Mathematics with space-time kills physics.

HISTORY REPEATED ...

In the era when the "marriage of mathematic with physics" is the space – time, many do not know what space is.

Einstein says that gravity "is born" when the substance gets into the network space – time.

And Lorenz's transformation "shows“ that a son can be a grandfather of his father and that various clocks show different times depending on the speed of movement.

We have returned to the time of the old Jews when they were making a deity-golden calf, poured out of jewelry, and begged him to deliver them from evil. These are now "Einstein′s vicious circle" and "space - time" as modern "deities", to which most of today's theoretical physicists pray...

Mathematics in real 3D space is a basic tool of science.

The problem arises when real physical experiments from 3D space are solved in a utopian 4D space that has been transformed into physics by mathematicians from past centuries: Poincare, Lorentz,…

Einstein and mathematicians brought chaos into physics. They has many non-physical bad concepts:

The definition of "local time" using the "Lorentz transformation formulas" (space-time).

The definition of "covariant equation" using "local time", and

"Lorentz transformation equations" (space-time).

The definition of "physical definition of simultaneity" using "covariant equations," "local time" and "Lorentz transformation equations" (space-time).

The definition of "invariant interval" using "physical definition of simultaneity", "covariant equations," "local time" and "Lorentz transformation formulas" (space-time).

Please take into account that the theory may be based on mathematical or physical principles.

As for mathematical theory based on mathematical principles, everything is fine.

Similarly, when it comes to physical theory based on physical principles, everything is all right.

Problems arise when it comes to physical theory based on mathematical principles - as is the case of Einstein's theory of relativity, Lorentz transformations,...

In mathematics, the Poincaré conjecture is a theorem about the characterization of the 3-sphere, which is the hypersphere that bounds the unit ball in four-dimensional space.

In 1994, Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman proved the soul conjecture. In 2003, he proved (confirmed in 2006) Thurston's geometrization conjecture. This consequently solved in the affirmative the Poincaré conjecture.

Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a mathematical theory. Why is it wrong from the point of view of physics ?

Einstein's Procedure for Synchronizing Clocks

John D. Norton

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh PA 15260. Homepage: www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton

This page (with animated figures) is available at www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies

John D. Norton's Homepage--redirect

FACTS to 1918:

6 he has stolen the work of others and has mathematized physics to such an extent that fellow physicists have been left clueless. Furthermore, the article continued, Einstein had undertaken a propaganda campaign by which he had cast a spell both over the public and over academic circles-but in reality relativity was nothing but fraud and fantasy. The author of the piece was Paul Weyland (1888-1972, figure 1), an obscure right-wing publicist and talented rabble-rouser- one of the shadier products of postwar Berlin.

8 Weyland also drew heavily on Lenard's more substantive objections to Einstein’s theory of relativity, which Lenard had published in 1918.

10 but Weyland contended that they had remained undisputed. Weyland’s shrill tone in his newspaper article and the highly public character of his accusations were indeed new, however. Also new was their thinly concealed anti-Semitic character: Weyland claimed that Einstein had “a particular press, a particular community

but Weyland contended that they had remained undisputed. Weyland’s shrill tone in his newspaper article and the highly public character of his accusations were indeed new, however. Also new was their thinly concealed anti-Semitic character: Weyland claimed that Einstein had “a particular press, a particular community [Gemeinde]” that kept feeding pro-Einstein stories to the public. enough: The widely circulating, liberal Berliner Tageblatt was published by Rudolph Mosse

FACTS (1919 - 1920) :

Professionally non educated EDITORS ( non physicists ) and private owners of newspapers perpetrate really serious immoral act in science by that it hinders its natural development and creating an deceitful picture of Albert Einstein by his glorification:

12 In 1919 it had carried an article [13 autor Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), 15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)] announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.”

16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung [17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)] carried a large close-up portrait of Einstein whose caption read: “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.”

2 The huge public acclaim that was accorded Einstein. It also vexed conservative academics (e.g. the Nobel Laureate Philipp Lenard have felt that the theoretical physicist Einstein had captured too much of the limelight, while other, experimental physicists were not appreciated enough.)

FACTS Then followed (1920):

Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting

Jeroen van Dongen

Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands

Two important and unpleasant events occurred in Albert Einstein’s life in 1920: That August an antirelativity rally was held in the large auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, and a few weeks later Einstein was drawn into a tense and highly publicized debate with Philipp Lenard on the merits of relativity at a meeting in Bad Nauheim, Germany.

73 Nonetheless, tensions had been mounting. Max Planck was firmly in the chair, but prior to the debate--because he was still not certain whether Einstein would remain in Berlin--he appeared to be quite agitated.

74 Paul Weyland also was present at the debate--but this time he kept a low profile. Einstein and his wife Elsa were strongly affected by the exchange: Elsa suffered a nervous breakdown.

75 The Viennese experimental physicist Felix Ehrenhaft (1879- 1952) recalled that he had to take a highly upset Einstein out for a calming stroll in the park after the debate. Later that evening they avoided the uneasy company of their fellow physicists.

76 Both Lenard and Einstein left the conference deeply distressed. Lenard renounced his membership in the DPG--and even denied admittance to his office at the University of Heidelberg to any of its members.

Albert Einstein und Philipp Lenard

Dr. Charlotte Sch?nbeck

P?dagogische Hochschule Heidelberg

Fakult?t für Mathematik und Naturwisse?