Mobile App Attribution

In today’s hyper-competitive, data-driven world, understanding what drives user engagement is the holy grail for app marketers. This is where mobile app attribution steps in—a powerful tool that not only tracks the journey of users from ad interaction to app installation but also uncovers their behavior within the app. But how does this granular approach work and how does it align with methodologies like Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA), which are revolutionizing digital marketing as a whole? Let’s dive in to explore the parallels and insights.

What is Mobile App Attribution?

Mobile app attribution tracks a user’s journey, from interacting with ads to installing the app, and continues to monitor their post-install actions within the app. These post-install actions vary based on the app’s nature. For example:

• In a gaming app, it might track metrics such as time spent, levels cleared, and in-app purchases.
• In a shopping app, it could include metrics like the number of products added to the cart, product views, and time spent browsing.

By analyzing these insights, marketers can determine which channels and campaigns deliver the best ROI, enabling smarter budget allocation and campaign optimization.

How does Mobile Attribution works?

When a user clicks on a mobile ad or engages with a marketing campaign, this action generates a unique tracking link or identifier with information such as device type, location, campaign name and placement of the event. Mobile attribution uses this identifier and an SDKs (Software Development Kit) to collect and process the user data.Once the data is received, app installations are matched to the click events using techniques such as Fingerprinting or Device ID matching.

Device ID Matching

• It is a deterministic approach that uses unique identifiers assigned by mobile operating systems to individual devices known as Device ID.
• Most common Device IDs are IDFA (Identity for Advertisers) for iOS and GAID(Google Advertiser Id) for Android. Device IDs are highly accurate and provide a direct match to the user.
• With the raise in privacy regulations, users are provided with the option to disable Device ID making it difficult to track the events data.

Fingerprinting

• It is a probabilistic approach which is considered as a backup method in the absence of device id.
• It creates a "fingerprint" of the user's device by piecing together various attributes such as IP address, device type, time zone to form a unique identifier.
• Since, this is a probabilistic approach, it will be difficult to accurately match the event data to a user.
• Even with these drawbacks, Fingerprinting is considered as a reliable method in the absence of device id.

In response to ever-increasing privacy regulations, Aggregated Privacy Attribution is emerging as a cutting-edge framework for marketers. Unlike traditional methods that rely on individual-level data, this new approach focuses on extracting insights from aggregated data, ensuring compliance with privacy standards.

Why Does Mobile App Attribution Matter?

Mobile app attribution provides answers to critical marketing questions, such as:

• Which channels drive new customer acquisitions?
• What are our best-performing campaigns?
• How can we effectively retarget churned users?
• Which ads or campaigns are underperforming?
• How can we dynamically allocate marketing budgets for maximum ROI?

Mobile App Attribution vs. Multi-Touch Attribution

While both mobile app attribution and multi-touch attribution (MTA) aim to measure the effectiveness of marketing efforts, they operate in distinct ways and serve different purposes. Here’s a breakdown of their similarities and differences:

Similarities:

• Both methodologies aim to identify which marketing effort is driving the customers and to plan campaigns based on the insights generated.
• Both methodologies are data driven and rely on the user data to measure the performance of marketing channels.
• Both methodologies uses metrics such as ROI, conversion rates and click through ratio to assess channel or campaign effectiveness.
• Both methodologies can handle multi channel driven marketing efforts with some difference in capabilities.
• Both methodologies are facing limitations with raise in privacy regulations and walled gardens.
• Mobile attribution has to deal with more users opting out of Device ID matching and MTA has to transition away from cookie tracking after Google decided to phase out cookies.

Differences:

• Mobile attribution focuses on mobile app campaigns where as MTA can cover customer journey across all digital and offline media.
• In general, Mobile attribution uses First click or Last touch attribution methods to assign credit whereas MTA uses sophisticated algorithm based methods to assign credit among the events.
• Mobile attribution covers user journey across a single device whereas MTA can track events from all digital points and devices.
• Mobile attribution has a relatively simple setup whereas MTA setup is complex as it as integrations to collect data from different platforms and channels.
• Mobile attribution is mainly used by app marketers to optimize app campaigns whereas MTA is used by broader marketing teams to evaluate overall marketing performance.

Conclusion:

Mobile app attribution and multi-touch attribution (MTA) are both indispensable tools in marketing world. Mobile app attribution shines in delivering app-specific insights, enabling marketers to optimize user acquisition, engagement, and retention within the mobile ecosystem. On the other hand, MTA provides a holistic view of the customer journey across multiple touchpoints, helping teams evaluate and refine overall marketing performance.

?? Privacy regulations and evolving technology are reshaping the landscape of mobile app attribution and MTA. How is your team navigating these changes? Share your experiences, challenges, or insights in the comments.

#MobileAttribution #MutliTouchAttribution #MarketingAttribution #MarketingAnalytics