Managing Public Expectations: You are not a human punching bag!

Managing Public Expectations: You are not a human punching bag!

Once the drama and excitement of a controversial election is behind, elected officials are expected to make good decisions based on what is in the best interest of the community. The community deserves to have the confidence that their elected leaders are demonstrating optimism in the future and making decisions for the greater good of the place they love to call home.?However, it appears that we live in a world where incivility in the political arena is not only tolerated but expected. No one enjoys subjecting themselves to a borage of uninformed, opinionated, unresearched malicious commentary from the side lines. It can create feelings of anxiety for even the most resilient of leaders. More importantly, it can erode sound decision making.

Public expectations are growing, while budgets are tight and resources are limited.?How do local politicians engage citizens without undermining their mandate to govern? How do they represent their constituents with diverging interests??How do they manage the resistance to change when decisions that please some will be sure to frustrate others??Grappling with difficult decisions, elected officials need to understand the value of differentiated leadership skills and how it relates to citizen and politician engagement.?The differentiated leader as one who is able to stay connected to the people they lead without being overly responsive to their every whim. In dealing with diverse perspectives of their citizens, politicians must strike a balance between meaningful community engagement and good governance by moving towards differentiated leadership.

Too many governing bodies hesitate to take unpopular steps for fear of losing popularity.?They are so sensitive of public scrutiny that they are overly responsive to criticism.?When the anxiety of disappointing others takes precedent over implementing a long-term vision, boards and councils can become hesitant to make decisions and eventually become immobilized.?Differentiated leaders are able to take legitimate community needs and concerns into account before decisions are finalized without being held hostage by dissenting voices. Differentiation does not mean being disconnected.?It is staying engaged, welcoming dissent, and not over reacting to it.?The key is to be connected with the people, but not to base one’s decisions on other’s emotional reaction to them.

Other elected officials behave as if they were anointed instead of elected.?They disengage from their constituents, especially during times of conflict or tension.?Leaders may be tempted to ease their own discomfort by ignoring their critics. They do not like to be questioned, and they are not interested in any one else’s opinion. The danger in political life is that it can lead to a real misuse of power and influence. An indifferent, controlling, or defensive leader jeopardizes attempts to share valuable information and misses the opportunity for meaningful dialogue that leads to good decision making. It can make for short sighted, narrow minded decisions that can result in serious long term consequences.?We have all witnessed the aftermath parochialism in both the corporate arena as well as public office.

?Can this problem be addressed differently? Yes, by approaching education and engagement opportunities with a willingness to listen and to learn. Educating constituents and making them aware of the complexity of the work of elected officials and their duties to the community as a whole is a worthwhile endeavour but it doesn’t stop there.?Active participation of residents and government in engagement activities helps a community access local knowledge, and it builds a common language to enable citizens to both understand their own challenges and solve their own problems. Public engagement is based on the premise that communities themselves have an intrinsic way of knowing what the issues are and how to deal with them. That being said, it is messy and uncomfortable.?But as daunting, time consuming and ambiguous as it can be, education and engagement practices are a sign of a healthy community and a thriving democracy.?They build trust between elected officials and their citizens and let’s face it, there is no more critical factor in leadership credibility than trust.

Because trust grows when opposition is not feared, authentic community engagement that builds trust also embraces conflict. There is a delicate balance between not only bringing people together to create a process that builds inclusion, but also to make room for dissent as well. Differentiated leaders see conflict as normal and healthy, and they welcome differences in values and opinions. They listen not necessarily to agree, but seek to understand another’s point of view as well as being open to change.?

Communities are complex, and numerous local issues involve a wide range of stakeholders with distinct views and diverse areas of interest. Community consultation should be guided by common values and not by politics. Decision-making should not be driven by a desire to avoid public backlash, but by a commitment to make the right decision for the community as a whole. It is crucial to develop a meaningful process where people are heard and their voice makes a difference. Creating spaces where authentic listening and dialogue can take place builds trust and increases participation in engagement activities. It is widely known that when people have opportunities to contribute to the decisions that affect their lives, they are more likely to support these decisions over the long-term.?However, it must be understood that principles, such as affordability, enforceability, sustainability, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and consistency with a long-term strategic direction, may override community input.?It takes courage and keen awareness of the leader’s ultimate responsibility to balance public involvement with the authority to govern.?Within any organization, the task of the governing body is to model self-regulation through a composed and calm presence.

Given the ever-shifting realities of local government, differentiated leadership is more critical than ever.?Local government is a community effort that requires a team approach, and its leaders and citizens have a reciprocal responsibility to one another. The community is well served when their elected officials are grounded, mature, and open to differing perspectives while maintaining a clearly articulated long term vision and course of action. ?

#localgovernment #leadership #civicleadership

The one thing it was vague about was the expectations for government to produce results, to remember whose money it is working with, and the expectations for local leaders and government employees to be competent in skills and judgment necessary to produce results that make a meaningful difference to the community as a whole. I live in a place that focuses on the dedication and the hard work of our leaders as worthy of our support, without judging their performance in terms of results.? This would never fly in the private sector, where businesses expect results in profits and growth, and the need to change, learn and value excellence as a standard.

回复
Joy Guyot

From Entrepreneur to Empowerment: Leading the Charge in Business and Local Government

2 年

This article is something I will continue to read over and over.

回复
Lilia Hansen

Mayor - City of Fort St. John

2 年

Well timed article.

Grace Van den Brink

BC Government - retired Sr. Program Analyst

2 年

Good article! Not a local government official but think this is good advice for other circumstances, e.g. boards and working groups. Would also like to share this with the newly elected council here (along with the info on LGLA's Elected Official Seminars)!

Katie Hodder, MA., Leadership, BCST

Scholar-practitioner focused on children, youth and families

2 年

This will stay with me ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Christina Benty的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了