The Many Benefits of Robotics Education in K-12 Schools ~ Dr. Raymond J. Schmidt

The Many Benefits of Robotics Education in K-12 Schools

~ Dr. Raymond J. Schmidt

The Benefits of Robotics Education in K-12 Schools

Robotics education is rapidly gaining traction in K-12 schools, offering a wide range of benefits for students' academic and personal development (Adams, 2020). By incorporating robotics into the curriculum, schools can provide engaging, hands-on learning experiences that foster critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity skills necessary for the current and future workforce (U.S. Department of Commerce, 2021). In this article, we will explore the key benefits of robotics education in K-12 schools, supported by relevant research and examples.

Fostering Logical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills

Robotics education is instrumental in developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential for success in the 21st-century workforce. When students design and program robots, they encounter various challenges that require analytical thinking and systematic problem-solving approaches. Educational robotic designs involve students in creating, programming, setting up, and controlling robots. This activity requires the use of logical thinking and problem-solving skills, also known as computational thinking (Chevalier et al., 2020; CodeLearn, 2023). Students need to figure out how to program a robot to perform specific tasks. As they face different challenges and overcome obstacles, children learn to analyze situations, identify the best solutions, and adapt to the needs of the moment. This adaptability and reasoning ability are part of a set of fundamental skills that can be applied not only in school but also in various aspects of life (CodeLearn, 2023; Luo et al., 2021).

Encouraging Creativity and Innovation

Beyond STEM proficiency, robotics education cultivates creativity and innovation among students. The process of designing, building, and iterating robots encourages students to think creatively to overcome challenges and achieve desired outcomes. As noted by Chinn, Duncan, and Hmelo-Silver (2017), engaging in open-ended robotics projects stimulates creative thinking by allowing students to explore multiple solutions and experiment with different design possibilities. Although robotics and programming are often seen as "closed" disciplines that limit children's creativity, they actually have the opposite effect by stimulating creativity and ingenuity from the early stages of schooling (CodeLearn, 2023; Zhang & Zhu, 2022). The opportunity to design and customize their robots allows students to explore their creativity and experiment with various ideas. Educational robotics teaches young learners that there is not a single solution, and they can find different ways to achieve the desired result, encouraging them to try out all their ideas and approach challenges from different perspectives to achieve a specific goal (Avello et al., 2020; CodeLearn, 2023).

Facilitating Practical STEM Learning

One of the primary advantages of robotics education is its emphasis on hands-on STEM learning. Unlike traditional classroom settings, where theoretical knowledge is often abstract, robotics allows students to apply theoretical concepts in practical scenarios. For instance, constructing and programming a robot to navigate a maze requires students to apply principles of physics, mathematics, and computer science in a practical and tangible way. Research by Bers, Flannery, and Kazakoff (2014) supports the idea that hands-on robotics activities significantly enhance students' understanding of complex STEM concepts. By engaging in iterative design processes and troubleshooting, students not only deepen their knowledge but also develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Furthermore, students can acquire knowledge of mechanics, electronics, coding, and other STEM disciplines while interacting and having fun with robots (Ali et al., 2020; CodeLearn, 2023). It is a hands-on experience that helps improve their understanding of theoretical concepts, presents them in an engaging and motivating manner for young learners, and sparks an interest in STEM fields, steering them away from the notion that these are overly complicated subjects (CodeLearn, 2023; Rahman, 2021).

Enhancing Collaboration Skills Through Project-Based Learning

Robotics often involves project-based learning (PBL), where students work collaboratively to solve complex problems. PBL not only enhances academic achievement but also nurtures essential life skills such as teamwork, communication, and time management (Walker, 2013). In a robotics team, students assume various roles—such as programmer, builder, and strategist—learning to collaborate effectively and leverage each other's strengths. As such, robotics projects can foster teamwork skills. Children learn to communicate, collaborate, and share ideas as they work together to build and program their robots (Chen et al., 2020; CodeLearn, 2023). This collaboration can be applied in the workplace, where the ability to work as a team is essential. Additionally, this way of working also teaches them to appreciate and harness all their individual strengths to achieve common goals (Asada et al., 2021; CodeLearn, 2023).

Developing Patience, Perseverance, Confidence, and Empowerment

Designing and programming robots is not always easy. Students must face challenges and obstacles that require time and effort to overcome. This process teaches young learners the importance of patience and persistence. They learn that results are not always immediate, but with dedication and perseverance, they can overcome difficulties and achieve their goals (CodeLearn, 2023; Nievera, 2023). Moreover, robotics education promotes confidence and empowerment among students, particularly those who may have previously felt marginalized in STEM settings. As students gain proficiency in robotics skills and see their ideas come to life, they develop a sense of achievement and self-efficacy (Bandura, 2004). This confidence is crucial for encouraging continued engagement in STEM disciplines and pursuing ambitious career aspirations.

