Mapping the global impact of AI
Photo by Shane McLendon on Unsplash

Mapping the global impact of AI

Every week, I discuss the dance of technology and society with a brilliant mind. This week I had a thrilling conversation with Dr. Kate Crawford about why we should understand AI as much more than just code and algorithms: it’s really an industry built on a global network of resource extraction, human labor, and data collection. 

Kate is senior principal researcher at Microsoft Research, co-founder of AI Now and Visiting Chair for AI and Justice at the école Normale Supérieure in Paris. Her book Atlas of AI is out now. 

Below is an excerpt from our conversation. To hear the full discussion, listen here.

***

Azeem Azhar: Kate, you're very well known for a piece of work you did with Vladan Joler called The Anatomy of an A.I. System which has made it into the permanent collection of the MoMA in New York and the V&A in London. What did you learn from that project?

Kate Crawford: Anatomy of AI transformed my thinking! We mapped out what it takes to make an Amazon Echo. We researched every component. We traced the mining supply chains. We looked at smelting. We looked at container shipping. We looked at all of the data pipelines where the data is harvested from these devices and interpreted. And then we looked at the end of life where these devices are thrown into tips in places like Ghana and Pakistan, generally fewer than four years from when they were purchased! 

That project really changed my thinking: I realised we have to move away from this idea of artificial intelligence as being immaterial and abstract and in the cloud, to see it as a profoundly material technology, something that is made from the earth, from human bodies and from huge amounts of data.

No alt text provided for this image

Azeem Azhar: That’s a great overview of your thesis. At the heart of that lies a more abstract idea, which is to challenge this notion that intelligence is a thing on its own. You make a very compelling argument that the way that intelligence is thought of by the A.I. community is problematic.

Kate Crawford: There’s a sort of Cartesian dualism in artificial intelligence where minds are regarded as entirely separate from their connection to earthly bodies and states. I see this as an original sin for the field - this idea that computers are minds and that they're anything like human intelligence.

You see that when Elon Musk talks about wanting to upload his brain to the cloud. 

In actual fact, what we see with machine learning is large-scale statistical analysis, prediction and optimization. Very different to the sort of ways in which humans are in the world and think in relation to each other, in relation to their environments.

Large scale training data sets have a baked-in world view. We're getting the answers, if you will, that we already know. So I think we have to be very skeptical about these forms of ‘intelligence’ and see them as products of their time.

Listen to our full discussion here

Look forward to reading the book.

回复
Aloro Joel

IT specialist at National Cross Border Association (NCBTA)

3 年

thanks

回复
Teresa Bau Puig

Customer Success & Communications in Healthcare. Writer

3 年

Great ideas, I love your podcast Azeem!

Mohamed Camara

#Mining_Engineer, #Agent de #Développement. MERLA, Logistic and TIC Manager @CenafodGuinee, Former Specialist Governance & Civic Participation @USAID?? #NotreSante. Coach ????

3 年

Thanks for sharing we appreciate it

Chris Miller

Consultant, Emergency & Business Continuity Manager

3 年

Thanks for sharing some of your insights, Azeem Azhar and Kate Crawford. For your information too, Dr Maria Milosavljevic GAICD

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Azeem Azhar的更多文章

  • ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    ?? What's the deal with Manus AI?

    Six things you need to know to understand the hype The online discourse around Manus AI typically falls into three…

    8 条评论
  • AI’s productivity paradox

    AI’s productivity paradox

    I want to play a game of counterfactuals..

    10 条评论
  • Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Why the AI surge isn't like 1999

    Economist Paul Krugman sees parallels between the late-90s tech bubble and today’s AI frenzy. In my conversation with…

    4 条评论
  • What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    What OpenAI’s Deep research means for search

    Originally published in Exponential View on 4 February OpenAI released yet another add-on on to its growing suite of AI…

    4 条评论
  • ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    ??DeepSeek: everything you need to know right now.

    My WhatsApp exploded over the weekend as we received an early Chinese New Year surprise from DeepSeek. The Chinese AI…

    38 条评论
  • ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    ?? Stargate & DeepSeek R-1 – What matters

    In the past week, a lot was written about the US government’s “Stargate” partnership with OpenAI AND DeepSeek R-1…

    12 条评论
  • Davos Daily, Day 1

    Davos Daily, Day 1

    The energy here is different this year, so I’ll share my daily takes from the Forum to help you understand what it’s…

    6 条评论
  • ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    ?? Join me live on AI, deep tech & geopolitics

    Hi all, I am going live in two hours from DLD — one of Europe’s most important annual events focused on the…

    5 条评论
  • Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    Five contrarian ideas about genAI in the workplace

    ChatGPT alone sees over 300 million weekly users—roughly 7% of all mobile phone owners worldwide. Nearly a third of…

    13 条评论
  • ?? AGI in 2025?

    ?? AGI in 2025?

    We can't ignore Sam's bet that..

    11 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了