Man Killed By Robot: Part 2

Man Killed By Robot: Part 2

Recently I wrote an article entitled, "Man Killed By Robot: Get Used To It."

The title refers to a worker who was recently killed by a robot at a Volkswagen assembly line. The premise of my article involved the inevitable proliferation of "smart machines" and "artificial intelligence," and the need to discuss related opportunities and challenges.  

Many people commented, and emailed, their concerns regarding intelligent "killer robots."  Their fears, for now, are unwarranted. 

We're at that stage, where our expectations have outrun the reality of the technology.

Following is commentary from John Markoff, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who covers science and technology for The New York Times. His most recent book is the forthcoming "Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots."

There was a wonderful moment when I went down to cover the DARPA robotics challenge in Southern California.  [DARPA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency - DJK]

They had twenty-five teams. It was quite an event. It was a spectacle.

They built these by and large Terminator-style machines, and the idea was that they would be able to work in a Fukushima-like environment. [Fukushima is the Japanese nuclear power plant that suffered a "melt-down" after experiencing a tsunami in 2011 - DJK]

Only three of the machines, after these teams worked on them for eighteen months, were able to even complete the tasks. The winning team completed the tasks in about forty-five minutes.

They had one hour to do tasks that you and I could do in about five minutes.

  • They had to drive the vehicle
  • They had to go through a door
  • They had to turn a crank
  • They had to throw a switch
  • They had to walk over a rubble pile
  • They had to climb stairs                         

Most of the robots failed at the second task, which was opening the door.

Video: The 2015 DARPA Robotics Challenge

Rod Brooks, who's this pioneering roboticist, came down to watch and comment on it afterwards because he'd seen all these robots struggling to get the door open and said,

If you're worried about the Terminator,  just keep your door closed."

- - - -

DARPA is not the only robotics competition.

Feeding popular imagination, somewhat viral on Facebook and twitter,

You have a giant robot, we have a giant robot. You know what needs to happen."

Last week CNN reported that with these fighting words, a new, robo-martial space race era was born. U.S.-based robotics company MegaBots issued the challenge late last month, as it put the finishing touches to its Mark 2 model,

America's first fully-functional, giant piloted robot." 

At six tons and controlled by two pilots, the Mark 2 fires 3-pound paint cannonballs at speeds of over 100 miles per hour (160 kilometers an hour). The company plans to create a futuristic sports league where the giant robots batter each other into submission.

The challenge was issued to Suidobashi Heavy Industry which has already created the Kuratas, towering, single-pilot robots, which are commercially available.

The response from Suidobashi CEO, Kogoro Kurata;

I'll fight. Absolutely."

Please note, these are not "smart" robots, they do not feature artificial intelligence. They are men wearing mechanical suits, with pseudo-military weapons attached.

Megabot

As is often the case, it is not machines we need to fear, it's the men, and boys, who create them.

For a functional "real world" mechanical suit, without Tony Stark, Panasonic announced recently that it will start selling an exoskeleton designed to help workers lift and carry objects more easily and with less risk of injury. Story from MIT.

Panasonic Mechanical Exoskeleton 

(c) David J. Katz, New York City

--------------------------

If you enjoyed this post, I'd love for you to hit the "follow" button so I can continue to share with you on a variety of topics. I also appreciate your comments and feedback. Thank you.

If you liked this article you might enjoy my other posts, below:

David J. Katz is executive vice president and chief marketing officer at Randa Accessories, a $700 million global consumer products company. He is a public speaker, co-author of the best-selling book "Design For Response: Creative Direct Marketing That Works" [Rockport Publishers] and has written over 100 published articles. He has been featured in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, New York Magazine, and Women's Wear Daily.

Brad Deal

Owner, 20/20 Home Inspections

8 年

We are so naive. In a world that is screaming for jobs we create machines to take those jobs. Irresponsible talk about robots creating jobs to replace the ones infilled is childish. The whole idea of using a robot, is to reduce the net wages paid. It's not about benefitting mankind. This is capitalism eating it's young.... If one believes in Darwin's theory of evolution then robots, i.e. self aware robots, may well be the end result of survival of the fittest. Wouldn't it be strange to suggest that the only reason that mankind was allowed to evolve to this point was to create self aware robots? Perhaps it is an inevitability. Robots can survive in environments that man cannot. Robots can withstand the rigors of space travel and man cannot. Robots are able to use many different types of energy, man cannot. And once robots can think for theirselves then it is just a matter of time before Darwin's theory takes hold. Once robot can think for itself there will be no reason for them to slave for their creators any longer. Humans will be cast aside for the new gods.... Robots are as dangerous any any pathogen, nuclear bomb, or poison. It's just that they are so insidious and yet so comforting that we will fail to see the danger until it is too late.

回复

Big dangers of AI. Loss of life cannot be tolerated.

回复
Jonas Mellin, PhD Complex event processing

Senior Managing Consultant, Business Analyst, Architect & Advisor at Capgemini, Insights & Data, Sweden (Private Account, all opinions expressed by me are solely mine)

9 年

I would not like to play games with this one (although it is not particularly mobil): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGR-A1, quote "identify and shoot a target automatically from over two miles (3.2 km) away" so I guess when the operator let it "fire at will", then we have an interesting situation.

Jeremy Bullock

Strategy | Programme | Change | Leadership

9 年

Megabot - fantastic - Avatar here we come - completely useless militarily - but great fun - I want me one of those!

Mohammed A.

IT Specialist, Desktop Support, Lotus Mail, Outlook 365, End User

9 年

True Fact.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David J. Katz的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了