Preparing for the Future Job Market

At its core, robotics education is a powerful vehicle for teaching STEM career disciplines in an integrated and engaging manner. Students involved in robotics programs develop a deeper understanding of real-life scientific concepts through hands-on experimentation and application. According to the National Science Foundation (NSF), engaging students in robotics activities enhances their proficiency in mathematics and science by providing real-world contexts for learning (NSF, 2019). Consequently, technology plays an increasingly significant role in the job market, and robotics is part of the transformation that many jobs are undergoing. Introducing children to educational robotics from an early age provides them with a solid foundation of new knowledge that will enable them to understand and work with emerging technologies in the future (Adewusi et al., 2024; CodeLearn, 2023). The skills they can acquire through robotics, programming, and computational thinking are highly valued in an expanding range of sectors (CodeLearn, 2023; Bosman et al., 2020).

Boosting Confidence in Digital Skills

In a digitized world, having technology-related skills is essential. Educational robotics helps young learners develop confidence in their digital skills and their ability to interact with technology practically, turning them into creators rather than just consumers of technological products (CodeLearn, 2023; Dorotea et al., 2021). As children gain experience in creating and programming robots, they become more comfortable working with electronic devices and software, making them increasingly capable of facing any technological challenge (Adewusi et al., 2024; CodeLearn, 2023).

Engaging Students in Active Learning

Robotics education encourages active learning, where students are actively engaged in the learning process rather than passively receiving information (Eguchi, 2021; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). Through hands-on activities, such as building and programming robots, students develop a deeper understanding of the concepts they are learning (Cross et al., 2022; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). This active engagement leads to better retention of knowledge and improved problem-solving skills (Eguchi, 2021; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). Furthermore, robotics bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and its real-world applications. This connection is crucial for K-12 students as it demonstrates the relevance of STEM subjects in solving practical challenges. For example, designing a robot arm to perform specific tasks underscores the application of engineering principles such as mechanics and materials science.

Promoting Interdisciplinary Learning

Robotics education often involves integrating concepts from various disciplines, such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) (de Souza Almeida et al., 2020; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). By incorporating robotics into the curriculum, teachers can create interdisciplinary learning experiences that help students see the connections between different subject areas (Aguiar et al., 2023; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). This approach encourages students to think critically and apply their knowledge in real-world contexts (Aguiar et al., 2023; Leung & Ragusa, 2023).

Inspiring Future Careers in STEM Fields

Exposure to robotics education at an early age can inspire students to pursue careers in STEM fields (Leung & Ragusa, 2023; Pierce & Winzer, 2020). By engaging in robotics activities, students may discover a passion for coding, engineering, or technology and decide to pursue further education and careers in these areas (Leung & Ragusa, 2023; Pierce & Winzer, 2020). This early exposure can help address the gender gap in STEM fields by encouraging both boys and girls to explore their interests and abilities in these areas (Adewusi et al., 2024; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). Additionally, robotics education plays a pivotal role in preparing students for future careers in STEM fields and beyond. The skills acquired through robotics—technical proficiency, teamwork, creativity, and problem-solving—are highly sought after by employers in various industries. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, STEM occupations are projected to grow by 8.8% between 2020 and 2030, outpacing the overall job growth rate (U.S. Department of Commerce, 2021). Robotics education equips students with the foundational skills needed to pursue careers in fields such as robotics engineering, artificial intelligence, mechatronics, and industrial automation. Moreover, robotics education exposes students to diverse career pathways within STEM disciplines. Beyond technical roles, graduates with robotics experience may pursue careers in research and development, education, entrepreneurship, and even healthcare (Adams, 2020). This versatility expands students' career options and empowers them to make informed choices about their future endeavors.

Developing Social and Emotional Skills

Robotics education can also contribute to the development of social and emotional skills, such as communication, empathy, and emotional regulation (Bonderud, 2019; Class & Davis, 2023). When working in teams, students learn to express their ideas clearly, listen to others, and collaborate to achieve common goals (Bonderud, 2019; Dieker et al., 2022). Additionally, the process of designing and programming robots can help students develop a growth mindset, where they learn to embrace challenges and view failures as opportunities for learning and improvement (Bonderud, 2019; Class & Davis, 2023).

