Manufacturing Innovation Programs Across the Atlantic (Part 2)
1. Introduction
In our previous exploration of global funding ecosystems, we examined the structures supporting research and innovation in the United States and European Union. We found that the U.S. system relies on a mix of federal, state, and private funding, while the EU emphasizes cross-border collaboration through programs like Horizon Europe. Now, we'll focus on a key sector for both economies: manufacturing.
Manufacturing is crucial for technological progress and economic growth. In the U.S., manufacturing contributes 11% of GDP and employs over 12.5 million workers, according to the National Association of Manufacturers. Similarly, the European Commission reports that manufacturing accounts for 16% of the EU's GDP and employs more than 32 million people.
Advanced manufacturing technologies are increasingly important for addressing global challenges. Research published by UNIDO shows how these technologies can help achieve the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, particularly in sustainable industrialization and innovation.
Let's examine how ManufacturingUS and Horizon Europe, - Cluster 4 are shaping the future of manufacturing through their funding and collaboration strategies.
2. ManufacturingUS Bolsters American Industry
2.1. Structure and Key Components
ManufacturingUS consists of two main initiatives:
2.2. Main Goals and Focus Areas
ManufacturingUS aims to boost U.S. manufacturing competitiveness through technology innovation and workforce development. Key areas include:
A Deloitte and Manufacturing Institute report highlights the importance of these focus areas in addressing the projected shortage of 2.1 million skilled manufacturing jobs by 2030.
2.3. Funding Approach
ManufacturingUS uses various funding mechanisms:
The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 authorized up to $700 million in federal funds for Manufacturing USA, to be matched by non-federal sources.
2.4. Case Study – Advancing Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
The National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL) demonstrates ManufacturingUS's impact. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NIIMBL accelerated the development of diagnostic tests, therapeutic antibodies, and vaccines.
One notable project, funded by an $8.9 million NIIMBL grant, led to the creation of a rapid, low-cost COVID-19 test. This collaboration between the University of Delaware and Siemens Healthineers resulted in a test providing results in under 10 minutes, showcasing the potential of advanced manufacturing techniques in addressing urgent health challenges.
?
3. Horizon Europe, (Cluster 4) Spurs European Industrial Growth
3.1. Position within Horizon Europe
Horizon Europe, the EU's primary research and innovation funding program, is organized into three pillars and six clusters. Cluster 4: Digital, Industry and Space falls under Pillar II, "Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness". This cluster is key to advancing Europe's industrial strategy, focusing on green and digital transitions.
With €15.3 billion allocated for 2021-2027, Cluster 4 represents a significant portion of Horizon Europe's €95.5 billion total budget, reflecting the EU's commitment to technological innovation and industrial competitiveness.
3.2. Primary Objectives
Cluster 4 aims to transform European industry for a sustainable, digital, and resource-efficient future. Its main goals include:
These objectives align with the European Green Deal and the EU's Digital Strategy, working towards making Europe climate-neutral by 2050 while ensuring digital sovereignty.
ManufacturingUS builds on 51 MEP centers and 16 manufacturing institutes across the country, yet EU's HaDEA (Cluster 4) uses project teams that form and disband based on specific calls for proposals.
3.3. Funding Strategy
Horizon Europe uses a competitive grant funding approach to encourage collaborative innovation across borders. Key features include:
3.4. Case Study – Revolutionizing Steel Production with Green Hydrogen
The H2FUTURE project, funded by Horizon 2020 (Horizon Europe's predecessor), showcases the program's impact. This €18 million initiative, supported by the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU), aims to produce green hydrogen for steel production.
Led by a consortium including Voestalpine, Siemens, VERBUND, and research partners, H2FUTURE has implemented a 6MW PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzer at a steelworks in Linz, Austria. This installation, one of the largest of its kind globally, can produce up to 1,200 m3 of green hydrogen per hour.
By replacing coal with green hydrogen in steel production, H2FUTURE paves the way for significant CO2 emission reductions in one of Europe's most energy-intensive sectors. This aligns with Cluster 4's goals of climate-neutral production and increased autonomy in strategic value chains.
?
4. Comparing ManufacturingUS and Horizon Europe, (Cluster4)
4.1. Structural Approaches
ManufacturingUS and Horizon Europe, HaDEA use different approaches to foster innovation:
ManufacturingUS operates through physical institutes and centers:
Horizon Europe uses a project-based funding model:
These differences reflect each region's context. The U.S. approach builds on existing industrial strengths and geographic distribution, while the EU model promotes flexibility and cross-border collaboration.
领英推荐
4.2. Focus Areas and Priorities
Both initiatives address similar global challenges with different emphases:
ManufacturingUS priorities:
Horizon Europe, Cluster 4 priorities:
Both target advanced manufacturing and sustainability (prioritizing their gaps), yet ManufacturingUS emphasizes workforce development and domestic supply chains. Horizon Europe, Cluster 4 focuses more on digital transformation and strategic autonomy, reflecting the EU's Digital Strategy and Industrial Strategy.
"The H2FUTURE steel plant in Linz makes 1,200 cubic meters of green hydrogen per hour through EU funding, while ManufacturingUS helps small local manufacturers add robots and digital tools to their production lines."
4.3. Funding Landscapes
The funding landscapes differ in scale and accessibility:
ManufacturingUS:
Horizon Europe, HaDEA:
Accessibility:
4.4. Collaboration Models
Both initiatives emphasize collaboration but with different approaches:
ManufacturingUS:
Horizon Europe, Cluster 4:
For example, the NIIMBL institute under ManufacturingUS brought together over 150 members from industry, academia, and government to advance biopharmaceutical manufacturing. In contrast, Horizon Europe projects like H2FUTURE involve partners from multiple EU countries, combining diverse expertise to tackle complex challenges.
The EU's approach to international cooperation is outlined in its Strategy for International Cooperation in Research and Innovation, which aims to maintain the EU's global leadership in research and innovation while promoting its values and interests.
?
5. Maximizing Your Chances for Funding Success
5.1. Tips for Navigating ManufacturingUS
5.2. Strategies for Success with Horizon Europe, Cluster 4
5.3. Choosing the Right Program
Consider ManufacturingUS if:
Consider Horizon Europe, Cluster 4 if:
For projects with global potential:
Remember, success often requires persistence and adaptability. Don't hesitate to seek expert advice or contact program officers for clarification on specific opportunities.
?
6. The Future of Manufacturing Innovation Funding
6.1. Emerging Trends
Several key trends are shaping the future of manufacturing innovation:
6.2. Opportunities for Transatlantic Collaboration
Despite their structural differences, ManufacturingUS and Horizon Europe, Cluster 4 offer opportunities for transatlantic collaboration:
6.3. Roadmap to Manufacturing Innovation Funding
With the understanding these key points and staying tuned to the evolving landscape of manufacturing innovation funding, researchers and organizations can position themselves to make significant contributions to the future of manufacturing on both sides of the Atlantic and beyond.
Intéressant