Micromanaging the Right Way
Image created with Microsoft Designer

Micromanaging the Right Way

Micromanaging has gotten a bad rap that maybe it doesn’t deserve. Consider two of the most successful technology CEOs—Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. No one had a sense of the image, brand, or product integrity like Gates or Jobs. They had insight and an esthetic sense of what image their products should convey. Within Microsoft, product review meetings with Gates were legendary. These meetings included development staff and first-line managers who were grilled, as no one but Gates could, on the details of the product. He was noted for uncovering the slightest flaw in thinking about new products.

Steve Jobs had a similar reputation. In his biography of Jobs (Steve Jobs, 2011), Walter Isaacson depicted Jobs as?leader of extreme proportions. When it came to product development he inserted himself into excruciatingly detail design decisions. There was seemingly no in-between with Jobs--it was either wonderful or crap. In one iPhone design story, Jobs was unhappy about the “sloppiness” inside the cover. Whether anyone outside Apple would ever see it wasn’t the issue—he pushed for design integrity in every aspect of a product.

Similarly, Robert Iger (Ride of a Lifetime), Disney CEO since 2005, wants to understand the nuances of creating feature films, which cost hundreds of millions of dollars to produce. He gets involved in storylines, animation technology, talent, and dailies. But directors and producers decide how to create the movie.

In recent years there has been a hue and cry that “managers should not micromanage.” But who is going to tell these three eminently successful CEOs not to suggest, or even demand, changes to products??During Jobs’ hiatus from Apple, the company lost its way—its culture. Culture originates in the C-suite and products need to embody that culture. Apple’s culture of creativity, individuality, and nonconformity, expressed in its products, was lost for a time. Jobs understood that and upon rejoining Apple immediately went to work reinvigorating its product line.

One of the tenets of self-organizing teams has been the mantra "don't micromanage." Agile managers, from teams to the executive suite, are admonished to create a clear vision, establish appropriate boundaries, facilitate collaboration–and then, get out of the way! When it comes to product, this “don’t micromanage” tenet is entirely wrong! There is a huge difference between micromanaging product and micromanaging people and process.

Jobs learned from his father to focus on every aspect of the product. He obsessed about every detail, often driving his teams to try version, after version, after version (iterative design in the extreme). In many ways, Jobs played the roles of product owner and customer. Jobs' passion for beautifully designed products that reflected the company’s culture made Apple into a stellar business success.

So would Jobs have been categorized as a good agile leader? If not, are we offering people the right leadership advice? There is no doubt that Jobs built one of the most successful technology companies ever. Gates built another as does Iger. Everyone seems to be jumping on the “don’t micromanage” bandwagon. I suggest it’s time we jumped off. While adaptive, agile leaders should engage in visioning, …, their ultimate success may?depend on product leadership-- creating outstanding, innovative products that reflect the essence of their organization’s culture.

?2023 by Jim Highsmith

#agilesoftwaredevelopment #scrummaster #agilemindset #agileprojectmanagement #agile #businessagility

Florian S. Wei?enstein

Co-Founder of YAZIO - We‘re hiring!

1 年

I cannot agree more! Thank you for writing this article and nailing it! To me, the best CEOs are product obsessive and product-detail driven!

回复
Brent Engelbrecht

Senior Full Stack Engineer - Java/Angular - Interested in microservices, API and cloud-native development

1 年

Product managers have a duty to micromanage the *product*. The "bad rap" that micromanagement gets is when it's applied to people and/or how the people execute their work.

回复
Ron Lichty

Making Software Development "Hum": Consulting VP Eng | Advisor | Agile Consultant | Co-Author: Managing the Unmanageable

1 年

Successful software development has always demanded clear product thinking. (And product-leader led and mission-led companies have often (more often than not?) been more successful than finance-led ones.) (And there was plenty of iteration and discovery, at Apple at least, in getting product to rise to meet Jobs's clear product thinking. I suspect same for Gates, Iger and Disney himself.) Agile's?hue and cry that “managers should not micromanage” has, in my experience, always referred to micromanaging people. If there are agilists resisting clear product thinking, sounds like another instantiation of Zombie Agile*. * lacks a beating heart

回复
Karl Burrow

Karllestone Capital/Business Model & Design Thinking /Strategy/Fintech/Growth/SPC Business Agility Coach/Change&Transformation/Adjunct Prof.Keio Univ. Entrepreneurship & Startup/ New York Univ. Marketing & New Ventures

1 年

This make perfect sense.... separate people and processes from from the product as the product produces value and that value has to resonate with the customer.

回复
Howard Wiener, MSIA, CERM

Author | Educator | Principal Consultant | Enterprise Architect | Program/Project Manager | Business Architect

1 年

There are two manifestations of this: one consists of telling people what to do and the other consists of telling people what needs to be done. In much the same way as teaching a man to fish enables him to feed himself for a lifetime, telling people what needs to be done and then letting them figure out do it leads to fulfillment, if not necessarily the fastest route to realizing management's vision. Telling people what to do, OTOH, leads to all of the sorts of organization pathology that many companies are famous for and which many don't survive. I have read stories about Gates and Jobs and other leaders (Elon Musk) in which they stray from the higher form of management and descend to the lower. As far as I can tell, few of these incidents represents the participants most shining moments.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了