Maximizing Efficiency in Smart Contracts: A Journey of Optimizing Gas Usage

Maximizing Efficiency in Smart Contracts: A Journey of Optimizing Gas Usage


Code: https://github.com/DRIVENpol/master_yul/blob/main/FromZeroToOptimized.sol


In the ever-evolving world of blockchain technology, efficiency and cost-effectiveness are paramount. As developers, we are constantly challenged to optimize smart contracts to ensure they are not only functional but also economical in terms of gas usage. This article takes you through a detailed journey of optimizing a smart contract, showcasing a significant reduction in gas consumption by 19,248 units.

The Starting Point: A Non-Optimized Contract

Our journey begins with a smart contract that was, to put it mildly, far from optimized. This initial state presents an exciting opportunity to explore the various avenues of optimization and to understand the impact of each change.


Step 1: Revamping with YUL

The first step in our optimization process was to rework the contract's modifier. By recoding it in YUL, we managed to cut down the gas usage by 47 units. This might seem small, but in the world of smart contracts, every unit counts.



Step 2: Unchecked Mathematical Operations

Next, we targeted the mathematical operations within the contract. By marking these operations as 'unchecked', we bypassed the EVM's automatic overflow and underflow checks (a feature of Solidity versions 0.8.0 and above). This simple but effective change brought our total gas savings to 171 units.


Step 3: Consolidating Variables

A significant leap in gas savings was achieved by packing the 'bar' and 'owner' variables into a single slot. This step required some intricate YUL coding for read/write operations but resulted in an impressive total gas saving of 19,224 units.


Step 4: Function Modifications

The final touch in our optimization process was to make the function external and payable. The logic behind 'external' is its encompassing nature, covering both internal and external aspects unlike 'public'. Making the function 'payable' allowed us to skip the EVM's check on msg.value for non-payable functions.

Conclusion: A Triumph in Optimization

The cumulative effect of these optimizations was a reduction of 19,248 gas units. This journey not only highlights the importance of meticulous coding and an in-depth understanding of the EVM but also serves as a testament to the potential of smart contract optimization.

As blockchain technology continues to grow and evolve, such optimizations will become increasingly crucial. They not only improve the performance of individual contracts but also contribute to the overall efficiency and sustainability of blockchain networks.

Remember, in blockchain development, every bit of optimization counts towards a more efficient and cost-effective ecosystem.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Paul Socarde的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了