree with the decision, eventually becoming disillusioned and sliding into the 20% group. Over time, they may even recruit others to their negative viewpoint.

This doesn't mean you should ignore the concerns of the 20%. It's important to be fair, consider their feedback, and make necessary changes when justified. However, the key takeaway is to focus on what is working and the people who make it work, rather than getting bogged down by negativity.

Lastly, this can apply to any group of people—whether in communities, teams, families, or organizations.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jeremy Melting的更多文章

  • Refer vs. Repost

    Refer vs. Repost

    Do you repost job seekers that are open to work with: ~Sharing for reach ~Reposting for visibility ~Know anyone who…

    3 条评论
  • Behind the Scenes

    Behind the Scenes

    One of the most common complaints I hear about recruiters is, “I had one call or interview, and then I never heard from…

    5 条评论
  • Applicant Woes

    Applicant Woes

    A personal acquaintance of mine recently applied for the same job with four different competing companies. All four…

    2 条评论
  • Hiring Plan

    Hiring Plan

    What is your hiring plan for 2022? How is your company finding candidates to interview for your open jobs? What job…

  • 364 Licks

    364 Licks

    How many licks does it take to reach the center of a Tootsie Pop? That was the question asked in the popular television…

  • Competitive Hiring

    Competitive Hiring

    The difficulty to secure top talent has become the most challenging it’s ever been. Some of the compounding variables…

    3 条评论
  • Reference Checks

    Reference Checks

    When it comes to reference checks, there are substantial legal restrictions on the use and communication of…

    3 条评论
  • Offer Letters

    Offer Letters

    A best tactic to secure top talent is once you know who you want to hire, extend the offer letter. Common sense? Yes…

  • Remote Employees

    Remote Employees

    With the recent shift of companies offering remote/work from home options, organizations have become more competitive…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了