Maximizing 3D Printing Efficiency: It's All About Throughput, Not Just Speed

The Real Measure of 3D Printing: Throughput Over Speed

While the buzz around rapid 3D printing continues to grow, the real metric that matters is throughput. FFF 3D printing, despite its numerous advantages, can sometimes be a drawn-out manufacturing process. Prospective buyers are naturally inclined to seek the quickest system available. However, the way manufacturers discuss 'speed' often doesn't capture the actual performance variations between machines.

In the realm of FFF 3D printing, the term "print speed" typically alludes to the maximum feedrate the system achieves during extrusion. But what users genuinely care about is the time it takes to receive their finished parts. Relying solely on max feedrate as an indicator can be misleading. In fact, there can be a staggering 700–1000% cycle time difference between two machines that claim to operate at the same feedrate.

The Importance of Cycle Time in 3D Printing

FFF 3D printing is undeniably a revolutionary manufacturing tool. However, its potential is sometimes hampered by extended cycle times. The real value of faster printing becomes evident when a task that previously took three days can be completed overnight.

Benefits of reduced cycle times include:

• Enhanced strength of parts within the same cycle time.
• Feasibility of producing large, solid parts with intricate details in realistic timeframes.
• Minimized time-related costs due to errors.
• Efficient use of floor space and power.
• Reduced risk of failures from external disruptions.

Furthermore, R&D teams can experience:

• Increased willingness to experiment without the fear of time wastage.
• The possibility of daily iterations, akin to the agile software development model.
• Enhanced focus and productivity as engineers and designers remain engrossed in their tasks.

Serial production also enjoys:

• Shorter lead times, allowing for reduced inventory of printed parts.
• Enhanced customization possibilities.
• The ability to produce parts on-demand in a genuine "digital inventory" system.
• Quick production and implementation of jigs and fixtures.

Quality, Functionality, and Reliability: The Balancing Act

As you push for faster cycle times in FFF printing, there's a risk of compromising on quality. At an extreme pace, you might end up producing waste instead of usable parts. Issues that can arise include reduced resolution, decreased strength, motion system errors, extrusion problems, and overall reliability concerns.

Setting the Right Benchmarks

Relying solely on metrics like maximum feed rate and acceleration doesn't provide a comprehensive view of a machine's real-world performance. What the industry needs is a standardized speed benchmark that considers part quality and usability. This benchmark should simulate a genuine manufacturing scenario and ensure that no part of the printing system experiences fatigue during the process.

Conclusion: Speed, Reliability, and Real-World Application

For FFF 3D printing to gain widespread acceptance akin to traditional manufacturing methods, we need to focus on both speed and reliability. The industry must adopt performance specifications that resonate with manufacturers. The ultimate question is, "How many quality parts can I produce in a day?" Tools like the Many Small/One Big benchmarks and normalized cycle time can offer users a clearer understanding of system performance, steering the industry towards improvements that genuinely enhance the user experience.

For more insights and top-tier 3D printing solutions, contact us:

Phone: +4593404337

Email: [email protected]

Website: 3dverkstan.dk