Fostering Inclusivity and Accessibility

Robotics education has the potential to promote inclusivity and accessibility in the classroom (Klimaitis & Mullen, 2021; Knowledge Hub, 2022). By incorporating adaptive technologies and designing robots that cater to diverse needs, teachers can ensure that all students have equal opportunities to participate and learn (Knowledge Hub, 2022). This approach not only benefits students with special needs but also fosters a culture of acceptance and understanding among all students (Klimaitis & Mullen, 2021; Knowledge Hub, 2022). Research indicates that robotics programs can increase interest and participation among underrepresented groups in STEM fields (Rosser, 2014). By creating inclusive learning environments and supporting diversity initiatives, schools can cultivate a new generation of STEM professionals who reflect the rich diversity of society.

Improving Academic Performance

Studies have shown that incorporating robotics education into the curriculum can lead to improved academic performance in various subjects (DiCiurcio, 2023;). By engaging in robotics activities, students develop a better understanding of concepts in subjects like mathematics, science, and computer science (DiCiurcio, 2023; Erko? et al., 2020). This improved understanding can translate into higher test scores and better overall academic achievement (DiCiurcio, 2023; Erko? et al., 2020). The iterative design process in robotics teaches students to evaluate solutions, identify flaws, and refine their designs—a practice akin to the engineering design cycle. This iterative approach not only improves the performance of robots but also instills resilience and perseverance in students when faced with setbacks (Bers, 2018).

Enhancing Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills

Robotics education requires students to engage in critical thinking and decision-making processes (Aguiar et al., 2023; CodeLearn, 2023). When designing and programming robots, students must analyze problems, evaluate possible solutions, and make informed decisions (Aguiar et al., 2023; CodeLearn, 2023). This practice helps students develop the ability to think critically and make well-reasoned choices, which are essential skills for success in both academic and real-world settings (CodeLearn, 2023). Moreover, robotics programming introduces students to computational thinking—a fundamental skill for understanding and solving complex problems using algorithms and logical reasoning (Wing, 2016). Through coding and debugging programs, students learn to break down problems into manageable parts, anticipate outcomes, and systematically test their solutions.

Promoting Lifelong Learning

Robotics education encourages a love of learning and a curiosity about the world around us (Cross et al., 2022; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). By engaging in robotics activities, students develop a growth mindset and a desire to continuously learn and improve (Eguchi, 2021; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). This attitude can lead to a lifelong commitment to learning and personal growth, which is crucial for success in an ever-changing world (Cross et al., 2022; Leung & Ragusa, 2023). Furthermore, robotics competitions and challenges encourage an innovation mindset. For instance, events like FIRST Robotics Competition and VEX Robotics Competition provide platforms for students to showcase their creativity and technical skills in a competitive environment. Such experiences inspire students to push boundaries, experiment with new ideas, and innovate solutions to real-world problems (Ackermann, 2018).

Conclusion

In conclusion, robotics education offers a wide range of benefits for K-12 students, from fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills to inspiring future careers in STEM fields (Chevalier et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2021; Pierce & Winzer, 2020). By incorporating robotics into the curriculum, schools can provide engaging, hands-on learning experiences that promote academic achievement, social and emotional development, and lifelong learning (Dieker et al., 2022; Eguchi, 2021; Erko? et al., 2020). As technology continues to advance, the importance of robotics education will only grow, and schools must adapt to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of the future (Ali et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020; Zhang & Zhu, 2022).

References

Ackermann, J. (2018). The impact of robotics competitions on STEM education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(3), 208-220.

Adams, J. (2020). Robotics in education: A review of educational robotics research, 1998–2019. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(3), 259-287.

Adewusi, O. E., Al Hamad, N. M., Ayeni, O. O., Chisom, O. N., & Unachukwu, C. C. (2024). The impact of robotics clubs on K-12 students' interest in STEM careers. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(1), 361-367.

Aguiar, M. L., Antunes, R., & Gaspar, P. D. (2023). A dynamic STEM-driven approach through mobile robotics to enhance critical thinking and interdisciplinary skills for empowering industry 4.0 competencies. Technologies, 11(6), 170.

Ali, M., Aliyu, F., Aliyu, H., Anggoro, S., Maimun, A., Malik, A., & Talib, C. A. (2020). Integration of robotics into STEM education for facilitating environmental sustainability. Solid State Technology, 63(1), 767-783.

