Media Agencies' $25B Bounty For Change

Media Agencies' $25B Bounty For Change

For the full piece please click here to see this on Mediapost.

$25 billion worth of media reviews has been announced  in the last few months. So is this a statistical anomaly, or a sign that after 20 years of endless talk about change, clients are finally making demands that agencies do so?

I think it’s a welcome sign that clients are demanding more. Internet anthropologist Clay Shirky famously observed that “Most institutions will preserve problems to which they are the solution.” I think for years, while media agencies have talked endlessly of change, they have done as little changing as possible. The status quo & dragging of feet served them too well.

Buying media is way too profitable to give up, while solving client problems is way harder.
I believe we’ve never faced a greater disconnect between the scale and complexity of the problems that our clients face and advertising agencies’ ambition, thirst and willingness to change.

Cannes will soon celebrate our industry’s love of one-off vending machines, drone deliveries, hashtags, 3D printed junkets, and experiential gimmicks. We will showcase agencies having fun with the toys, while our clients worry about so much — from totally transformed consumer behavior to a bewildering array of new channels to, perhaps, their whole business being disintermediated or eaten by a startup.

Here are some of the themes and issues I hear most commonly:

A move to digital and mobile. Pretty much every client is aware that while we may watch more TV than ever and consume more news, we’re doing it on more-connected, more-mobile devices. This gives rise to massive challenges. Common questions include, should I move my money totally online? How do I make the most of mobile? How can I build my brand online? All questions many media agencies and strategists just don’t have good answers to. The rise of programmatic also raises interesting questions about structure: How do we place buying teams at the heart of, not separate from, media planning teams?

The pace of change. The trends we used to see on the far horizon — a shift to mobile viewing, the decline of TV, emerging platforms — are happening faster than we ever predicted. It’s a time when SnapChat can double user numbers in the same time that apps like Ello can go from Facebook killer to distant memory.  Clients want to know what’s next, what is dead, what is changing, what isn’t, and how can they try and learn?  Agencies need to keep their finger on the pulse and be extra-agile and ready to change.

Measurement. We’re all aware of Big Data, but we’re not quite sure how it’s different from what we used to simply call “data.” Clients more than ever need to find actionable insights from data — and to do this, they need  better data analysis, but above all else, they need to know what to measure and what metrics actually matter. Clients need help beyond what most agencies are designed to provide.

Fragmentation and attention. Attention spans are dwindling, second- and third-screening is rife, media consumption becomes glances while multitasking. Is the solution more interruption or more engagement? Can hashtags ever take off? Is native the solution? What can content marketing really do for me?  Faced with fragmentation and dwindling attention, we know that content can be a solution. We need media agencies that are more adept at content and aligned to video distribution, not just TV buying.

What’s next? Clients need media agencies to move their focal point further into the future, to go from being agile to anticipatory, to blend media, creative and technology together — to move from the act of buying media to solving business problems. They need people who can understand wearables, put mobile coupons in place, understand a whole new world of platforms — and how addressable TV will change things.

Change. The change to digital media has caused structure issues in the entire world of advertising. We’re arranged around channels in a world where the Internet makes them irrelevant. We’re spending more and more time in places demonstrably harder to connect.

Now I’d like to think that the agency where I work has made the changes, and is agile, future-thinking, and entrepreneurial, working as a village to bring media and creative together, placing digital and programmatic at the head and bringing mobile, technology and ideas together.

So the question becomes, what has your agency done to solve the problems of today and tomorrow?

Michael Kogon

CMO/CTO @ Pull-A-Part | Marketing, IT, Customer Experience

9 年

Tom thanks for the dig at “one-off vending machines” as the owner of the Agency that created the “Happiness Machine for Coca-Cola” it is good see that the work still merits a place in the mind ? As a retired agency CEO I could not agree with you more that the evolution that began in the late 90's is starting to take shape. As an operating business owner now (client side) I look forward to my agency partners, technology consultants and content creators to stay sharp and focused and bring me fresh thinking.

Steve Harrington

eLearning & Technical Consultant (Igeddit - I get it) - not the douchebag Steve Harrington -

9 年

Excellent article, Tom. I especially like the following lines.. "What’s next? Clients need media agencies to move their focal point further into the future, to go from being agile to anticipatory, to blend media, creative and technology together — to move from the act of buying media to solving business problems."

Shann Biglione

SVP | Reputation and Risk Intelligence, AI, Corporate Strategy

9 年

I don't entirely agree. Yes agencies need to work differently as the way we plan and buy media is changing (I'm pretty sure that a lot of these reviews are motivated by changing the terms and conditions of the deals in place since the lines become blurrier and some areas of digital buys darker - that and the chance to get cheaper costs, as usual). But at the same time I think everyone is wayyy too obsessed with change when the very nature of our consumers (and how advertising works) does not nearly evolve that fast. Our industry is throwing the baby with the bathwater at every occasion. Sure, we all need to adapt (and the "all" part is important, aspects of procurement make these changes very hard), but rather than scaring the shit out of clients about the illusional changes that revolutionize everything every 12 months, we ought to remind ourselves of the importance of the (derided) basics. It is increasingly difficult to walk into a marketing room and find people who even understand how branding works.

回复
Ford Knowlton

Connecting the Cincinnati region's business owners with relationships and resources that align with their ambitions and values.

9 年

Good stuff. A lot of Epipheo's clients are writing out digital video content from their contracts with their AOR because they can't deliver at the quality, speed and price of specialist studios.

回复

Excellent piece,Tom. It's just amazing how many agency reviews have been taking place. I don't know exactly what that all means, but the status quo seems like it will no longer suffice.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tom Goodwin的更多文章

  • Envisioning the Unimaginable: AI PCs and the Power of Possibility

    Envisioning the Unimaginable: AI PCs and the Power of Possibility

    As the expression goes, “First we shape our tools, then they shape us”, and now we’re in the most exciting period of…

    11 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 28

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 28

    Scott Galloway talks about Brexit, Are AI Influencers really the future of marketing, Nobody Cares, and is AI really…

    15 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 27

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 27

    The Ghost of Twitter's Past haunts me, What is Zuckerberg doing, and will "Made In China" cars be no more in the US?…

    5 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 25

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 25

    Why my wallet is so bulky, Japan's Juxtaposition, unplugging from work, and no your phone is not spying on you. As…

    4 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 24

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 24

    Tech tensions as the AI hype cycle continues. Plus: hyperabundance, why change management is broken, the Woozle effect,…

    9 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 23

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 23

    Some more on Gen ai (of course!), crazy shoe designs, self check outs, medication and some other jazz..

    6 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 22

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 22

    This was posted one week ago to my Substack. Here - https://tomgoodwin.

    4 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 21

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 21

    This was posted one week ago to my Substack. It's here I'm trying to get people to move over and subscribe there, but…

    10 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 20

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 20

    I go quite deep into AI this week, more questions than answers. As always, get this faster and with more stuff directly…

    15 条评论
  • Edition 18

    Edition 18

    Artificial realties, drugs direct, why tech teams keep failing and more..

    11 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了