Medicine needs visionaries

Medicine needs visionaries

“Biology is too complex”

“These new technologies are just hype”

“Our healthcare system is too complicated”

“We already do data science, and it hasn’t delivered”

“Computers can’t understand the messiness of disease”?

“The economic incentives in healthcare don’t promote innovation”

“Biology will never be quantified like the laws of physics, it’s impossible”

“We can’t move fast and break things in medicine because lives are at stake”

If you work at the intersection of tech and biology, there’s no doubt you’ve heard all of these statements before. All of the reasons why the status quo will, and should, remain in place. The reasons costs will continue to rise, while life expectancies stagnate. The reasons you’ll fail to affect any change at all.??


Our healthcare system is broken.?

At over $12,000 per person, the United States has the highest per capita healthcare costs in the world; nearly double that of any other country. But we’re not getting what we pay for. We rank 51st in terms of average life expectancy at birth, which comes in around 77 years; 7 years less than the average lifespan in Japan. During the last few years, life expectancy in the US has actually been going down.?

No alt text provided for this image
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

But, at least we’re developing new innovative treatments, right? Well, drug discovery is taking longer and costing more than ever before. According to Scannell et al, the cost of developing a new drug is doubling every 9 years. This is known as Eroom’s law because it looks like the opposite of Moore’s law in computing (the number of transistors on a microchip roughly doubles every two years, whereas its cost is halved in that same timeframe).?

No alt text provided for this image
https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd3681

Our healthcare system is broken, and everybody knows it.?


The status quo is broken, but lots of people in medicine don’t want anything to change. Well, that’s not exactly true—I believe they want the outcomes to change, but they don’t want to change any of the things we do to drive outcomes. They want to keep doing the same things over and over again, but expect different results. Insanity.?

What’s the risk of moving fast and breaking things if the system is already broken? The real downside scenario is that we do little or nothing to change things. Costs keep rising, and people keep dying. Given where we are, incremental changes aren’t going to get the job done. It’s going to take bold, radical changes to improve our healthcare system. It may seem risky, and some of the things we try may indeed fail, but at least they have a chance at success.??


Medicine needs fewer naysayers and more visionaries.?

In our case, we believe that AI will become the new language of biology and it will usher in dramatic changes to how we think about and practice medicine. By advancing AI we will uncover solutions to problems once thought to be impossible, transforming our understanding of the world and ourselves. This transformation of AI will revolutionize healthcare, turning medicine from an art form into a predictive science. By using AI to accelerate clinical innovation, we can bring life-saving treatments to those who need them most and improve the lives of millions of people.?

Perhaps you’re already thinking it…

“Biology is too complex”

“These new technologies are just hype”

“Our healthcare system is too complicated”

“We already do data science, and it hasn’t delivered”

“Computers can’t understand the messiness of disease”?

“The economic incentives in healthcare don’t promote innovation”

“Biology will never be quantified like the laws of physics, it’s impossible”

“We can’t move fast and break things in medicine because lives are at stake”

Maybe you’re right. But we’d rather take the risk required to make the world a better place than to settle for a broken status quo. Come join us, partner with us, or collaborate with us, but don't stand in our way.

Andy Wilson

Head of Innovative RWD Analytics

1 年

Amen! Many of the naysayers have a false dichotomy in mind -- where they are either 'keeping the bad stuff out' of the castle or lowering the drawbridge to 'let the good stuff in.' People who are really good at this are excited AND skeptical. They're going out into the surrounding villages, constantly welcoming new villagers. We keep an eye on them, make sure they fit in, and help them become part of the community. That way, our kingdom stays lively and keeps growing. :) There is equal peril to just keeping the drawbridge closed and letting your kingdom become irrelevant.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Fisher的更多文章

  • The Real Danger of AI Is Safety

    The Real Danger of AI Is Safety

    Social Manipulation Masquerading as Information Introduction: The Tsk Tsk of AI For the past five months, I’ve immersed…

    8 条评论
  • AGI will be underwhelming

    AGI will be underwhelming

    Summary The achievement of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) within the next five years is now a popular talking…

    2 条评论
  • Reflections on 39 years.

    Reflections on 39 years.

    Today is my 39th birthday. During this, my 39th year of life, I lost an uncle, then my grandfather, then my father.

    20 条评论
  • For better writing, turn it up to 11

    For better writing, turn it up to 11

    Most writing is boring as hell. Presentations too.

    3 条评论
  • A War on Wimpiness

    A War on Wimpiness

    Wimp: A weak, cowardly, or unadventurous person. (Oxford English Dictionary) A society that breeds wimps breeds…

    9 条评论
  • The Art of Artificial Intelligence Research

    The Art of Artificial Intelligence Research

    The Artistic Expression of Science Science is often perceived as a purely rational and logical endeavor. We say that a…

    1 条评论
  • The Bitter Lesson of Domain Knowledge

    The Bitter Lesson of Domain Knowledge

    Since the beginning of the field, machine learning researchers have been tempted by the alluring idea of creating…

    7 条评论
  • Damn the torpedoes!

    Damn the torpedoes!

    My memo to Unlearn's board at the beginning of 2023 was called “A Declaration of War”. It focused on our need to build…

    2 条评论
  • Why Moore’s law will eat Eroom’s law

    Why Moore’s law will eat Eroom’s law

    Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit doubles roughly every two years…

    4 条评论
  • Digital twins in clinical trials: How they work, and how they don’t.

    Digital twins in clinical trials: How they work, and how they don’t.

    At Unlearn, we invented the concept of using patients’ digital twins to improve clinical trials. Not only have we…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了