Maximizing Forecast Accuracy through Forecast Value Added

Maximizing Forecast Accuracy through Forecast Value Added

Maximizing Forecast Accuracy through Forecast Value Added Analysis:

Techniques and Advancements

Introduction

In today's fast-paced business environment, companies must be able to manage their supply chains and operations efficiently to remain competitive. One of the key components of this is accurate forecasting, but this can be a challenging task. Forecast Value Added (FVA) analysis is a valuable tool for improving forecasting accuracy and identifying areas for improvement.

FVA is a comprehensive method of evaluating the performance of different steps and participants in the forecasting process. Its goal is to determine which steps add value to the forecast and which do not so that the process can be streamlined and improved. By using FVA, companies can identify areas where they can improve their forecasting process and increase the accuracy of their forecasts.

The Importance of FVA

Demand planning or forecasting future customer demand for a company's products or services is essential for efficient supply chain management. However, it can be challenging, and inaccurate forecasts can result in costly stockouts or excess inventory. FVA can help companies identify areas where their forecasting process can be improved, leading to more accurate forecasts and better demand planning.

FVA can also help companies identify which steps in the forecasting process are adding value and which are not. For example, a company may use several different forecasting methods, such as statistical, judgmental, and causal forecasting. FVA can help the company determine which method is most accurate and should be used more frequently.

Tailoring FVA to Specific Industries and Companies

FVA can be tailored to specific industries and companies. For example, a manufacturing company may have different forecasting needs than a retail one. The manufacturing company may have a different process of consensus forecast than the retail one and have more/different stakeholders in that process. To tailor FVA to a specific industry or company, it's important to understand the unique characteristics of the industry or company and to tailor the analysis accordingly. This could include using industry-specific performance metrics or incorporating industry-specific data into the analysis. It's also important to involve key stakeholders in the forecasting process, such as sales and marketing teams, to ensure that the forecast is aligned with the company's goals and objectives.

Implementation Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

Implementing FVA requires careful consideration of factors such as data availability, stakeholder buy-in, and resistance to change. Robust data collection and management processes are necessary to address data availability and quality challenges. This involves ensuring data integrity, timeliness, and completeness through data governance frameworks and leveraging automation and digitization. Gaining stakeholder buy-in is crucial, and transparent communication about the benefits of FVA is essential. Proactive communication, education efforts, training, and support can enhance stakeholders' understanding and acceptance of FVA. Resistance to change is a common challenge, and involving key stakeholders early on, along with change management activities, helps alleviate concerns and ensure a smooth transition.

Implementing FVA

Implementing FVA can be done in several ways. One way is to compare the forecast to actual sales and calculate the error. This method is known as Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Another way is to compare the forecast to a baseline forecast, such as a statistical forecast, and calculate the change in the performance metric. By combining the MAPE method with baseline forecast comparison, a comprehensive assessment of forecast accuracy can be achieved, enabling the identification of systematic biases or deficiencies

Once the FVA analysis is complete, companies can use the results to improve their forecasting process. For example, if the analysis shows that a particular step in the process is not adding value, the company can eliminate that step. If the analysis shows that a particular participant is not adding value, the company can replace that participant with someone who has more forecasting experience.

For example, in the table below, the Approved Forecast has a MAPE of 7% against the Statistical Forecast, which had 4%, the increase in error derived from the poor performance of both the Planner Overrides and Consensus Forecasts.

In cases where this FVA report is generated every month or quarter, a business can understand what the root cause is for the decrease in accuracy.

No alt text provided for this image

Conclusion

FVA is a powerful tool that can help companies improve their demand planning process and forecast accuracy. It involves evaluating the performance of different steps and participants in the forecasting process to determine which steps add value to the forecast and which do not. By identifying areas where the forecasting process can be improved, companies can increase the accuracy of their forecasts and better manage their operations and supply chain. With different ways of implementing FVA and different performance metrics, companies have a broader range of options to evaluate the performance of their forecasting process. Additionally, it's important to note that FVA is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and different industries and companies may have different requirements and considerations for their forecasting process. Therefore, the implementation of FVA should be tailored to the organization’s specific needs.

The Analytical Factor team specializes in providing FVA solution that is tailored to meet the specific needs of your industry and company. With our expert's help, you can easily implement FVA and see results in more accurate forecasts and better demand planning. If you want to learn more about how FVA can help your company, please contact Analytical Factor ([email protected]) today. We would be happy to discuss your specific needs and help you implement FVA in a way that meets your goals.

?

Jim Black

Director Emeritus at ti&oe Consulting

1 年

More productive than trying to improve forecast accuracy of demand is to eliminate the need for forecasting by having a responsive supply chain. We only forecast demand because we can't provide supply as quickly as the client would like. Long lead times force us to anticipate. Anticipation is a fool's game. Don't anticipate. React. Any progress on lead time reduction will pay far greater dividends than any effort at "improving" forecast accuracy.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Analytical Factor的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了