Message to Kristen

Message to Kristen

Kristen Gendron , the questions in your recent LinkedIn post are straightforward (How do we fix civil society?). However, addressing them within the current context of civil society in the United States presents some complexities.

For example,

·????? The voice of the average US voter has been substantially diminished by recent Supreme Courts decisions, including Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, which allows wealthy individuals, private corporations and unions to make unlimited political donations, and Trump v United States, which entitles the President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. Corporate profits, not society’s welfare, now dominate government policy.

·????? Republicans and Christian evangelicals, traditionally strong supporters of judicial independence, fair trade, and cultural and faith-based norms, overwhelming elected a convicted sex offender, fair election denier, and convicted business fraudster to become that President. Ethics and “Christian values”, no longer apply in civil society.

·????? According to Forbes, the US is home to the most billionaires (813), twice as many as China in second place with 406. Despite its wealth and self-proclaimed exceptionalism, the US ranks 10th overall on the OECD’s 2022 Better Life Index, 33rd out of 38 on life expectancy, and last on maternal and infant mortality. Americans have been sold a lie while being pitted against each other on the basis of race, gender, religion and income.

·????? Democratic and Republican administrations over recent decades have failed to significantly change the US’s OECD rankings. Trump is right in one respect; the average citizen is not benefitting from America’s wealth by the actions of either party.

So, what can business and community leaders do to improve American civil society? Clearly, sacrificing 5% of their time and money isn’t going to cut it.

I have two suggestions. First, you and your cousin Mackenzie should join forces to encourage businesses to build a social license to operate. Second, join a local Georgist association and promote the tax reforms of Henry George.?

A social licence to operate (SLO) is an area of growing interest in organisations overseas. As opposed to a primarily profit driven motive, SLO refers to an organisation’s ability to gain acceptance and approval from its stakeholders, including local communities, employees, customers, governments and the wider public. SOL is informal and based on trust, legitimacy and social acceptance. Essentially, companies benefit from the schools, health care, roads, bridges, housing, workforce and other social and economic infrastructure provided by the society they operate in. They should pay it forward as good corporate citizens.

The concept of SLO arose in the natural resources and extractive industries in Canada and Australia. It is not coincidental that counties with high levels of SLO also score highest on the OECD Better Life Index, including Nordic countries, Canada and some EU countries. You know, the counties Trump intends to punish for being such good neighbours.

A second suggestion is to promote reform of the tax system so that America’s enormous wealth is more equitably distributed. After all, Elon Musk arrived in the US with a backpack and became the richest man on earth because of the social, economic and political environment he found here. Perversely, he is now in the process of destroying that environment rather than working to improve it. Go figure.

Henry George, an early American economist and social reformer, led a tax reform movement in the late 1800s and early 1900s. He had a huge influence here in Australian society and on its land tax system. Georgists believe that individuals should own what they create, but that a country’s land and natural resources are common assets and should be taxed so that all society benefits. It is based on the idea that land value is created by the wider community rather than by individual effort.

George’s book, Progress and Poverty (1879), argued that economic inequality and poverty arise from land monopolisation, and that a single tax on land value could replace all other forms of taxation and lead to a more prosperous and just society. ?Privatize the Methods, Publicize the Profits, an award winning essay by Jamal Thomas, puts a contemporary spin on Georgists thinking. Give it a read.

Progress in either of these areas won’t come easily or soon, particularly given the destructive forces and ideas of the current US administration. You may in fact end up rebuilding civil society from the ground up. These will be great tools to start with in that event.

Good luck!

Uncle Joe

Mahmoud Fahmy

B.Sc. Civil Engineering, FIEAust CPEng NPER RPEV, PMP, MRICS

1 个月

Interesting article Joe Langley and more interesting is that it’s coming on a day where an American president is openly and unashamed calling for removing a nation from its own land and the US shall go in and develop it with the money of neighboring wealthy countries in the Middle East! Unfortunately US is missing the plot and is loosing its GLO #Global_License_to_Operate as a world leading country.

回复
Marko Bogicevic

Better transport | Better cities | Better lives

1 个月

Great post, Joe. It's quite sad to see how unequal the US has become, particularly falling from the genuinely exceptional highs of the 70s. Free market liberalism has had a lot to do with that, but so has good old crony capitalism, as you touch on. In Australia, there's a lot to be said for reducing electoral competition, as is being planned for by the Labor Government at a federal level. Reducing the ability for smaller interest groups and representatives to get a seat in the room where it happens can have decades-long repercussions. We must fight and vote against this! Regardless, I'm proud and grateful to be an Australian. Thanks for reminding me so!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joe Langley的更多文章

  • Save the Date for High Speed Rail!

    Save the Date for High Speed Rail!

    Australia's premier 2025 High Speed Rail Conference is coming to Sydney in June! The Australian High Speed Rail…

  • Wilful Acts of Bastardry

    Wilful Acts of Bastardry

    Ken Henry’s blunt assessment of the state of Australia’s lopsided tax system should be a wakeup call to Gen X, Gen Z…

  • Biden vs Trump debate

    Biden vs Trump debate

    The US has much to learn from Australia. For example, if preferential voting were the norm in North America, Trump…

  • Sydney High Speed Rail Conference

    Sydney High Speed Rail Conference

    Prof Andrew McNaughton will provide his insights into where to start and where to go for Australia's first high-speed…

  • Could Rosehill Racecourse become Sydney's High Speed Rail Station?

    Could Rosehill Racecourse become Sydney's High Speed Rail Station?

    NSW Premier Minns’ decision to proceed with Sydney Metro West and to add a station at Camellia’s Rosehill Racecourse…

    27 条评论
  • Putting your money where your mouth is

    Putting your money where your mouth is

    With the threat of cancelling what is objectively the most important line in Sydney Metro’s planned network, Metro West…

    2 条评论
  • Sydney Metro West - Don't say you weren't told

    Sydney Metro West - Don't say you weren't told

    For anyone with a keen interest in big transport projects and an Excel spreadsheet, the prospect of delays or…

    11 条评论
  • Back to the future: Aussie HSR

    Back to the future: Aussie HSR

    It's great to see Infrastructure Minister Catherine King call for experts to fill board roles on the newly created…

    4 条评论
  • NSW dodges productivity improvements

    NSW dodges productivity improvements

    How ironic that the NSW government has dumped infrastructure contributions reforms proposed by the independent…

    10 条评论
  • City of Sydney bites the hand that feeds

    City of Sydney bites the hand that feeds

    For anyone who has read the Productivity Commission’s Review of Infrastructure Contributions in NSW or taken a stroll…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了