Mandatory animal welfare labelling is a win for British farmers and consumers

Mandatory animal welfare labelling is a win for British farmers and consumers

The Government's recently published food strategy offers hope of some progressive food and farming policies and, with more enthusiasm and pace of change, I’m optimistic the retail sector can do what it takes to help transform the food system for the better.

The government’s food Paper will perhaps have presented more questions than answers this week and not just among health campaigners but farmers too. Phrases like “more domestically sourced food”, “investment into agricultural innovation and technology” and “additional seasonal workers” will provide some encouragement. But many will rightly remain sceptical until they see detail and action.

One of the proposals I am particularly pleased to see in the Paper is mandatory animal welfare labelling for domestic and imported products being improved and expanded so the public can see how and where food was produced and, most importantly, whether it meets the high standards that our farmers produce to. Shoppers may question why they should care about this given the current financial pressures, but it is significant and here’s why.

For decades, we have adopted higher farming and welfare standards at Waitrose, not because it gives us an advantage commercially but because we're a purpose led organisation and we think it’s the right thing to do. It gives animals a better quality of life, our farmers pride and happiness and, because better standards necessitate better farming practices, it can help reduce our impact on the environment, too.?

You can design food systems to deliver the lowest possible cost and not care or value the planet or the well-being of the people and animals involved in it. In fact, inadvertently, that’s exactly how many of the food systems that supply UK consumers work today. But there’s no such thing as low price with no consequences.?

Large parts of the food supply chain are still reliant on agricultural practices that put the lowest possible cost ahead of even the most basic standards of animal welfare. Farming to higher standards does increase the cost of production and that inevitably leads to a higher shelf price, but I think more and more the British public care about the standards their food has been farmed to. We believe the food system in the UK needs to be efficient AND sustainable.?

We are a business driven by purpose and try to think long term in everything we do. We think that’s why our customers choose to shop with us. Better and better informed about the reality of the food system and the need for change, I firmly believe there is a growing majority looking for ways to do the right thing. If that’s true then it’s crucial food customers are equipped with good and reliable information. Clear animal welfare labelling would help customers make informed choices, improve the transparency of UK supply chains and help avoid the risk of our farmers' standards being undercut by lower welfare imports.

No alt text provided for this image

Re-visiting the food strategy briefly again, another of the recommendations that didn’t make it through as proposed by the government’s food strategy advisor, Henry Dimbleby, was a call for a reduction in UK meat production of 30%. This is no small thing, but we're clear that the goal isn’t to stop meat production entirely. The goal is to support a more balanced diet, for example where someone might shift from eating meat six or seven times a week to having it a few times a week, eating better meat in addition to more plant based foods, plant protein, wholegrains and veg.?

Choosing “Less but Better” meat again requires a reliable and transparent welfare labelling scheme. If shoppers can clearly see where their food has come from and the conditions it was farmed to, they can make better, more informed choices. We have seen clear evidence with eggs and the wide adoption of a free range standard that this has provided the tipping point for a shift in consumer demand for higher welfare products.?

So the signs are positive and we will continue to take bold action for people, animals and the planet. My hope is that the government continues to find ways to champion British farming at the heart of our food system. There are many open doors the Government could push including the Compassion in World Farming honest labelling framework, as CIWF has decades of expertise as an independent champion of farm animal welfare.

Waitrose was again named Best Retailer for farm animal welfare in CiWF’s 2022 awards this week, as well as Best Retailer Innovation for our work with Scotland’s Rural College to roll out a ground breaking animal welfare assessment tool. I think that gives us some credibility when talking about why transparent food labelling is so important, and why it’s such an important step towards the type of behavioural shift needed among food retailers to create a better and happier world for all.

Paul Mead

Amateur Naturalist

1 年

80% of the British public are in favour of food labelling, the UK is recovering from the Coronavirus pandemic. It’s cause a zoonotic disease linked to a food market, I would have thought it was imperative that the UK government would have thought that food labelling would have been it's highest priority. With the meat slaughterhouses & processing plants being on the 'frontline' of the pandemic, it is of the utmost importance that the UK consumers are given the most pertinent up to date information about the origin & welfare of the meat purchased. Mandatory labelling of products allows the consumer to make an informed choice about the products their buying. Labels would state Animal welfare Methods of production Method of slaughter

回复
Steve Nicholson

Co-founder @databonds | Data | Technology | Retail | FMCG | Oxford MBA | FCMA

1 年

James Bailey disappointed to hear the government u-turn on this that you wrote about. i think we at databonds can help drive consumer education and change on this as well as other challenges where labelling just doesn't exist (like Co2 impact)... be great to discuss.

回复
Rosamund Heathcote

Founder & Managing Director proud to run a Certified B Corporation ?

2 年

Fantastic news!!

回复
Matthew Byrne

Chairman at Publisher Discovery

2 年

Thank you for a really encouraging article. Greengage AgriTech, based at Edinburgh University, are at the forefront of delivering systems for real-time monitoring of poultry and pig welfare. Measurements of animal behaviour are taken every 15 minutes and help provide the farmer with early stage interventions to improve welfare. https://greengage.global

  • 该图片无替代文字
Moira Howie

Independent Scientific Adviser

2 年

Great article. Helping consumers to understand the importance of higher welfare standards for animals is a key pillar of a more sustainable diet. Thankyou #Waitrose for all your work in continuing to support British livestock.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了