Making waves with the S-102 standard
Tommy Mikkelsen
Managing Director at Trelleborg Marine Systems DK | Business Innovation & Strategy | Mergers and Acquisitions | Board member
In the 1990s, electronic charting
However, the S-57 standard did not provide detailed guidance on the portrayal
The S-102 standard was developed in the early 2000s through collaboration between the IHO and national hydrographic offices worldwide. The goal was to create a standard that would provide detailed guidance on the content, structure, and symbology of bathymetric data in ENCs, and ensure that the portrayal of bathymetry was accurate, consistent, and easy to understand.
S-102 charts provide mariners with accurate and reliable information
The standard also provides a set of symbology rules that govern the portrayal of bathymetry, including color schemes and contour intervals. This makes it easier for the pilot to interpret the information presented in the chart. The charts can be displayed in various ways, including hill shading, heat map view, or the more traditional ENC view. Additionally, since the charts consist of a high-density grid of accurate soundings
领英推荐
One of the benefits of using the S-102 standard with a portable piloting unit (PPU) is the availability of high-density, high-resolution depth data, which can provide important navigational information to the pilot. As ships get bigger, but ports and waterways don't, the need for accurate navigational information, such as the gap between the ship and the seabed increases. With a PPU, the absolute vertical location of the ship, along with its roll and pitch angles, can be determined, allowing for a highly accurate calculation of the shortest distances
Furthermore, the S-102 standard enables the creation of safety contours, which are lines on a chart that indicate the minimum depth required for safe navigation. Safety contours are generated based on the depth and accuracy of the soundings in the chart. Higher-density contours indicate a greater degree of accuracy, while lower-density contours indicate a lesser degree of accuracy. Safety contours can be used to ensure that vessels remain in safe waters while navigating, especially in areas where there may be underwater hazards such as rocks, reefs, or other obstructions.
In conclusion, the S-102 standard is an important development in electronic charting that provides mariners with accurate and reliable information about water depths, enabling safe navigation. The standard's guidelines for accuracy, precision, and symbology ensure that bathymetry is portrayed consistently and accurately on charts. Combined with a portable piloting unit, the S-102 standard can provide even more valuable information to the pilot, including the shortest distances between the ship's hull and the seabed. Safety contours generated using the S-102 standard can help ensure that vessels remain in safe waters while navigating, especially in areas with underwater hazards.
To explore Trelleborg’s advanced, highly accurate piloting and navigation solutions for offshore and pilotage applications, visit?https://bit.ly/3mrrZx0
If you're looking to stay up to date on the latest news, then?SafePilot Newsletter?is the perfect resource for you. Subscribe today to receive the most relevant and informative content straight to your inbox.?Click?here?and be sure to tick?Navigation & Piloting!
Navy officer - hydrographer
1 年Federation of authoritative marine spatial data infrastructures is in my opinion one of the key challenges. Enabling the delivering of local to global S1xx services. Authoritative means responsability and accountability, and policy (and legal) and governance (and institutions) are the key strategic pathways.
Marine cartography and navigation
1 年In addition to my above comments see how it works with regular S-57 data.
Marine cartography and navigation
1 年NoGo areas depicted can be built on base of S-57 data with the same result and quality for the practical navigation. The benefit of using S-57 is obvious - lest technical expenses of using well know, widely used and relatively simple vs S-102 complexity. The dificulty of S-100 model is unreasonable and implies just higher cost for implementation both in HOs and ECDIS manufacturers. At the same time the risk of data misinterpretation of sophisticated data structure goes high implying higher risk for navigation.
Bridging Needs and Technology in Geospatial Solutions
1 年Great explanation on the benefits of S-102. Add to that, that S-102 data in many cases can be produced, automatically, from existing data and easily updated with new survey data. Constantly ensuring mariners have the latest information available. This thanks to advanced analysis, automation and (cloud) infrastructure, from source to mariner.
Managing Director, Nederlands Loodswezen B.V. | The Nautical Institute Netherlands Branch | Scheepvaartkring Rotterdam | Loodsensoci?teit Rotterdam | Rotterdam Maritime Services Community | AFNI AFRIN
1 年Good article Tommy, I just wonder if this kind of display is what pilots are waiting for. The beauty of PPU over ECDIS is that it will bring onboard an information system ( with extra antennae : a navigation system ) which is tailor made to the needs of the pilot. Compared to ECDIS the PPU has no information-overload because of all the display and alarm requirements, typical for an ECDIS display. When I enter port with a (deep draft) ship I prefer the “binary” display: where can I go, where can’t I go. As long as the PPU system has the right and updated amount of depth soundings, enables live tidal heights, and the rcorrect draft and UKC settings that’s all I need to know for executing the voyage safely. A black and white ( in this case blue and white ) presentation. And of course, cross-referencing the position to the ships navigation equipment and by looking out of the window remains a very important thing as well. Stay safe!