Managing Performance & the Mindset that Makes it Work!

Revolutionizing Performance Management: A Historical Perspective

The journey of performance management has been transformative, beginning with Peter F. Drucker's introduction of Management by Objectives (MBOs) in 1954. Drucker's revolutionary concept empowered managers and employees to collaboratively set and achieve specific goals, laying the foundation for modern performance management. The 1960s saw further innovation with Smith and Kendall's Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS), which emphasized rating performance based on specific, observable behaviors linked to various performance levels.

The 1980s and 1990s brought significant advancements with the advent of 360° feedback surveys, which provided comprehensive feedback from multiple sources, enhancing self-awareness and development. In 1992, Kaplan and Norton introduced the Balanced Scorecard, a strategic planning tool that linked performance metrics to organizational objectives, thereby aligning individual performance with broader business goals. More recently, John Doerr (inspired by Andy Grove) popularized Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), emphasizing clear objectives and measurable outcomes. The rise of Agile and Continuous Performance Management philosophies reflects the need for flexibility, continuous feedback, and iterative goal setting in today's dynamic business environment.

Transforming Performance Management: From Traditional Mindsets to Strategic Excellence

Performance management (PM) is not merely a tool for evaluating past performance but a strategic process that aligns an organization’s strategy with its execution. When done effectively, PM creates a competitive advantage by enabling an organization and its employees to achieve their strategic objectives. Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a seminal figure in quality management, highlighted ‘Seven Deadly Diseases’ in his 1982 book "Out of the Crisis." He criticized traditional performance evaluations for promoting short-term thinking, fostering fear, destroying teamwork, and undermining quality and productivity.

To maximize the effectiveness of PM processes today, we must, therefore, shift from the traditional mindsets:

Performance Management NOT Performance Evaluation

Too much focus on evaluation destroys the value of the whole process. When employees are only concerned with their ratings, feelings such as fear, insecurity or indifference are bound to arise. When managers do not focus on the whole process and its inputs such as goal setting, clarifying performance expectations, and coaching & feedback, it may create a skewed relationship where employees may prioritize ingratiating their managers over their actual performances. This mindset often arises from an excessive pressure to differentiate high performers from mediocre ones. While performance ratings are important, they should not create insecurity and fear. The "Rank & Yank" system, exemplified by GE under Jack Welch, highlighted the dangers of performance evaluation that leads to burnout and decreased morale. Leaders must balance performance expectations with employee well-being and sustainable practices.

Reward Distribution Mechanism

In trying to be a 'High-Performance Organization', inadvertently the focus shifts to performance evaluation which then leads to rewards. While important, rewards should not be the primary aim. This mindset can lead to a narrow focus on short-term achievements and undermine the broader objectives of PM, such as development, feedback, and long-term growth. Managers need to be trained in all steps of the process and understand that each step is equally important.

Standalone Process

Effective performance management today requires integration with the organization’s overall business strategy, ensuring that employee goals and performance are aligned with broader organizational priorities and adapting to changing business needs. PM must be integrated with business realities.

Political/Discrimination Tool

Historically, in some organizations, PM system may have been manipulated to favor certain employees or to control and discipline others unfairly. This is an unethical mindset that needs to be avoided. Modern performance management emphasizes fairness, transparency, and objectivity, ensuring that the process is free from bias.

Additional Managerial Responsibility

Traditionally, managers might have viewed PM as an administrative task to be completed periodically, rather than an ongoing, integral part of their leadership role. In contemporary organizations, effective PM is recognized as a fundamental leadership responsibility. Leaders are expected to engage in continuous coaching, provide regular feedback, and actively support their team’s development and alignment with strategic goals.

Transforming Performance Management into an Enabling Process

Replacing the above with a forward-looking mindset is critical to enhance organizational, team, and individual productivity. This requires a shift in seeing and using the PM process to:

Align Strategy with Execution

Ensure that goals are linked to strategic objectives. This alignment guarantees that employees' efforts directly contribute to the organization's overarching goals, fostering coherence and purpose in their work.

Enable Goal Achievement

Facilitate the success of individuals and teams. By providing the necessary resources, support, and development opportunities, PM process should empower employees to meet and exceed their objectives, thereby driving overall performance.

Be a Continuous Process

Regularly review and adjust goals and strategies. PM should be an ongoing process, involving frequent check-ins, feedback sessions, and adjustments to goals as needed to respond to changing business environments and individual progress.

Promote Open Communication

Foster a culture of continuous feedback and open dialogue between managers and employees. Regular communication helps identify issues early, provides opportunities for course correction, and enhances trust and engagement.

Focus on Development

Prioritize employee growth and development by identifying skill gaps and providing relevant training and development opportunities. This approach not only improves current performance but also prepares employees for future roles.

Ensure Fairness and Transparency

Implement objective and transparent criteria for performance evaluations. This ensures fairness, reduces bias, and builds trust in the performance management process. The evaluative criteria must be clarified at the time of goal setting.

Leverage Technology

Utilize modern PM software to track goals, provide real-time feedback, and analyze performance data. Technology can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the PM process.

Encourage Collaboration

Promote teamwork and collaborative goal setting. By aligning individual goals with team objectives, PM can foster a collaborative work environment where collective success is prioritized.

How can Leaders Contribute?

Dave Ulrich's work emphasizes the critical role of leadership and mindset in enhancing performance management. Ulrich advocates for:

Strategic Alignment: Leaders must ensure that PM processes are tightly aligned with the organization’s strategic goals, creating a clear connection between individual contributions and overall business success.

Holistic Development: Leaders should focus on developing the whole employee, considering their career aspirations, skills development, and overall well-being, rather than just evaluating past performance.

Cultural Fit: PM should assess and reinforce cultural alignment, ensuring that employees’ behaviors and values align with the organization’s culture and strategic direction.

Agility and Adaptability: In a rapidly changing business environment, leaders need to foster a culture of agility and continuous learning, where PM processes are flexible and adaptive to evolving business needs.

Empowerment and Engagement: Leaders should empower employees by involving them in goal setting and decision-making processes, increasing their engagement and commitment to organizational goals.

Summary

The evolution of performance management approach and practices highlight the move away from viewing it just as performance evaluation, indeed, it is to be seen as a holistic, developmental process which comprises of many steps, evaluation being one of them. The primary aim of the process is to deliver organizational success, while rewarding teams and individuals who stand out is but one outcome. Leaders and managers need to provide their input in the process to make it work as an on-going and continuous part of their role, which requires organizations to invest in their human capabilities as well as in technology that facilitates sustained performance.

What's your experience?