Asada, H. H., Ng, J., Selby, N. S., Stump, G. S., Traweek, C., & Westerman, G. (2021). TeachBot: Towards teaching robotics fundamentals for human-robot collaboration at work. Heliyon, 7(7).

Avello, R., Lavonen, J., & Zapata-Ros, M. (2020). Coding and educational robotics and their relationship with computational and creative thinking. A compressive review. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 20(63).

Bandura, A. (2004). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.

Bers, M. U. (2018). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L. P., & Kazakoff, E. R. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157.

Bonderud, D. (2019). How k–12 classrooms can benefit from robotics: New pedagogies require new tools, and robots are turning out to be the engagement tool teachers have been looking for. EdTech, Focus on K-12.

Bosman, L., Harrell, S., Krause, L., Serban, S., & Strimel, G. J. (2020). The next generation for manufacturing competitiveness?: Investigating the influence of industry-driven outreach on children career perceptions. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3, 232-258.

Chen, C. H., Huang, K., Yang, C. K., & Yao, K. C. (2020). Augmented reality and competition in robotics education: Effects on 21st century competencies, group collaboration and learning motivation. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 1052-1062.

Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Mondada, F., & Piatti, A. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-18.

Chinn, C. A., Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2017). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2016). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.

Class, M., & Davis, P. M. (2023). Educational robots for social and emotional learning. AI, Computer Science and Robotics Technology, (13).

CodeLearn. (2023). 7 benefits of educational robotics. Computational Thinking.

Cross, J., Rogers, C., Sinapov, J., Willner-Giwerc, S., & Zhang, Z. (2022). An interactive robot platform for introducing reinforcement learning to k-12 students. In Robotics in Education: RiE 2021 12 (pp. 288-301). Springer International Publishing.

de Souza Almeida, L. M., Kaipa, K., Kidd, J., & Sacks, S. (2020). Introducing coding into teacher education: an interdisciplinary robotics experience for education and engineering students. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1319-1326). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

DiCiurcio, A. (2023). How robots are helping better K–12 schools: Under the CTO’s leadership, Grapevine-Colleyville independent school district students learn practical technology skills that lower the district’s bottom line. EdTech Magazine. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2023/08/how-robots-are-helping-better-k-12-schools .

Dieker, L. A., Glavey, E. M., Hines, R. A., Hughes, C. E., Ingraham, K., Taylor, M. S., & Wilkins, I. (2022). RAISE: Robotics & AI to improve STEM and social skills for elementary school students. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 968312.

Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Piedade, J. (2021). Mapping K-12 computer science teacher’s interest, self-confidence, and knowledge about the use of educational robotics to teach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 443.

Eguchi, A. (2021). Key factors for keeping students engaged in robotics learning. In Robotics in Education: Methodologies and Technologies (pp. 38-48). Springer International Publishing.

Erko?, M. F., Kert, S. B., & Yeni, S. (2020). The effect of robotics on six graders’ academic achievement, computational thinking skills and conceptual knowledge levels. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100714.

Klimaitis, C. C., & Mullen, C. A. (2021). Including K-12 students with disabilities in STEM education and planning for inclusion. Educational Planning, 28(2), 27-43.

Knowledge Hub. (2022). Importance of Robotics In Education. Knowledge Hub. https://knowledge-hub.com/2022/05/20/importance-of-robotics-in-education/ .

Leung, L., & Ragusa, G. (2023). The impact of early robotics education on students' understanding of coding, robotics design, and interest in computing careers. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 23(23), 9335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239335 .

Luo, R., Yin, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Educational robots improve K-12 students’ computational thinking and STEM attitudes: Systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1450-1481.

National Science Foundation (NSF). (2019). The role of out-of-school time in STEM learning. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1440988 .

Nievera, M. A. (2023). Teachers of today make a better tomorrow: Teachers’ values in teaching robotics to pre-k students experiencing homelessness. Master's Thesis, Tufts University.

Pierce, T., & Winzer, R. (2020). STEM outreach: Inspiring the pre-college generation. The Midwest Quarterly, 61(3), 380-387.

Rahman, S. M. (2021). Assessing and benchmarking learning outcomes of robotics-enabled stem education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 84.

Rosser, S. V. (2014). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, 04-11.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (2021). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Retrieved from https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2021-10/2021-10-08-STEM-Occupations-Past-Present-and-Future.pdf .

Walker, A. (2013). Engaging minds: Cultures of education and practices of teaching. Education Review, 55(1), 114-117.

Wing, J. M. (2016). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Effects of educational robotics on the creativity and problem-solving skills of K-12 students: A meta-analysis. Educational Studies, 1-19.