The Misunderstanding of Employability

The Misunderstanding of Employability

Is ‘employability’ the new mantra used by corporates to demand conformity?

 It would appear so, if you look at the number of corporate recruiters advising freshers in campuses to become and/or stay employable. It is a promise that lot of the ‘candidates’ find very attractive. The price they pay? Do more of what the company wants you do. Be more like what employers like you to be like.

 Corporates are telling vulnerable freshers: “If you want to be employable, this is what you should do: research and learn more about our company before you come in for the interview; think through some innovative things that you would recommend we do; show keenness to join us; ask intelligent questions about our company’s future plans.”.

 ‘Employability’ as a word seems has been truly and completely hijacked by the corporates.

 There is an orchestrated campaign in the press about how many of our engineers are not employable. Universities have been blamed for the curriculum as well as the lax standards in awarding grades. This is a blatant attempt to recruit educational institutions as co-conspirators to produce grads who will be ready to do the company’s bidding from Day One. Using recruitment to bully educational institutions is scare mongering.

 As per usage, the word employability has completely different connotations for the hiring company and for the ‘candidate’ employee. For the organisation, employability means the ability to deploy the ‘willing’ resource in the most suitable part of the company, to become as hugely productive as possible, in the shortest possible time.

For the employee, employability means having skill sets that will give them the opportunity to present oneself as an attractive candidate to as many companies as possible.

He/She would like to showcase multiple skills to have multiple companies wooing them.

 These two interpretations of employability can be contradictory, with the employee and the company pulling in opposite directions. Either way, when one of them buys into the other’s definition, the relationship between the employee and the company is bound to turn sour, once they discover each other’s expectations from employability.

 However, the possibility of this rift with the company is likely only for the brighter employees, the ones who bring genuine value to the job, through rare, high quality and specialised skills. Once the company’s definition and expectation from being employable is known, most of the ‘also-ran’ employees with ‘vanilla’ skill sets will simply settle down and comply with whatever the company wants from them. The Empire wins again!

 There is a vicious war out there for good talent. This is a great opportunity for those with high quality skills, good attitudes, reasonably competent inter-personal/team behaviours and a willingness to learn anything and everything that will propel them towards who they want to become.

It is important for good and talented people to stick steadfast to their own definition of, and requirement from, employability.

 The good candidates need to stay focused on their own vision, goals, pace of acquiring appropriate knowledge and demand that the organisation give them plenty of opportunities to showcase and build on their talents. At any given time, a good candidate should know his/her market worth. They should be confident of landing a job that will take them faster towards their goals, without breaking a sweat. They should have solid proof for the relevance and wide applicability for all their skills. Their goals will be aligned to serve the single purpose of continually making themselves more and more employable.

 A truly employable candidate will talk about what he/she brings to the organisation, and in return, what he/she expects from the company by way of opportunities to grow himself/herself. For a genuinely employable candidate, an offer for employment from a company is not an end in itself. “Will this job make me more employable?” is the primary question that the organisation needs to answer to snap up a good candidate as an employee.  

 Your employability is definitely good only if the balance of power between you and your employer is undoubtedly tilted in your favour. 


Michael Crandal, CNG

AUTHOR: The ABC’s of Plutonium Private Club Leadership. FOUNDER: Christian Club Managers.

6 年
回复
Ryan Wong

Software developer learning about AI and ML, also reading a bit about philosophy and linguistics and other topics in order to understand how to improve systems that leverage LLM for businesses.

6 年

I would present a different perspective on one of the two types of candidates: // ‘also-ran’ employees with ‘vanilla’ skill sets will simply settle down // (quoted from the article). These new employees are what I call "pluripotent hires". Pluripotent is the technical term for stem cells that can differentiate into multiple types of tissues. A pluripotent hire is one that can morph into any skill set, to regenerate and rejuvenate the types of tissues that is most needed at the workplace. I deeply understand the values of specialist, multi-specialist, and generalist hires. However, a "vanilla skill set" person who is also pluripotent is also tremendously valuable. The latter has often been neglected.

companies should make sure their employees have a high level of employability as possible. Because that gives the company, a good competitive advantage

回复
Wayne P.

Comprehensive IT/ICS/OT Cybersecurity Evangelist

6 年

Nailed. Well versed, Mr. Srinivasan.

回复
.Duncan McClure

Program and Project Manager | Devices, Hardware, Software | I Help Teams Create Products Which Improve Health And Wellbeing

6 年

I think for many companies, "employability" is their way for demanding conformity. In my opinion, these companies need to take charge of training new employees instead of expecting every fresh graduate to fit in their mold.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ramesh Srinivasan的更多文章

  • “Should I Do a MBA?”

    “Should I Do a MBA?”

    The question I am most often asked by mid-level managers in the companies I work with is about whether doing an MBA at…

  • China Makes The Wrong Choice

    China Makes The Wrong Choice

    Soon after George Bush lost his presidency, Oprah Winfrey interviewed Condoleezza Rice, Bush’s Secretary of State, and…

    15 条评论
  • Three Questions If You Are Designing Or Evaluating e-Learning

    Three Questions If You Are Designing Or Evaluating e-Learning

    Our neighbour's aunt dropped in to say hello, and we got chatting on how her job at the High School where she teaches…

    1 条评论
  • Why Humans Cannot Work Alone

    Why Humans Cannot Work Alone

    The story is so delicious that I decided to believe it after checking a few basic facts. Apparently, Sir Isaac Newton…

    11 条评论
  • Why WFH Will Be Sabotaged

    Why WFH Will Be Sabotaged

    The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History says during the last dramatic climate change 300,000 years ago, homo sapiens…

    34 条评论
  • Let Go! Let's Go!! It's Now India's Time!!!

    Let Go! Let's Go!! It's Now India's Time!!!

    Whichever way you slice and dice, India’s future is blindingly bright, and its potential is immense. Now, thanks to…

    11 条评论
  • What Rishi and Irrfan Can Teach Us

    What Rishi and Irrfan Can Teach Us

    Losing two actors of great caliber in a space of 48 hours has stunned the showbiz and movie audiences all over India…

    6 条评论
  • COVID 19: Change Is A Snowball

    COVID 19: Change Is A Snowball

    When Prof B F Skinner of Harvard threw a frog into boiling water, it jumped right out of the vessel, driven by sheer…

    2 条评论
  • Using Triage In Sales

    Using Triage In Sales

    In Extreme Measures, a 1996 film, a harassed surgeon has to decide which of the emergency cases get to use the only…

    2 条评论
  • God, Superheroes and WFH

    God, Superheroes and WFH

    Watching Alita – Battle Angel got one thinking about the number of super heroes we have been creating. There have been…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了