No Mercy / No Malice: Uber-Inequality

No Mercy / No Malice: Uber-Inequality

The middle class is an accident. From the end of WWII to the introduction of Google, we’ve found cold comfort in the delusion that wages, dictated by supply and demand, could sustain the greatest source of good in history, the American middle class. They don’t, and they won’t. Piketty is right — wealth begets more wealth, and the top tiers of income earners are pulling away. Note: I’ve read Piketty’s opus and don’t understand it, but referencing him makes me feel smart. Easier to explain with a chart:

Here in My Car

There are 274M cars in operation in the US. Assuming they have an average value of $20K, we have cars forming a $5.39T asset base. This capital infrastructure registers 5% utilization. Uber figured out software that lets any one of us with a smartphone tap into a previously fallow $5.12T asset. It’s as if your smartphone could bring the US Navy into your employ. I’d like to waterski behind the Nimitz Class Carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) in the C?te d’Azur in a speedo and tassels. What app is that?

Uber received proposals from investment banks that pegged the ride-hailing firm’s IPO valuation at $120B. So, that posits Uber’s value is greater than the value of the US airline industry or the US auto industry (excluding Tesla). I love Uber and think the firm is genius. But that valuation is insane. Uber’s model doesn’t have the moats of an auto firm or even Airbnb, which must create global demand and supply (a local competitor to Airbnb doesn’t work, as visitors from other countries wouldn’t know about it). In contrast, local on-demand taxi services abound, even if without an app. The 120K readers of this newsletter could each put in $250, and boom — we have the number-three ride-hailing firm in Miami. Who’s with me?

Uber has managed to create an ecosystem that unapologetically shows us a future under bright fluorescent lighting: it’s never been better to be remarkable, nor worse to be unremarkable. Which is all good until the disturbing truth rears its head: most of us, and our children, are not remarkable.

In today’s economy, innovation means elegant theft: robbery of your data, privacy, health insurance, or minimum-wage protection. Uber has 16Kemployees and 3M driver partners. “Driver partner” means some great things. It means you don’t have to show up to an office. And it means you can work whenever you want — this is key. When I speak to Uber drivers, I always ask, “Do you like working for Uber?” The overwhelming majority say yes and reference the flexibility. I’ve been especially struck by how many need the flexibility, as they’re taking care of someone who’s sick. So many people taking care of others. So many people loving other people. And it comes at a huge cost. Many of them used to have jobs with benefits. Many had to move to a strange place to take care of their sister, mother, nephew.

Equity

Uber and several other gig economy firms have asked the Securities & Exchange Commission to review current laws that prohibit them from giving stock to contractors. “Providing equity would allow [drivers] to share in the growth of the company, which could lead to enhanced earning and savings opportunities,” Uber wrote to the SEC this month.

Equity, or options on equity, would be a smart thing for these firms, as it would help cement their leadership position with a powerful retention tool financed with cheap equity. It also has the benefit of being the right thing to do. Airbus, Delta, GM, UPS — all worth less than Uber — each built and support on average 200K middle- to upper-middle-class households. Uber helps 3M households and is about to make 16K households wealthy. Note: CEO Dara Khosrowshahi stands to make $120M on the IPO. There is substantial variance, as each firm has a different ratio of stock owned by employees. However, this would likely only make the delta more stark, as Uber’s extraordinary rise means current and former employees have managed to maintain a lot of the company, which is a good thing.

This feels like the right moment in history to fire up a concept from a time gone by … unions, which have been in decline since the 80s. Corporations have the full-throated support of the Trump administration, and as federal prosecutors battle on behalf of these firms, Uber drivers enjoy few of the benefits of folks like me (member, ACT-UAW Local 7902).

Unconscious Uncoupling

I believe the recent volatility in stocks is the beginning of the end of the Four(Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google) moving in sympathy with one another. Consumer trends, the macro environment, and the threat of regulation are shining more intensely on some of them for different reasons. The previous sentence was a fancy way of saying one of these things is not like the other. I was on Fox Business yesterday. One of the staff joked, “This is the safest building in the world,” referencing the increased security and progressive targets of the pipe bombs sent this week. But the mood was somber. I couldn’t discern if it was concern for their colleagues, sheer fear, or both.

On the show I said Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg will be remembered as one of the most dangerous and damaging management duos in the history of business. Genius and likability coupled with an idolatry of innovators have depressed our teens, molested our elections, prematurely euthanized big firms, and performed infanticide on small ones. Big tech is net/net a positive for society. In this regard, Facebook has unconsciously uncoupled from the others. The chyron on my segment was “NYU Professor: Zuckerberg/Sandberg are lipstick on cancer.”

