MLflow Alternatives for Data Version Control: DVC vs. MLflow
Introducing MLflow?and DVC
MLflow?is a framework that plays an essential role in any end-to-end machine learning lifecycle. It helps to track your ML experiments, including tracking your models, model parameters, datasets, and hyperparameters and reproducing them when needed.?MLflow ?provides a packaging format for reproducible runs on any platform and then sends models to your choice of deployment tools.
You can also record runs, organize them into experiments, and log additional data using the MLflow Tracking API and UI.
Recommended Reading:?How to use MLflow to Track and Structure ML Projects?
It has various valuable components while monitoring processes like model training, storing the models, loading them to the production, and creating a pipeline.
These components include:
Data Version Control(DVC)?is an open-source version control system used in machine learning projects. It is also known as Git for ML. It deals with data versions rather than code versions.?DVC ?helps you to deal with large models and data files that cannot be handled using Git. It allows you to store information about different versions of your data to track the ML data properly and access your model’s performance later. You can define a remote repository to push your data and models, granting easy collaboration across team members.
To get the desired result, users do not have to manually remember which data model uses which dataset and what actions were conducted; this is all handled by DVC. It consists of a bundle of tools and processes that track changing versions of data and collections of previous data. The DVC repositories contain the files that are under the effect of the version control system. A classified state is maintained for each change that is committed to any data file.
DVC consists of a bundle of tools and processes that track changing versions of data and collections of previous data.
MLflow and DVC usage
MLflow
The machine learning project lifecycle has improved itself with time. Previously, the main focus was on enhancing the prediction power of ML algorithms, but now developers also pay attention to managing their ML project lifecycle effectively. This includes sharing them outside the data science teams where the users are not the same as those who developed it, assuring the reproducibility of results and reducing the gap between data scientists and the operations team.
So, who can handle all this at once? MLflow is the answer. This?MLOps tool ?adds significance to your ML lifecycle. It provides a dynamic way to simplify and expand the deployment of machine learning models by tracking, reproducing, managing, and deploying models in software development. Packaging the models irrespective of the framework and programming language used is taken care of using MLflow. Model management and experient tracking can effectively be handled using MLflow.
It brings transparency and standardization to the table when training, tuning and deploying your ML models. Following are the components of MLflow that are playing their part in the ML process:
Recommended Reading:?MLflow Best Practices
Data Version Control (DVC)
Data tracking is a necessary thing for any data science workflow. Still, it becomes difficult for data scientists to manage and track the datasets. So there is a need for data versioning, which can be achieved using DVC. DVC is one of the convenient tools that can be used for your data science projects. Here are some of the reasons to use DVC:
领英推荐
Weighing the pros and cons
MLflow
Advantages
Following are the advantages of MLflow:
Disadvantages
Following are some of the disadvantages of MLflow:
Data Version Control(DVC)
Advantages
Following are the advantages of Data Version Control:
Recommended Reading:?The importance of Version Control in ML
Disadvantages
How best to use MLflow and DVC?
We had already discussed various points about the features, pros, and cons of DVC and MLflow, now the question arises, what is the best way to use them. So, DVC and MLflow are not mutually exclusive. DVC is used for datasets, while MLflow is used for ML lifecycle tracking.?
The flow goes like this; you use the data coming from the MLflow Git repository along with the code, and then you initialize the local repository with Git and DVC. It will track your data set. On the other hand, Git will follow the data set that DVC produces, then push the dataset to remote storage. And if you want to access the executive version of the data with your code, you can use the DVC API. And you will track the details about the dataset along with the metrics of our model with MLflow. You can use them together to achieve the reproducibility of your project as a whole.
Recommended Reading:?Why is DVC Better Than Git and Git-LFS in Machine Learning Reproducibility
Here are some more tips for working with MLflow,?
Be sure to make MLflow logging optional by building a simple logging switch into your code. This will avoid putting a load of incomplete or empty runs in your MLflow project when debugging. Every MLflow run captures the git hash to keep the code version tracked. However, it would be best to commit all code updates before tracking an experiment to ensure consistency.
This article was first published on Censius and shared here because it’s awesome.?