Marketing Mostly Fails—Which Reminds Us That Change is Rare, Difficult and Slow
Hanging With Taboo. (c) 2022

Marketing Mostly Fails—Which Reminds Us That Change is Rare, Difficult and Slow

Marketing mostly fails. Most new products fail. Most ads underperform. Most algorithms yield marginal improvement. It’s like baseball. Hall of Fame pitcher Goose Gossage said once that “baseball is a game of failure. A .300 hitter, a superstar, fails seven out of ten times.”

So what does this tell us? Gossage said it proves the “difficulty” of baseball. True of marketing, too, but this begs the question of why marketing is so difficult. The answer is that people are reluctant to change, which makes marketing failure the norm. We lose sight of this. Especially today. Technology since the mid-nineties has convinced us that constant, rapid, significant change is the natural state of the world and thus easy for any marketer to harness. Untrue. Change of any import, even over the past three digital decades, is much rarer than headlines and hype would have us believe.

The change we think we see is often a mirage, or at least not as much as we tell ourselves. Consider the thought experiments articulated separately by economists Paul Krugman and Tyler Cowen. Krugman said?think of a modern kitchen?versus the 1950s. While different, not so different that an old kitchen wouldn’t be “functional” today (meaning it wouldn’t feel out of place). Similarly, Cowen?noted?that the “basic accouterments of life have remained broadly the same” since his grandmother’s time.

The pandemic taught this lesson anew, even though a profusion of pundits declared that the world had been knocked out of its grooves forever. For example, a?prior Four Tuesday?reviewed the misguidance proffered about the ascendance of e-commerce. As?I reiterated repeatedly?during 2020, people don’t aspire to a new normal. People want to get back to normal. People resist change.

Much of our belief in accelerating change dates to the dot-com era when our enthusiasm got the better of us.?Gisle Hannemyr, co-founder of the first Norwegian ISP,?published a 2003 reality check?in?The Information Society?journal and concluded, “through careful compilation and examination of the historical record…there appear to be no major differences between the adoption rate of the Internet and the patterns of adoption we know from radio and television in the past.”

Obviously, big changes happen occasionally, and some happen fast. But as a general rule, change is rare, difficult and slow.Mostly incremental not transformational. Almost always, marketing is more about managing what we have than leapfrogging ahead to the day after tomorrow.

Samar Das, Ph.D.

CEO & Chief Research Officer at C3Research. Specializes in Marketing and Brand Strategy, Digital Media, and Healthcare Marketing Research.

2 年

Brilliant!

Heidi Therese Dangelmaier

I run a global all-girl think tank driving the next wave of Intelligence, Innovation, technology and consumer growth. 2025 GIRL BAIN ARRIVES

2 年

J. Walker Smith If you understand quantum models , change is much easier to predict and with much more precision

Lynd Bacon PhD, MBA

Quantitative Cognitive Scientist, Data Science and Analytics Expert. @[email protected] on Mastodon.

2 年

Doesn’t it seem like there are innovations all around us?

回复
Graham Staplehurst

40 years understanding brands from the consumer viewpoint; Director at Kantar BrandZ

2 年

Great thoughts as ever, Walker. And let's also consider that as well as people not wanting to change ... people really don't care about marketing; and hardly care about brands. The most successful brands are those that get you to buy them *without* thinking about it!

Julian Davies

Commercial, customer and team leader in B2B SaaS and hybrid software / professional services industry.

2 年

J. Walker Smith, thanks for sharing. Incremental gains are good! Hope you're well.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

J. Walker Smith的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了