Managing the Split Personality of Leadership

Managing the Split Personality of Leadership

An Idea for Consideration

I planned on writing about something completely different this week, but Saturday evening's event at the Trump rally changed that plan. Some short reflections:?

1. Great leadership requires knowing history.

Saturday’s news felt shocking, and much of the commentary alluded to the moment's uncertainty. However, I was thinking about Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio’s point in his book Principles about how history repeats itself—that “almost all ‘cases at hand’ are just ‘another one of those.’” His point was that very little is unprecedented, and studying the examples of others can provide patterns to follow even when a situation is new to us.

General Jim Mattis made a similar point in Call Sign Chaos, “If you haven’t read hundreds of books, learning from others who went before you, you are functionally illiterate—you can’t coach and you can’t lead. History lights the often dark path ahead; even if it’s a dim light, it’s better than none.”

In moments of uncertainty, those who can frame the experience and start to point the way forward will be more effective than those who are figuring things out for the first time.?

[In this case, the historical similarities to 1968 are eerie—an election year in which there were questions about whether the incumbent could stand for reelection, campus protests over war, a Robert F. Kennedy on the ballot, political violence, and a Democratic National Convention in the city of Chicago.]


2. A crisis plan requires practice.

Because Saturday’s shooting happened near an open microphone, the audio of the U.S. Secret Service response is incredible. One thing that stands out is that barely anyone is yelling or trying to figure out what to do.?

On NBC, former Secret Service agent Evy Poumpouras described what happened: “The communication is very clear and succinct. ‘Can we move?’ ‘Are we clear?’ You hear, ‘Shooter’s down,’ and you hear, ‘Are we clear to move?’ [...] When it comes to comms, you always want to say less. You can hear them using very simple words—three, four words. They just want to keep those airwaves clear so that the most important vital communication can pass.”?

Practice is the key to achieving that coordinated response to a crisis. This is why schools conduct fire drills. In contrast, many organizations with crisis plans have only that—plans. But if a crisis came, they would have difficulty implementing those plans quickly because they never practiced what the plans imagined.


3. You have to manage the split personality of leadership.

In college, I served as president of our black students' association. One consequence of that experience was that I occasionally received hate mail.?

It was terrifying the first time it happened. But when I talked to the university police, they helped me realize that the hate mail was not for me as an individual—it was aimed at the person in the position. I stopped receiving those messages once I was no longer in the role.?

It was ultimately a lesson that leadership requires putting yourself “out there”—with the personal safety, ego, and emotional implications of being visible and subject to the evaluation of others. And unless you have no regard for the feelings or judgments of others, leading requires figuring out how to reconcile the very personal and emotional challenges of being exposed to others with the fact that the downsides of that exposure aren’t necessarily related to you as an individual.

For example, it’s probably not fun for President Biden to endure constant scrutiny and questioning of his mental faculties. Yet, he still needs to wake up each day and be ready to present himself to the public, knowing there would be none of that very personal criticism if he were a private citizen.

I once attended a talk by a former CEO of Lenovo, who described the emotional adjustments he had to make after being fired. He reflected that people flatter you and cater to your wishes as CEO, which starts to creep into your ego. Once you’re out of the CEO chair, you realize that others only did those things because of the seat you occupied, not because of you.

I have a client who is the CEO of a large nonprofit. She told me that a critical maturation point for her as a leader came when she was at a staff holiday party and realized that no one would have fun while she was there. At first, it felt like a personal rebuke, but then she realized it did not matter how fun her personality was because people were not interacting with her. They were interacting with the boss.?

Obviously, political leadership is the ultimate form of exposure and has a much higher personal safety risk from being physically exposed. But Saturday’s events are just the far edge of that leadership exposure. Many of my clients’ challenges relate to all the emotional exposures they face as leaders. It’s challenging because you’re the one experiencing being shot at—metaphorically, in most cases—even if it’s not you who is being targeted.


Something Fun

When I was a kid, my grandfather had a train set in the basement of his house. The one rule: never touch it. I once asked my uncle, who must have been well into his 40s by then, and he said that he was never allowed to play with his father’s train set either. I thought having a toy and not letting kids play with it was absurd.

But I recently bought some Legos to spark creativity. Not surprisingly, my kids asked if they could play with them. At that moment, I realized why my grandfather held his stance on the train set. I told them, “Under no circumstances should you touch my Legos. You’ll lose them and mess up what I’m doing.”

Ultimately, they won. I had to buy more Legos and took them to the Lego store with me, so they got their own sets.

Thanks for reading!

Charles



Get Monday Musings in Your Inbox

I publish this blog series each Monday. Like this one, it’ll contain something useful and something fun to start your week. If you want to receive Monday Musings in your inbox, subscribe here!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Moore的更多文章

  • Valuing Multiple Realities

    Valuing Multiple Realities

    An Idea for Consideration On Friday afternoon, I received this text message alert from the DC police department: “MPD…

  • You Already Know Enough to Act

    You Already Know Enough to Act

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I attended a dinner with a group of executives. The conversation turned to what…

    1 条评论
  • Is It an Asteroid or Meteor?

    Is It an Asteroid or Meteor?

    An Idea for Consideration What’s the difference between an asteroid and a meteor? I asked myself that question this…

  • Normalizing (the Right Kind of) Experimentation

    Normalizing (the Right Kind of) Experimentation

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I wrote about the power of resets. At the end of the post, I mentioned that a…

    1 条评论
  • The Power of a Reset

    The Power of a Reset

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I talked about how I had been preparing for the move and staging our new house for…

    1 条评论
  • Moving & Experimentation

    Moving & Experimentation

    On Friday, my wife and I bought a new house. In many ways, this was accidental.

    1 条评论
  • Creating Dissatisfaction with the Status Quo

    Creating Dissatisfaction with the Status Quo

    An Idea for Consideration I co-lead a course on leading change at Georgetown’s Center for Nonprofit Leadership. I…

  • Competitive Child Rearing and the Exhausting Life

    Competitive Child Rearing and the Exhausting Life

    For the past couple of months, I’ve made it a habit to ask friends with adult children for their reflections on…

    2 条评论
  • Experimenting with the Sabbath

    Experimenting with the Sabbath

    “Remember to observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days a week are set apart for your daily duties and…

    1 条评论
  • The Get-To : Have-To Ratio

    The Get-To : Have-To Ratio

    An Idea for Consideration In last week’s post, I argued that work-life balance challenges result from a lopsided ratio…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了