Managing Organisational Capabilities – Ditch the One Size fits all for the 80/20 rule.
Jeevan Joshi Pamu
Improving and optimising enterprise Capability, Learning and People architecture in complex organisations.
Capability Management In theory is a logical and sensible approach that in practice has not lived up to its promise.
Capability Management enables organisations to identify, develop, and maintain the abilities and resources an organisation needs to achieve their goals. By effectively managing capabilities, organisations can improve their competitiveness, adapt to changes in the market, and stay ahead of the curve in terms of technology and innovation.
During my many years of consulting across industries including Healthcare, Defence, Financial Services, Telecomm and NFPs, I have struggled to find a noteworthy implementation of Capability Management that contributes to business outcomes as it was intended. (I would like to think I am wrong or simply ignorant. Please let me know if you have come across one).
Before we begin it is important to clarify the two common flavours of capability management in the industry. Capability Management as used by HR and L&D professionals focuses on workforce KSA (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes). The second and more overarching flavour of Capability Management is the abilities and resources an organisation needs to achieve a goal or outcome. For example, Australian Defence defines Capability as the effects provided by a ‘system’ of interlocking and interdependent inputs such as Personnel, Organisation, Collective training, Major Systems, Supplies, Facilities and training areas, Support Command and management. A separate blog post on this coming soon. For this blog, Capability Management refers to workforce Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes.
There are many reasons the current ineffectiveness of Capability Management, but the reason that I want to focus on in this blog is that organisations do not prioritise their efforts and try to do too much Capability Management.
HR & L&D often strive for comprehensive and meticulous capability management including multiple levels of competencies and all-encompassing skills frameworks for all job families. They overlook the significant effort and resources required to properly implement and maintain effective Capability Management. The reality a high level of detail and resolution for all organisational capabilities may not be feasible given the limited resources available and the fast-changing nature of business.?
The solution is to apply the 20/80 rule to Capability Management
The 80/20 rule, also known as the Pareto principle, states that approximately 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes and is used to identify areas where the majority of outcomes can be achieved with a relatively small proportion of inputs. The 80/20 ratio is not a hard and fast rule and may vary in different situations, but the principle still serves as a useful tool for decision-making and prioritisation.
Organisations can achieve a significant improvement in results by focusing their resources and efforts on vital 20% of the capabilities that produce the majority (approximately 80%) of their outcomes. The figure below depicts a grid mapping business priority of the capability against its permanence (shelf life). The top 20% of business priorities (green band) is where the effort should be prioritised. The bottom 20% can be safely ignored in most cases unless?it has compliance implications.
High Priority + High Permanence Capabilities (Critical)
领英推荐
High Priority + Low Permanence Capabilities (Emerging)?
Low Priority + High Permanence (Maintain)
Low Priority + Low Permanence?
As you can see managing capabilities is a complex and challenging process that requires careful planning and management. While a one-size-fits-all approach may seem straightforward, it can be limiting and inefficient, as it does not allow for the prioritisation of scarce resources to the most critical capabilities. By prioritising the most critical capabilities and investing resources accordingly, you can build a resilient and innovative organisation that can thrive in a rapidly changing business landscape.
About me - Designing and implementing enterprise Capability Management is my passion. My approach I prefer is:
Subscribe to my blog here.
Digital Information, Services, Technology and Strategy Executive
2 年No dissent here Jeevan but a different take. The problem is where capability management sits in the organisation IMHO. Typically it sits in HR. However the value of HR is purely operational at the moment. A query of the value of HR in Chat GPT gave me the following: “HR, or Human Resources, is a critical department within an organization that manages the company's most valuable asset: its people. The value of HR to an organization can be summarized in the following ways: Recruitment and retention Employee development Performance management Compliance Culture and engagement Overall, the value of HR to an organization is significant. HR helps to ensure that the organization has the right people in the right roles, that employees are trained and developed, that performance is managed effectively, and that the organization is compliant with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, HR plays a critical role in creating a positive work culture and promoting employee engagement, which can have a significant impact on employee satisfaction, retention, and productivity.” No mention of capability management. Again the question I ask is why would we not devolve the responsibility? Just a thought!
Global HR Leader | Talent & Leadership| Author: The Skills Advantage | Speaker | Top 25 Thought Leader
2 年Hi Jeevan... Interesting take on capability development and prioritizing. What I would also like to explore is how do also include human-centered approach to capability building (that may not be a business priority) in the mix of the overall approach.
Good start JJ helping to clarify the landscape of organisation’s people capabilities - keep it coming!
Workplace Learning, Leadership, Capability & Practice-based Analysis Expert
2 年Some interesting insights here Jeevan, thanks for sharing. I think we're long overdue a coffee as capability uplift is something close to Dr Kuva Jacobs and I. One area we're working in closely would overlap the emergent and critical quadrants in your diagram and I would loosely categorised one of the key areas we are looking at as 'latent, horizontal capability that addresses the volatility, intensity and complexity of contemporary organisational contexts. Let's catch-up soon.
Experienced CEO and director
2 年Thank you Jeevan. Interesting insights into managing energy and resources for best outcomes within a capability framework.