Managing Schdeule Risk

Managing Schdeule Risk

Cost and schedule risk management must be addressed for any project to succeed. Without margin, the project schedule and cost estimates will be late and over budget before starting.

Here are some clips from a recent week-long training session on a defense program for getting the Control Account Managers up to speed on what Program Controls do while developing the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB).

Let's start with the fundamental principle of programmatic risk management. We must clearly understand the risks and how to deal with them. This means seeking out all possible risk, from the Known obvious ones (which are likely to be issues instead of risks) to the Unknown risks. Only if the risk is Unknown do we stop searching for possible risks on mission-critical projects. If you say there are unknown unknowns, the project should have a fail-safe mode. This is usually "handled" by a cancellation and a project restart.

There are many kinds of programmatic risk, as well as all the technical risks. Seeking and managing technical risks is for another time, but here is a start on programmatic risks.

When we place these programmatic risks in the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), they look like this: This example looks at duration risk. Remember, any single point is wrong without a statement of the variance. (Hence, the single-point estimate.) Developing the upper and lower limits of the defined probability distribution is another topic. For now, let's assume we have all three pieces of information.

When we run the Monte Carlo simulator, we get outputs like this: The Probability Distribution Function (PDF) of the possible task durations generated by the Monte Carlo tool. The Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) shows the probability of completing a task "on or before" a date and its probability value.

So now we need to define a schedule margin to "protect" the deliverable. This is done by running the Monte Carlo tool with all the schedule margins removed - a zero slack deterministic schedule - and watching the desired deliverable date to see where it says the probability of completion is. In the world we work, an 80% confidence of completing "on or before" the desired date is common. The duration between the probabilistic date (80% confidence) and the deterministic date (zero slack) is the needed margin (probabilistic value) to "protect" that date.

This margin can be placed "in line." If a risk is named in the Risk Registry, Plan B for that deliverable is placed in the IMS once the Risk Management Board (RMB) accepts it. This is shown below.

When Plan B is turned to "execute," the IMS must have already planned for this, as shown above. But if the margin is not used, the risk, although planned, never comes true, and the IMS needs to absorb the unused risk margin for the future. This means moving unused margin forward. If this margin can not be moved forward, then the IMS will probably not be well structured, and some re-planning will be needed.

Here's a Compendium of Risk Management Resources

And our Risk Management book

And a collection of Risk Management briefings

Lukas A. Edwards

Civil Engineer B.Eng (Civil & Urban) Pr.Eng / Project Manager (EUP)

1 个月

Minor mistake in Heading.

  • 该图片无替代文字
回复
Mike Bissonette MS, MBA, PfMP

Project, Program, Portfolio Management Authority, Instructor, Best-Selling Author, Open to Consulting

2 个月

Glen, you need to try Chrono - an add-in to MS Project that does this with ease! We (RTConfidence) have automated it and adapted it for EVM as well using several customized Expert Systems. Let me know if you are interested. We are preparing for a major release this month.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Glen Alleman MSSM的更多文章

  • Quote of the Day

    Quote of the Day

    For the sake of persons of different types, scientific truth should be presented in different forms and should be…

    1 条评论
  • The Fallacy of the Iron Tiangle

    The Fallacy of the Iron Tiangle

    The classic Iron Triangle of lore - Cost, Schedule, and Quality- has to go. The House Armed Services Committee (HASC)…

    4 条评论
  • Why Projects Fail - The Real Reason

    Why Projects Fail - The Real Reason

    At the Earned Value Analysis 2 Conference in November of 2010, many good presentations were given on applying Earned…

    2 条评论
  • Quote of the Day - Risk

    Quote of the Day - Risk

    The real trouble with this world of ours is not that it is an unreasonable world, nor even that it is a reasonable one.…

    6 条评论
  • An Important Newsletter in Our Time of Disinformation

    An Important Newsletter in Our Time of Disinformation

    According to the RAND Report, Truth Decay, Disinformation is Misinformation with Malice. Here's a Harvard Kennedy…

    2 条评论
  • Book of the Month

    Book of the Month

    With the end of the Cold War, the triumph of liberal democracy was believed to be definitive. Observers proclaimed the…

    2 条评论
  • Quote of the Day

    Quote of the Day

    For the sake of persons of different types, scientific truth should be presented in different forms and should be…

    2 条评论
  • 1 - Capabilities of a Digital Engineering System

    1 - Capabilities of a Digital Engineering System

    Digital Engineering leverages digital tools, technologies, and methodologies to enhance complex systems' design…

  • Building a Risk-Tolerant Schedule

    Building a Risk-Tolerant Schedule

    Technical and programmatic disruptions in project plans don’t need to negatively impact cost, performance, or schedule…

  • Quote of the Day

    Quote of the Day

    It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了