Manage vs. Control Quality: Clearing the Confusion

As someone who mentors PMP aspirants preparing for the exam, I often notice a recurring theme of confusion when it comes to Manage Quality and Control Quality. It’s not surprising—these two processes share a lot of overlap, yet their purposes and focus are distinctly different. To make matters trickier, Manage Quality was once referred to as Quality Assurance in earlier editions of the PMBoK Guide, which adds historical baggage to the discussion.

What I always remind my mentees is that the key to understanding these two processes lies in one crucial distinction:

• Manage Quality is process-oriented.
• Control Quality is product-oriented.

But here’s the most important thing to know: these processes aren’t meant to stand alone. They work hand in hand, complementing each other to ensure both the process and the product meet the required quality standards. Let’s explore their roles, how they differ, and how they work together.

Management vs. Control: A Simple Framework

To truly grasp the difference between Manage Quality and Control Quality, it helps to take a step back and think about the broader concepts of "managing" versus "controlling."

• Managing is about planning and prevention. It’s proactive and focuses on creating a process that minimizes the chance of issues arising in the first place.
• Controlling is about monitoring and verification. It’s reactive and focuses on identifying and correcting issues that occur despite your best efforts.

When we apply this to quality:

• Manage Quality focuses on ensuring the processes used to create the deliverables are effective, efficient, and aligned with standards.
• Control Quality focuses on inspecting the deliverables themselves to ensure they meet the required specifications.

These two processes tackle the same goal—Quality—but from different angles. Let’s take a closer look at each one.

Manage Quality: Process-Oriented and Proactive

Manage Quality is all about ensuring the process of producing the deliverables is set up for success. It’s proactive in nature, designed to prevent defects by embedding quality into the way the work is performed. The idea is simple: if you get the process right, the chances of producing a defect-free deliverable are much higher.

Here are the key traits of Manage Quality:

• Focus: It’s process-oriented, focusing on how the work is done.
• Nature: It’s proactive, with the goal of preventing defects before they happen.
• Activities: It includes quality audits, compliance reviews, process analysis, and identifying opportunities for process improvement.

The primary goal of Manage Quality is to ensure that everyone involved in the project follows a well-designed, efficient, and effective process. By refining the way work is performed, Manage Quality reduces the likelihood of errors or defects in the deliverables.

Control Quality: Product-Oriented and Reactive

While Manage Quality focuses on the process, Control Quality shifts the spotlight to the deliverables. This process is about inspecting and verifying that the outputs meet the predefined quality requirements. Unlike Manage Quality, which is proactive, Control Quality is reactive—it catches and corrects defects that may have slipped through.

Here are the key traits of Control Quality:

• Focus: It’s product-oriented, concentrating on the deliverables.
• Nature: It’s reactive, focused on detecting defects.
• Activities: It involves inspections, testing, measurements, and statistical sampling to verify the deliverables meet the required standards.

The essence of Control Quality is to ensure that nothing defective or below standard gets delivered to the customer. If issues are identified, corrective action is taken, and the process is refined to prevent similar problems in the future.

How They Work Hand in Hand

The beauty of Manage Quality and Control Quality lies in how they complement one another. These processes aren’t separate—they’re interconnected, working together to achieve the same ultimate goal: delivering a high-quality outcome.

Here’s how they support each other:

1. Manage Quality sets the foundation for Control Quality: By creating a strong, well-designed process, Manage Quality reduces the likelihood of defects, making the job of Control Quality easier and more efficient.
2. Control Quality provides feedback to Manage Quality: When Control Quality identifies defects, that information is fed back into Manage Quality. This feedback loop allows the team to identify weaknesses in the process and refine it to prevent similar issues in the future.

Think of it like this:

• Manage Quality focuses on doing things right (the process).
• Control Quality focuses on ensuring the right things were done (the product).

Neither process can succeed in isolation. A flawless process (Manage Quality) doesn’t guarantee perfection without inspections (Control Quality), and inspections (Control Quality) alone are meaningless if the underlying process (Manage Quality) is flawed. It’s their collaboration that ensures both the process and the product are up to par.

Prevention vs. Detection: A Balanced Approach

One way to summarize the relationship between Manage Quality and Control Quality is to think of them as two sides of the same coin:

• Manage Quality emphasizes prevention: It’s proactive and aims to stop problems before they happen by designing a solid process.
• Control Quality emphasizes detection: It’s reactive and ensures that any issues that do arise are identified and addressed.

Together, they form a balanced approach to quality management. Prevention reduces the chance of defects, while detection ensures that no defect goes unnoticed.

One Sentence to Remember

If you’re trying to summarize the difference in one line, here it is:

• Manage Quality is about designing a process to prevent defects.
• Control Quality is about inspecting the product to detect defects.

And together, they work hand in hand to ensure both the process and the deliverables meet the required standards.

To be continued....

Karim EL MAMERI

#projectmanagement #riskmanagement #rmp #pmpcertification #pmpexam #pmpcertified #pmpcourse #projectmanagementprofessional #riskassessment #pmptraining#projectmanagers #projectmanagementinstitute #projectleadership