Is the modern-day BMW sport coupe too big and heavy to be sporty?

Is the modern-day BMW sport coupe too big and heavy to be sporty?

This morning I'm writing a review on a 2016 BMW M6 Coupe that I borrowed from the manufacturer for a weeklong test recently, and after doing some research that involved collecting dimensions and curb weight info I began to wonder how it measured up to the old 8 Series Coupe. 

As some of my friends and colleagues here on LinkedIn will remember, the original BMW 8 Series was heavily criticized for its overall size and curb weight, its tendency to understeer when pushed hard something I remember quite well, especially with the big V12 under its hood. This said I found it interesting that the big and weighty 850Ci was actually smaller than the current 6 Series and not much heavier even with that V12 installed at 1,975 kilos (4,354 lbs) compared to 1,939 kg (4,275 lbs) for the U.S.-spec twin-turbo V8-powered 650i Coupe. Today's 650i xDrive Coupe, however, is a daunting 2,000 kilos (4,410 lbs)! That’s 25 kg (55 lbs) more than the original 850i, but before we start trying to directly compare the two let’s remember that BMW has come a very long way with chassis engineering, powertrain and driveline performance since the ‘90s. 

Even the comparatively lightweight 1,815-kilo (4,001-lb) 2016 640i has more muscle within its turbocharged straight-six than the old 850i's V12 at 315 horsepower compared to 296. Sure the 850Ci would eventually increase its output to 322 horsepower and finally 375 in 850CSi trim, but once it was made available a great deal more 8 Series buyers purchased the 282-horsepower 840Ci that was arguably the better driver due to just 1,830 kg (4,030 lbs) of total mass, albeit underpowered by today's standards. The new 640i offers the better power to weight ratio and the new 6’s overall balance would easily put the old 8 Series to shame.  

As for size, you may also find it difficult to believe that the new 6 is significantly larger than that 8 Series, the now classic M1-inspired two-door measuring just 4,780 millimetres (188 inches) long with a 2,685-mm (105.7-inch) wheelbase, 1,854 mm (73.0 inches) wide and 1,341 mm (52.8 inches) tall for a particularly elegant shape even by today’s standards, whereas the new 6 has been stretched to 4,897 mm (192.8 inches) in length with a 2,850-mm (112.2-inch) wheelbase, 1,902 mm (74.8 inches) wide and a height of 1,369 mm (53.9 inches). That’s growth of 117 mm (4.6 inches) from nose to tail and 48 mm (1.9 inches) from side to side. 

Such is the state of the modern luxury sports coupe; mega mass overcome by the technical prowess of active suspension elements, additional ABS-sourced electronic drive systems, turbocharged and direct-injected V8 power, and the list of techno wizardry goes on. Fortunately the 2016 M6 Coupe is no larger than the other 6 Series Coupes, whereas it actually weighs less than some at just 1,928 kilos (4,250 lbs) thanks to its awe-inspiring carbon fibre roof panel, which has the added benefits of lowering the car’s centre of gravity while looking downright dreamy. This isn’t the only CFRP addition either, its stunning interior  is filled with the shiny grey composite. 

So tell me? Does knowing this make you long for one of the new 6 Series Coupes or do you find yourself pining for an old 8 Series instead? Or maybe something lighter yet? An original M6 or 635i? Or possibly the beautiful 3.0 CS coupe is part of your dream garage? There's something wonderful about simple, light and agile, although it's quite another experience to harness yourself to a 560-horsepower super coupe that's capable of performance feats unfathomable decades ago. As always, I'd like to know your thoughts and your experiences ... 

Trevor Hofmann

Senior Marketing Specialist, Writer, Editor (specializing in Automotive and Horology)

9 年

I understand your point about performance cars and weight, craig, but having recently finished a stint in a 2015 Challenger Scat Pack Shaker (https://bit.ly/1O9b9o2), which was brilliant fun but also an unwieldy beast, plus I've also driven many other SRT-tuned Challengers over the years, once doing circles around Willow Springs back to back which was followed up by stints in SRT-tuned Chargers that were much better balanced, I wouldn't want to use it as an example of an ideal road car, even with the Hellcat's extra power. It's also half the price of the M6, so less is expected. As for the Model S, it's a big sport sedan and a lightweight compared to some brilliantly balanced Bentleys I've enjoyed, but probably not the best comparo to a BMW sport coupe either. I think we're all in agreement regarding the E9, a car that still drives wonderfully, while I'm also a big fan of the E31 stylistically, but by BMW standards it truly was a pig to drive in stock trim. BMW now owns a carbon fibre plant currently used for its i3 and i8 (and possibly M coupe roofs and other trim bits, I'm not sure), so its quite possible we'll see much lighter M super coupes in the future. Let's keep our collective fingers crossed...

回复
craig parslow

Design Draftsman at Natpro

9 年

Considering the Dodge Challenger Hellcat weighs in at 4469 lbs., and the Tesla Model S weighs 4647 lbs., it may not be out of line. I, for one, do miss the 1990's E31 8-series, as it was a true pillarless hardtop, as was the earlier E9 2800CS/3.0CS.

回复
Scott Black

Owner, TimePiece Public Relations & Marketing

9 年

Of all the BMW cars, the 6 series is my least favorite. While its styling is very appealing, the car has always felt ponderous. I prefer the lighter cars much more than this BMW.

回复
Mark Gold

Co-Founder at Gold Rush Cookie Company

9 年

I'm not a fan of how much BMW's have grown in size. Thank goodness for the 2-series, and it's more sensible proportions. That said, even that has grown in size over the 1-series it replaces. I realize that BMW has worked hard to reduce weight, increase power and efficiency, but enough is enough already! The 6-series is a boat, the 3/4-series is the size of the old E39 5-series and the 2-series is the size of then E36 3-series. When is the madness going to end? With as advanced as technology has come with regards to manufacturing, why hasn't anyone come up with a way to have a car with the size, weight and greenhouse of older cars like the E9, E30 and E28? BMW cabins have become so isolated from the world outside that engine sounds have to be piped in, and cameras and blind spot monitors have to be added because outward visibility is so poor.

回复
James F.

Automobile & Motorsport Aficionado

9 年

A double-edged sword really isn't it. On the one hand, today's performance M series BMW's offer a level of build quality, technology and safety features earlier models such as the 8-series could only dream about yet at the same time, offer a digital driving experience compared to the analogue experience of say a classic E24 M6 . Also on the minus side for today's driving enthusiasts, the modern models do feel their extra weight and lack the scalpel sharp precision, nimbleness, feel and sheer delicate balance that BMW built their reputation on. If I were to buy a new BMW today, my ideal choice would be for the rare and discreet Alpina variants. Certainly in Europe, these combine the perfect blend of increased, discreet mechanical and visual muscle and the proverbial "dream car garage" would also include some classic BMW's such as the M1, 3.0 CSL, M3 Sport Evolution, E28 M5 and Alpina's such as the E24 B7, B6 3.5S and B12 5.7 coupe. Still, that's not to take anything away from the current BMW offerings, no question they have a lot to offer on several levels, you simply pay your money and make your choice based on your personal preferences, taste and priorities.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Trevor Hofmann的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了