Meyer's Management Models #52

Meyer's Management Models #52

Status Snakes & Ladders

How can I increase or decrease people’s status?

Key Definitions

A person’s or organization’s status is their standing compared to others – it is how they are ranked in the eyes of the people around them. As this relative standing is based on perceptions and reputation, status is not static, but changes over time and can be influenced. ?

Status can be derived from four key sources: From being seen as successful at a particular endeavor (achievement status), from being seen as morally good (virtue status), from being seen as member of a desirable group (affiliation status) and from being seen as powerful (power status). These are described in more detail in model 46 (Ambition Radar Screen).

Conceptual Model

The Status Snakes & Ladders framework outlines the six key factors influencing whether people and organizations gain or lose status. The name of the framework is a reference to the old board game Snakes and Ladders, in which participants can slide down away from the finish line or can take a shortcut up towards the finish by climbing a ladder. The framework’s key message is that the same up and down dynamic is true when it comes to status. However, in the board game everything depends on a roll of the dice, while in the status game there are six levers that can consciously be pulled to accelerate someone up or down. All six levers can be used by the people or organizations themselves, but also by those around them.

Key Elements

The six levers for increasing or decreasing someone’s status are the following:

  1. Rules. Higher status is awarded to people who behave according to social expectations – consistent with the unwritten rules that are part of the culture. For example, a successful person shouldn’t gloat, a morally good person shouldn’t be condescending, an in-crowd person should wear the right clothing and a powerful person should help the powerless. Conforming to these implicit social norms is key to achieving higher social status.
  2. Performance. But behaving ‘correctly’ is not enough – a person also needs to deliver. Real successes need to be achieved, morally good deeds need to be done, tangible membership of the in-group needs to be exhibited and/or the public wielding of power needs to be on display. People will be looking for concrete proof that a person can perform according to their standing. Doubt about their future ability to deliver can be detrimental.
  3. Publicity. As it is often difficult to see whether a person is performing and conforming to the social rules, people will look to what others are saying – they will listen to the gossip and scan the media to get a sense of someone’s standing in the eyes of others. This presents the opportunity to promote yourself or others, highlighting performance and spinning it in the most beneficial way, or alternatively, making someone else look bad.
  4. Symbols. People not only take their cues from the media but are also sensitive to symbols that reinforce a certain image. A private plane signals success, a self-help book implies moral goodness, a title suggests membership of a select group, and your name on a skyscraper shouts that you are powerful. This presents the opportunity to give people symbols (or withhold them) such as a fancy title, a company car and/or a corner office.
  5. Association. Another type of status cue is how a person is treated by people of a higher rank. If it is made clear that a person is accepted as a peer by people of higher standing, this is a quick ladder up. Conversely, if people on a higher rung kick someone down, showing by their behavior that they don’t embrace that person as an equal, that person will inevitably slide down the snake to a lower status. Who you associate with is everything.
  6. Recognition. Besides acceptance by peers, it is crucial to be acknowledged and respected by all others, especially by people of higher status. Being invited to visit the president, being asked to comment by a national TV network, being given an award, and being promoted to a new role are all examples of receiving recognition. This presents the opportunity for anyone to give, or withhold, public acknowledgements.

Key Insights

  • Status is a social construct. A person’s status is their social standing compared to others in the eyes of those around them. In other words, it is the perception that others have about a person’s rank in society. There is no objective measure, only a widely held impression.
  • Status can go up or down. A person’s status is not static, but can increase or decrease, sometimes relatively quickly. The change can be due to circumstances but can also be purposely influenced by people themselves or by those around them. ?
  • Status depends on six levers. A person’s status is shaped by how others view his/her conformance to social norms (rules), attainment of results (performance), coverage in the media (publicity), showcasing of signals (symbols), acceptance by peers (association) and acknowledgement by higher ranked individuals (recognition). Each of these factors can positively or negatively influence status but will typically reinforce each other.
  • Status can be influence by yourself. In the status game, each individual can use these six levers to climb the ladder to a higher standing. Being conscious and taking ownership are crucial but note that too much self-promotion breaks a social rule.
  • Status can be influenced by others. Being helped by others to move up the ladder is a good tactic. Therefore, leaders need to consider how they can use all six levers to strengthen the standing of the people around them (while indirectly profiting themselves).

Even the writer of LinkedIn posts needs to be helped by the people around him to achieve higher status. So, if you enjoyed this article and are willing to help me out, giving me a LIKE on LinkedIn, or even preferably a Comment would be very valuable. And, of course, please share with the people around you.

Next month's edition will be about the STAKEHOLDER VOICE MAP model, that helps to understand where various stakeholders stand on specific topics. You can find all previously published models at?https://www.c4sl.eu/publications/, where you can also download the blog as a pdf, download the model as a PowerPoint and subscribe to the blog.

Dafir Kramer

Consultant | Facilitator | Docent | Spreker op het gebied van strategie en veranderving

1 年

As always I am impressed with your performance when it comes to management knowledge. As an affiliate I am more than happy and willing to add to the publicity, since these models should be widely recognized. Respect!

Great work Ron. A good model to help to provide insight in eh laddership ??.. dutch translation that is... ranking the stars variation. Can be a powerfull tool/ instrument which I will gladly share

Mark McHugh

Product Manager | Sales Manager | Global | EMEA | Medical Device | SaaS | Launch | Revenue Growth

1 年

Nice to be important… but more important to be nice

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ron Meyer的更多文章

  • Meyer's Management Models #69

    Meyer's Management Models #69

    Interaction Drivers What influences how I interact with another person? Key Definitions Managers and employees interact…

    11 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #68

    Meyer's Management Models #68

    Innovation Sins & Virtues How can I improve the innovation capability of my organization? Key Definitions Innovation is…

    2 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #67

    Meyer's Management Models #67

    Top Line Growth Pie In which directions can I grow my firm’s sales? Key Definitions Firms often seek to grow their top…

    25 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #66

    Meyer's Management Models #66

    Sustainability Maturity Ladder What are the different levels of sustainability that my organization can achieve? Key…

    15 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #65

    Meyer's Management Models #65

    Self-Centered Thinking Traps Which dangers do I face when reasoning from my own perspective? Key Definitions Reasoning…

    4 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #64

    Meyer's Management Models #64

    Corporate Synergy Typology What types of synergies can I realize within my organization? Key Definitions There is…

    9 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #63

    Meyer's Management Models #63

    Guiding STAR Matrix Which objectives do I need to set to determine a future direction? Key Definitions An objective is…

    6 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #62

    Meyer's Management Models #62

    Hunting & Farming Typology How should I organize my sales process? Key Definitions All commercial organizations need to…

    10 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models Book

    Meyer's Management Models Book

    As subscriber to my Meyer's Management Models newsletter, you receive a new model each month. On July 1st it was the…

    2 条评论
  • Meyer's Management Models #61

    Meyer's Management Models #61

    Wicked Problem Scorecard How can I assess how challenging the problem is that I am facing? Key Definitions Managers are…

    14 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了