Misplaced Confidence

Famed economist and financial engineer Dr. Andrew Lo of MIT once wrote a paper entitled “Warning: Physics Envy May be Hazardous to Your Wealth.” Lo warns that, while we have come up with many “important breakthroughs in economics, physics envy has also created a false sense of mathematical precision in some cases.”

Though it’s been more than a decade since that paper, the concept and idea have stuck with me as it relates to economics, markets, various investment strategies, managing for risk and return, and using new information in old models.

We need to remind ourselves that economics and markets cannot be predicted with precision or consistency. They are not like the laws for gravity, inertia, velocity, mass, or thermodynamics.

Many have seen the studies showing that, even with the best research and models:

§? Active equity managers underperform the S&P 500, over long periods.

§? Economists and strategists are more often wrong than right.

Yet, we still sometimes see many trying to connect the dots, show a correlation chart giving “proof” that they’re right, or worse, telling us that the economy will collapse or that we’ll all run out of food. And it’s not just limited to economics and markets. Politicians have been known to use statistics and data to suit their narrative, often in less than truthful ways. We sometimes fall for these narratives, whether they are economic, political, or market related. Sometimes, we fall for them en masse.

Our confidence too often is misplaced in things or in people that do not offer precise models. Sometimes the predictions aren’t even close.

I’m guilty as the next person, however, for both analyzing various pieces of imprecise data as well as putting out my own imprecise forecasts. If I know it’s not precise, why do I do it and why does everyone else?

Because that’s all we have to work with. It’s not that dealing with imprecision is bad. It’s when we put too much weight or too much confidence in our views or when we think we are more precise than we actually are that it can become problematic.

Our evolved brains no longer need to worry about the predator hunting us, but we wish to be as certain as we possibly can in our decisions and in our beliefs. And we are right often enough to give us the confidence that we might be right again. The confidence isn’t bad either, it’s just having too much of it and in large doses that can hurt us.

When things are going smoothly, we might become subtlety overconfident about the precision of our decisions. Over time, we can confuse luck with skill. When we are overconfident, we tend to narrow our confidence intervals, because we feel higher conviction, perhaps due to our past successes.

We may be tempted to put too much weight on “normal” statistics, even though markets are often not normal. Or worse, to throw diversification out the window or fire our financial advisor, because of a few lucky bets we made that were overwhelmingly successful.

But the markets and the economy have a way of reminding us and humbling us when we mistake luck for skill and when we have gotten too loose with our discipline, throwing caution to the wind. Whether it be neglecting diversification, risk management, or abandoning information that doesn’t confirm with our views, there’s always a price to be paid for being overconfident.

Fast forward to last Monday and the market meltdown for several technology and energy stocks on the news of DeepSeek. We had heard experts tell us one thing, that we needed to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on AI investments for a number of years. There was apparently no way around it.

And over the weekend before, we saw a totally different narrative come out of the blue, that DeepSeek was able to accomplish what huge companies were able to accomplish, but on a shoe-string budget with limited chips and in just two months. Marc Andreesen even called it “AI’s Sputnik moment.”

The news sent shockwaves through the equity market. Several stocks, including Nvidia, dropped by 15% or on 1/27/25. The next day, the markets appear to be digesting the news in stride, with Nvidia up roughly 9% as of market close on 1/28/25. Did the assumptions completely change? Not entirely. We will still need large amounts of capital spending in technology. Will there likely be things that improve how efficient we can be at it? For sure. Will another innovation disrupt the current innovations? Likely.

This was a good example of a widely held assumption being challenged.

Some may have thought it was game over for Nvidia. Throw in how we communicate over social media and those feelings may have translated into some investors pressing the “sell” button in their investment accounts at precisely the wrong time. Had investors been grossly overconfident in their positioning, it could have been even worse.

In an imprecise economic world that is not governed by the laws of physics and one where human behavior, sometimes even crowd behavior, dictates directionality and amplitude, things can move very fast, often irrationally and without much thought as to reason.

This is why financial advisors and financial coaches can be critically important to clients, especially when emotions such as fear and greed come into play. Those emotions can come into play quickly and they almost always come into play during periods of uncertainty or volatility.

While 1/27/25 was different than every other pullback we’ve seen in the markets, there is one similarity shared with other market events that is worth paying attention to – new information challenging one or more pre-existing assumptions or the appearance of such. This could be related to an earnings report, a currency collapse, or fears of a recession or higher inflation.

When this condition is present, it can be easy to switch off our brain and let the emotions take over and get caught up in it. But if we are prepared in advance with proper portfolio positioning and we are investing for the right reason and at the right risk tolerance level, we can tell ourselves that “this too shall pass.”

If we are conditioned to remember that economics and markets are not predictable like gravity, we can avoid the unnecessary angst and stress over markets and economies that will almost always occur. If we can better understand why these things occur, we might even take advantage of the volatility and add to our investments, following the admonition of Warren Buffett, “be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.”


Disclosures & Important Information

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advice offered through WCG Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor. WCG Wealth Advisors, LLC and The Wealth Consulting Group are separate entities from LPL Financial.

These views are those of the author, not of the broker-dealer or its affiliates. This material contains an assessment of the market and economic environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources.

Fast price swings in commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor’s holdings. Commodities include increased risks, such as political, economic, and currency instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Government bonds are guaranteed by the US government as to the timely payment of principal and interest and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and fixed principal value. Bond yields are subject to change. Certain call or special redemption features may exist which could impact yield.

There is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio. Diversification does not protect against market risk.

The S&P 500 is a stock market index tracking the stock performance of 500 of the largest companies listed on stock exchanges in the United States. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in.

The volatility of indexes could be materially different from that of a client’s portfolio. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges.? You cannot invest directly in an index. Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

689305

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jim Worden, CFA, CMT, CAIA的更多文章

  • Outlook 2025 - Any Way the Wind Blows DOES Really Matter

    Outlook 2025 - Any Way the Wind Blows DOES Really Matter

    It’s nearly winter and it’s near that time when virtually every investment firm releases or has released their outlook…

  • Lessons I've Learned

    Lessons I've Learned

    For more than 25 years, I’ve been fortunate enough to work in this business. There have been plenty of changes and…

    11 条评论
  • 7 Reasons for S&P 7,000

    7 Reasons for S&P 7,000

    Here are seven reasons why this bull market has room to run and why the S&P 500 may hit 7,000 in the not-too-distant…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了