Maximizing Forecast Accuracy through Forecast Value Added
Analytical Factor
? Excellence in Forecast Accuracy ? Demand Sensing ? Autonomous Forecast ? Trade Promotion Management
Maximizing Forecast Accuracy through Forecast Value Added Analysis:
Techniques and Advancements
Introduction
In today's fast-paced business environment, companies must be able to manage their supply chains and operations efficiently to remain competitive. One of the key components of this is accurate forecasting
FVA is a comprehensive method of evaluating the performance of different steps and participants in the forecasting process. Its goal is to determine which steps add value to the forecast and which do not so that the process can be streamlined and improved. By using FVA, companies can identify areas where they can improve their forecasting process and increase the accuracy of their forecasts.
The Importance of FVA
Demand planning
FVA can also help companies identify which steps in the forecasting process are adding value and which are not. For example, a company may use several different forecasting methods, such as statistical, judgmental, and causal forecasting. FVA can help the company determine which method is most accurate and should be used more frequently.
Tailoring FVA to Specific Industries and Companies
FVA can be tailored to specific industries and companies. For example, a manufacturing company may have different forecasting needs than a retail one. The manufacturing company may have a different process of consensus forecast than the retail one and have more/different stakeholders in that process. To tailor FVA to a specific industry or company, it's important to understand the unique characteristics of the industry or company and to tailor the analysis accordingly. This could include using industry-specific performance metrics
领英推荐
Implementation Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
Implementing FVA requires careful consideration of factors such as data availability, stakeholder buy-in, and resistance to change. Robust data collection and management processes are necessary to address data availability and quality challenges. This involves ensuring data integrity, timeliness, and completeness through data governance frameworks
Implementing FVA
Implementing FVA can be done in several ways. One way is to compare the forecast to actual sales and calculate the error. This method is known as Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Another way is to compare the forecast to a baseline forecast, such as a statistical forecast, and calculate the change in the performance metric. By combining the MAPE method with baseline forecast comparison, a comprehensive assessment of forecast accuracy can be achieved, enabling the identification of systematic biases or deficiencies
Once the FVA analysis is complete, companies can use the results to improve their forecasting process. For example, if the analysis shows that a particular step in the process is not adding value, the company can eliminate that step. If the analysis shows that a particular participant is not adding value, the company can replace that participant with someone who has more forecasting experience.
For example, in the table below, the Approved Forecast has a MAPE of 7% against the Statistical Forecast, which had 4%, the increase in error derived from the poor performance of both the Planner Overrides and Consensus Forecasts.
In cases where this FVA report is generated every month or quarter, a business can understand what the root cause is for the decrease in accuracy.
Conclusion
FVA is a powerful tool that can help companies improve their demand planning process and forecast accuracy. It involves evaluating the performance of different steps and participants in the forecasting process to determine which steps add value to the forecast and which do not. By identifying areas where the forecasting process can be improved, companies can increase the accuracy of their forecasts and better manage their operations and supply chain. With different ways of implementing FVA and different performance metrics, companies have a broader range of options to evaluate the performance of their forecasting process. Additionally, it's important to note that FVA is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and different industries and companies may have different requirements and considerations for their forecasting process. Therefore, the implementation of FVA should be tailored to the organization’s specific needs.
The Analytical Factor team specializes in providing FVA solution that is tailored to meet the specific needs of your industry and company. With our expert's help, you can easily implement FVA and see results in more accurate forecasts and better demand planning. If you want to learn more about how FVA can help your company, please contact Analytical Factor ([email protected]) today. We would be happy to discuss your specific needs and help you implement FVA in a way that meets your goals.
?
Director Emeritus at ti&oe Consulting
1 年More productive than trying to improve forecast accuracy of demand is to eliminate the need for forecasting by having a responsive supply chain. We only forecast demand because we can't provide supply as quickly as the client would like. Long lead times force us to anticipate. Anticipation is a fool's game. Don't anticipate. React. Any progress on lead time reduction will pay far greater dividends than any effort at "improving" forecast accuracy.