Microservice Design Patterns for Scalable and Resilient Systems
Rajiv Ranjan
Senior Engineering Manager @ Lowe’s | Share insights of System Design & Architecture??
Before we dive into the design patterns, we need to understand the principles on which microservice architecture has been built:
Building successful microservices requires a strategic approach & design patterns to adopt, few patterns are discussed below:
1. Integration patterns
The most commonly used microservices design patterns for integration are API Gateway and Backend for Frontend.
a. API Gateway: An API gateway acts as a single entry point for client applications to communicate with multiple services. It handles requests from clients, performs authentication, authorization, and routing, and forwards the requests to the appropriate services.
b. Aggregator Pattern: This pattern allows to abstract the business logic from multiple services and aggregate them in a single microservice. So, only one aggregated microservice is exposed to the UI instead of multiple services.
2. Database Patterns
Microservice Database Patterns embrace a variety of strategies for managing data within a microservices architecture. These patterns aim to address challenges such as data consistency, scalability, and isolation while ensuring that each microservice remains independently deployable and maintainable.
a. Database per Service: Each microservice will have its own dedicated database. This approach ensures loose coupling and independence between services, allowing each service to choose the most suitable database technology and schema design for its specific needs.
b. Saga design pattern: Saga allows to manage distributed transactions across multiple microservices using a sequence of local transactions. Each of these is accompanied by an event that will trigger the next stage. If one transaction fails, a rollback transaction is triggered to compensate.
Sagas can be implemented in “two ways” based on the logic that coordinates the steps of the Saga.
c. CQRS: CQRS is a pattern that separates the read and write operations in a service. It involves having separate models for reading data (query) and modifying data (command). CQRS helps optimize read and write operations independently, enabling better performance and scalability.
d. Event Sourcing: The event sourcing pattern stores a series of state-changing events and can reconstruct the current state by replaying the occurrences of an entity.
3. Decomposition Patterns
Break down complex functionalities into well-defined, independent microservices, promoting maintainability and scalability.
a. Sidecar: Every application needs various functionalities like monitoring, logging, configuration, etc. These peripheral tasks can be implemented as separate services. Keeping these services tightly coupled with the apps can lead to a single point of failure. So, if one component fails, it affects the entire application.
b. Decompose By Business Capability: One?strategy is to decompose by business capability. For example, an e-commerce is likely to have capabilities that include managing product catalogs, inventory, orders, and delivery.
3. Observability Patterns
Observability patterns in microservices refer to design principles and techniques that enable efficient monitoring, troubleshooting, and analysis of the system’s behavior and performance.
a. Distributed Tracing: Distributed Tracing tracks requests as they traverse through multiple microservices. By correlating tracing information from different microservices involved in processing a request, we can identify performance issues, latency bottlenecks, and failures. Distributed tracing enables pinpointing the exact microservice or operation causing a problem, facilitating efficient troubleshooting and optimization.
b. Performance Metrics: Metrics Collection involves capturing and aggregating various performance metrics from microservices. Metrics such as response time, error rate, throughput, and resource utilization provide insights into the system’s health and performance.
5. Cross-Cutting Concern Patterns:
Address concerns like security, logging, and authentication consistently across your microservices.
a. Circuit Breaker: The Circuit Breaker pattern prevents cascading failures by interrupting requests to a service that is experiencing issues. It monitors the service’s health and, when a certain threshold is reached, opens the circuit, diverting requests to a fallback mechanism to protect the system’s overall stability.
b. Blue-Green Deployment: The blue-green deployment pattern involves maintaining two identical environments, known as the blue and green environments. At any given time, one environment is active (blue) and serving live traffic, while the other environment (green) is inactive and ready to receive updates. When a new version of a service is ready, it is deployed in a green environment. After testing and verification, traffic is switched from the blue to the green environment, making it the active environment. Blue-green deployment enables seamless updates with minimal downtime and provides a rollback option if issues arise.
Senior Engineering Manager @ Lowe’s | Share insights of System Design & Architecture??
11 个月Have been using circuit breaker, saga, and API gateway most often. Which microservice design pattern is your favorite?