The (misguided) pursuit of beauty
David Burgess
Fundraising Consultant helping arts, culture, heritage and higher education organisations fundraise with confidence linktr.ee/ApolloFundraising
A Poundland monstrosity.
That was how my partner first described the Christmas light display I’d secretly hung up on the front of our house.
And, though I didn’t want to admit it, she was right. The bright neon star, reindeer and icicles that were now illuminating half our street suddenly looked a lot more garish than they had in the shop.
No wonder there were still so many left on the shelf…
When I’d bought them I was just thinking about how much our kids would love seeing them, and had hoped that they might spread some festive cheer to our part of the street. But, as I stood there staring at the blinding mass of white and purple LEDs,?I was starting to worry that I’d made a huge mistake.
The next day I bumped into our neighbour. I was about to apologise for bringing down the neighbourhood when he called out:
“Love the lights! I’m not normally a fan of Christmas lights but they look good. In fact, our daughter keeps asking if we can have some, too”.
Half an hour later and I’m up a step ladder hanging up a matching set of icicle lights on next-door’s house.
And that evening, as my youngest shouted out with excitement at the sight of Rudolph and his bright red nose beaming down from our bedroom window, my worries (and heart) melted.
So, why am I telling you this, and what tenuous link am I going to make to fundraising?
Our Christmas lights aren’t going to win any prizes for style, taste or design.?However, they’ve achieved what they were supposed to – putting smiles on peoples’ faces.
When we’re creating fundraising materials (e.g brochures, posters, emails, websites, proposals etc)?we often make design choices based on what we think looks good, rather than on what works - i.e. what is going to help us achieve our objectives.
领英推荐
But there are times when the pursuit of “beauty” ends up doing more harm than good, holding us back from what the brochure/poster/email/website/proposal is trying to achieve.
For example:
Remember – “aesthetic beauty” is not a meaningful KPI in fundraising.
Your design choices need to be driven by what you’re trying to achieve.
What makes your target audience more likely to take notice?
What makes them more likely to engage with the key parts of your message?
And what makes them more likely to take action?
So, next time someone tries to get you to change something because their way will “look nicer”, consider whether the change could end up doing more harm than good. And, if you don’t know, look for a way to test it.
That way, you can make ‘effective’, rather ‘aesthetic’ your (bright neon) guiding star.
This article was originally written for my fortnightly newsletter, Apollo's Muse. If you found this useful/interesting/a not unpleasant way to fill a few minutes of your life, sign up now to get future articles delivered straight to your inbox - https://apollofundraising.com/subscribe/
Consultant | business planning | grant fundraising | business administration | expert advice for culture, heritage, and environmental charities and nonprofits
2 个月Hurrah for this! In museums RNIB guidelines are (or should!) be used for labels and interpretive text, all the things you mention are part of visual and intellectual accessibility. Design has to function on all fronts.
Helping trusts, foundations & fundraisers create impactful partnerships.
2 个月100%! I’m always banging on about block justified text - it’s so hard to read. I love that from Lisa too! Also, how kind are you hanging them up for your neighbour?
?? Thankology Author | Fundraising Copywriter | Donor Communications Specialist
2 个月David Burgess Love this David! And thank you so much for the mention AND for spreading the word about effective design (vs pretty shapes!). ??????????
Director of Fundraising
2 个月Amen! Amen! Amen!! The ‘design over function’ trap is so tantalising, but so dangerous!