Uber has the opportunity and momentum to consciously uncouple from some of the disturbing aspects of the gig economy and big tech. The management team distributing meaningful equity could set an example that illuminates the goodness of capitalism, while increasing loyalty and retention. Many will be tempted to find rationalizations that propagate a hoax, that shareholders come before employees or the commonwealth. Put another way, “Dara, are you just another shade of lipstick?”

Life is so rich,

Scott

P.S. More on Uber’s valuation and other tech news on this week’s Pivot, my podcast with Kara Swisher. Subscribe and I will surround you with white light.

Subscribe to No Mercy/No Malice to get weekly musings in your inbox.



Originally published at www.l2inc.com.

Tim Furey

Technology and B2B Services Investments

6 年

Great blog...even though I don’t quite agree on all points. First, the inequality chart (assuming the data is right despite coming from an agenda driven source) just shows that the ownership of technology is what drives inequality. Nobody is intentionally screwing the middle class, but let’s face it: code and data are more scalable and wealth creating than hourly human labor. Second, the Uber analogy is spot on. ?Why would government prevent Uber execs and drivers from entering into an equity sharing arrangement? Whether the drivers need a union or not, we will see. ?But here is the problem I see: the opportunity to share in Uber’s upside can not be polluted by government guaranteeing outcomes. ?If drivers (e.g. the middle class) are given the opportunity to share the wealth, government can’t then create all these regulations and hoops to “protect” the drivers from any and all downside risk. The middle class needs more opportunities to create a better life (checkmark Uber) but we can’t guarantee financial outcome equality. ?Let’s let free markets make the pie bigger for everyone even if the wealthiest get a disproportionate share.

回复
Albert Knuth

Sales Director DACH & CEE @ Backyard Products - Retail | Distribution | e-Commerce | Key Account Management

6 年
回复

I just can't see what competitive advantage Uber has over other companies, they are having the cost of bribing politics, but after that the game is open for all. Also there is a thing? called? goodwill, which Uber has destroyed once it was evident to all that they didn't give a damn both to its clients and its employees.It will happen to Tesla soon, you can't cater to city, upper income, environmental, people and at the same time hate liberals...

回复
Jerzy Opar

12 Years of Sales Experience | Startup, Technology, Marketing | Webflow Websites @ mind&matter

6 年

Thanks for that!?

回复
Chris Lynn

Digital printing & packaging consultant and advocate for practical sustainability initiatives. Chartered Engineer, M.I.E.T.

6 年

Scott Galloway?I enjoy your posts, but there is something incoherent about this one. You imply that Uber's $120bn putative valuation is ludicrous (I agree) yet you suggest giving equity to its 3m drivers. This ignores the facts that (a) the valuation is probably unsustainable, so the equity may be worthless, (b) the valuation relies upon paying the drivers peanuts or making them redundant with self-driving cars, and (c) the current scale of Uber's losses is only sustainable because it is able to raise new capital. An IPO might make 16,000 new millionaires, but I predict pain for its drivers, with or without shares. PS I agree 100% with your assessment of Facebook.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Scott Galloway的更多文章

  • Unlocks

    Unlocks

    A cornerstone of sustained prosperity is the unlock: unleashing a leap forward with a new approach. Thinking different,…

    14 条评论
  • Capitalists or Cronyists?

    Capitalists or Cronyists?

    6-min read Lenin said nothing can happen for decades, and then decades can happen in weeks. Yes, a pandemic pulls the…

    24 条评论
  • Post Corona: Higher Ed

    Post Corona: Higher Ed

    6-min read After COVID-19, nothing will be the same. The previous sentence is bullsh*t.

    11 条评论
  • Jack Dorsey Gets a Stay of Execution

    Jack Dorsey Gets a Stay of Execution

    It feels like a lifetime ago, but on Monday, private equity firm Silver Lake announced a $1 billion investment in…

    3 条评论
  • LAnd of the Undead

    LAnd of the Undead

    5-min read Jack Warner, co-founder of Warner Brothers, built an empire that birthed films including Casablanca, Batman,…

    3 条评论
  • 2020 Predictions ??

    2020 Predictions ??

    7-min read So, why make predictions? Eisenhower said, “Plans are worthless, but planning is indispensable.” The same is…

    16 条评论
  • FckdEx ??

    FckdEx ??

    7-min read In the next 24 months, FedEx will either be acquired or lose an additional 40%+ in value. The likely…

    19 条评论
  • Third Base

    Third Base

    Ignorance looks in the mirror and sees intelligence. 5-min read The Dunning-Kruger effect posits that dumb people are…

    18 条评论
  • TWTR: Enough Already

    TWTR: Enough Already

    Jack Dorsey needs to step down. 5-min read To: Omid R.

    7 条评论
  • Stream On ??

    Stream On ??

    In the #streamingwars, Amazon's Emmys are the most expensive. 5-min read My NYU colleague professor Adam Alter has…

    16 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了