Misinterpreting Success in Recruitment
Andreas Vetr
Executive Search & Aufbau von Beratern und S/T/C (Sprecher, Trainern, Coaches) sowie Agenturen
Hey there!
Let’s talk about something that’s been on my mind—and honestly, a topic that comes up quite a bit with my clients: "The idea of success in recruitment."
Many of my clients define success by how quickly they fill open positions. It’s like a race to see who can get the position filled the fastest. But here’s the thing: while filling positions quickly might seem like a win, it often leads to bigger problems down the road.
I’ve seen it happen time and again. Companies rush to hire someone just to eliminate a vacancy, and before long, they’re facing turnover issues and mismatched hires that disrupt the whole team. Trust me, filling those gaps can feel good in the moment, but it can quickly turn into a headache.
A Common Misconception is Quick Hires Equal Success
Some of my mainly new clients come to me thinking that as long as they’re getting candidates in the door quickly, everything is on the right track. They believe that a high turnover of candidates means their hiring process is efficient. But here’s the catch: that mindset can lead to a focus on speed rather than quality.
Imagine hiring someone who looks great on paper but doesn’t really vibe with the company culture. It’s a recipe for disaster! I’ve had discussions with my clients, who thought they were doing everything right, only to find themselves in a cycle of constant hiring and turnover. It can be costly and creates a pretty negative atmosphere for everyone involved.
The Reality of Successful Recruitment
So, what’s the real deal when it comes to recruitment success? It’s all about finding candidates who not only have the right skills but who also fit into the culture of the organization, have the right motivation for the position and the organisation and other criteria. I’ve seen firsthand how companies, that prioritize cultural fit and alignment along other criteria with their values end up with employees who stick around longer and contribute positively.
领英推荐
For example, one of my clients came to me, after they hired someone who had great qualifications but didn’t share their vision. That hire didn’t last long and ended up costing them time and money (generally wrong hirings cost statistically 15 salaries). On the flip side, when they took the time to assess candidates for cultural fit and motivation, they found individuals who thrived and made a real impact.
Redefining Success in Hiring
So, how do we redefine success in hiring? It’s all about taking a more holistic approach. Here are some strategies that I’ve found effective:
By shifting our perspective from just "filling positions" to building a successful and sustainable workforce, we can ensure that our hires are not only capable but also genuinely committed to the organization’s vision and goals. This approach enhances employee satisfaction and retention, creating a vibrant workplace culture.
Let’s start thinking differently about recruitment success. While it is important to have the positions filled at the right time with the right person, it’s not just about how quickly you can fill a position but about building a team that lasts and thrives together!
Andreas Vetr
Seeking new opportunities as a | Seasoned Leader | Board Member | Business Angel | StartUp Mentor | championing value-based leadership ??
1 个月Dear Andreas, Insightful post. Dankesch?n. Having also been a Business Consultant around the Globe within the Volvo Group for Change Management, Transformation and fast Turnaround, I was once asked by the top #CFO what do I believe is the key to success for the business: I answered: “Having the right person, with the right competence at the right place”. A leader’s job is to make it happen. Today, I always say to my Manager’s colleagues when hiring: “‘This is our strategic top #priority: We take all the time needed in order to find the next talent for the job that fits into the #culture of us”. Moreover, we also do a test day at the new potential workplace with the top three candidates to choose from. Then, we make the final decision involving all relevant co-workers. This approach truly functions well. Ergo: You are spot on with your conclusion: “While it is important to have the positions filled at the right time with the right person, it’s not just about how quickly you can fill a position but about #building a #team that lasts and thrives together!”
HR Leader?? |?? | Building People-Centric Cultures for Business Growth ?? | OKR Coach | Global Talent Tech | Cultural Design |
1 个月I agree with your strategies especially about shifting from "filling positions" to cultivating a committed team that aligns with the organization's vision is particularly powerful. I'd like to propose a few additional metrics and strategies that could further enhance our approach to hiring success: Sourcing Channel Effectiveness: Have you considered establishing thresholds for sourcing channels?for candidate qualifications, cultural fit, and long-term engagement potential? This could help optimize our recruitment efforts and ensure we tap into the most effective talent pools. Interview-to-Offer Ratio: this metric could provide valuable insights into the efficiency of our interview process and the quality of candidates making it to the final stages. Candidate Net Promoter Score Implementing NPS surveys for candidates could offer a wealth of information about their experience and likelihood to recommend our organization. This could be invaluable in continuously improving our hiring process and employer brand. As combined with your holistic strategies, these could create a powerful framework for successful hiring. They not only focus on immediate placement but also on long-term fit, engagement, and overall candidate experience.