Measuring ROI for Generative AI: Why Aren’t We Talking About It?
Image generated by matplotlib

Measuring ROI for Generative AI: Why Aren’t We Talking About It?


The Gap in the Conversation

Walk into any AI discussion, and you’ll hear buzz about capabilities—how fast it writes, how creative it gets. But ROI? It’s the elephant in the room. Maybe it’s because the gains feel elusive—some are hard numbers, others are vibes. Or perhaps we’re so caught up in the shiny newness of tools like ChatGPT or DALL·E that we haven’t paused to ask: “What’s the payoff?”

I don’t have all the answers yet, but I’m starting to piece it together. Generative AI isn’t just a cost-cutting tool; it’s a value-adding partner. So, measuring its ROI might need a dual lens—quantitative and qualitative.


The Quantitative Side: Numbers We Can Count

Let’s start with what we can measure-hard, cold numbers that hit the bottom line. Think of these as the ROI metrics you can proudly share in a boardroom:

  • Cost Savings: A designer drops from 10 hours to 2 on a project—8 hours of payroll back in your pocket.
  • Efficiency Gains: Output skyrockets. Imagine 100 AI-generated reports churned out in the time it once took for 20.
  • Revenue Lift: A personalized campaign bumps sales 15%—dollars you can count.

For example, consider a data engineer wrestling with a gnarly SQL query involving joins and subqueries—a 30-second slog. Pre-AI, it took 5 hours to optimize. With generative AI, an optimized version is ready in 1 hour, and runtime drops to 3 seconds. That’s a 400% efficiency leap and 900% faster queries. Handling 10 queries a week? That saves 40 hours monthly—real money, real impact. The formula is simple:

ROI = (Net Benefit / Cost) x 100        

While costs cover development and upkeep, gains come from both savings and growth. Yet, numbers only tell part of the story.


The Qualitative Side: Value Beyond the Spreadsheet

Now, consider the fuzzy wins—the benefits you feel more than tally. This is where generative AI flexes as a true partner, not just a tool:

  • Team Relief: That data engineer isn’t burned out anymore. Deadlines shrink from a week to a day, and late-night debugging becomes a thing of the past. They’re out by 5 p.m., free to dream up new ideas.
  • Client Delight: Faster dashboards hit inboxes, eliciting exclamations like “This is next-level!”—a satisfaction boost that you can almost feel.
  • Creative Edge: With breathing room comes innovation. That same engineer might pitch a groundbreaking new pipeline—an intangible win that feels like gold.


A Starting Point: Baseline and Blend

Before you can measure the ROI of generative AI, begin by establishing a baseline: document how things look pre-AI versus post-AI in terms of time spent, costs incurred, and outputs delivered. Then, blend the hard data (say, a 20% cost drop) with the soft wins (for example, “My team’s less burned out”). Over time, you can refine your metrics—early on, you might focus more on adoption, while later, revenue impact could take center stage.


Why This Matters

If we don’t figure out how to measure ROI, generative AI risks being seen as a flashy experiment rather than a strategic asset. It’s not just about proving the tech works—it’s about showing how it transforms the way we work. The conversation about ROI isn’t complete without both the tangible and intangible benefits. After all, if we’re not debating ROI now, we might be missing the point entirely.


Let’s Get Practical: A Framework—With a Twist

While I haven’t started measuring ROI just yet, here’s a simple, adaptable framework that ties goals to results—even when constraints are thrown into the mix. Imagine leadership slashing the budget by 40% and demanding results in half the time. Some say it’s a pressure cooker that could tank the team; I believe it’s a creativity booster, especially with generative AI tools at our disposal. Constraints can force sharper focus. Here’s the play-by-play:

Real-World Example

Consider that data engineer again: the goal is faster queries. Pre-AI, a 40% cut and halved timeline would have overwhelmed them—spending 5 hours per query and missing deadlines. With AI, they finish in 1 hour, saving 40 hours monthly and freeing up time to innovate with new pipeline ideas. In this scenario, constraints plus AI tools equal pure magic.

Am I nuts to think pressure breeds brilliance? Or does it risk killing morale and prove that AI is just a crutch? How would you handle this? I’m all ears—because if we’re not debating ROI now, we’re missing the point.

Udhayakumar Durai very well explained the challenge everyone is facing to handle 100s of AI requests being sent without ROI understanding.. Most of my business requests are , It will make my and my teams life easy.. which really doesn’t quantify as any value for leadership , making it impossible to make decision on investing into those use cases. Result.. Business is unhappy ?? AI is definitely reliable for teams to make their work easy but it is hight time we talk beyond productivity gains with AI.. people are looking for more hard dollar savings to justify the investment..

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Udhayakumar Durai的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了