Making Teamwork Work
Thank you Avery Zenger for your help with this article!

Making Teamwork Work

The Problem: Work Isn't Working!

No alt text provided for this image

Our modern work environment is not the same as it was when we started creating large organizations over a century ago. Work has evolved from simple roles that individual contributors completed on a routine basis where we could easily measure and reward the output of every employee. The relationships and technology needed to manage the old ‘command-and-control’ hierarchical organization structure was much easier compared to today.

Work has changed significantly over the past century to a point where we can no longer get work done using independent individuals completing a sequence of unique tasks. We have rapidly moved to a dynamic team structure where interdependent individuals must work together in teams to create complex products and solutions for their customers.

The problem is that we tell our employees to work together in teams, but all of our processes and technology were designed to support individual contribution.

Here are some simple examples:

  • We tell employees to “work in teams” but still stack rank their individual contribution as if they compete with each other.
  • We tell employees to “work in teams” but still deliver the majority of recognition and spot bonuses based on individual contribution.
  • We tell employees to “work in teams” but still provide feedback and training focused on individual contribution.
  • We tell employees to use new team collaboration tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Box to help them work better together, but then fail to use these tools to measure, recognize, and reward outstanding team contribution.

This struggle is creating a major epidemic inside of our organizations that will only get worse as we put more conflicting responsibilities on our employees. We think it is time for every organization to start asking this one simple question: “Are we building our work culture around employee competition or employee connection?”. You can’t have both. The lack of alignment is creating major problems for every individual at every level.

The Symptoms: We Are ‘Hurting’ Our Employees

No alt text provided for this image

We are all aware of the many symptoms that result from the misalignment of an organization that is structured around teams and our technology that is structured around individuals. Employees’ needs are not being met and it is affecting employee health and wellbeing. Study after study shows that rising levels of stress in the workplace is a major contributor to chronic health problems and unhealthy behaviors.

It is a bit shocking to hear academic research blame the workplace environment as the fifth largest cause of death in the United States.

But if we really stop and think about it, the warning signs are all there:

  • Employees don’t feel psychological safety where they can take risks and be vulnerable in front of each other.
  • Nearly two-thirds of employees are unfulfilled at work and feel like their job controls them, rather than them controlling their jobs.
  •  People don’t trust each other because they don’t have the time or opportunity to create meaningful relationships with the people they work with.

The Easy Solution: Automate the Technology

No alt text provided for this image

The HR Technology market is experiencing a great deal of investment and growth as organizations and vendors struggle to figure out how to improve the employee experience and create a more engaged workforce. Leaders are scrambling to figure out how to fix many of the broken technology and processes that have become more visible as they move away from command-and-control structures and create dynamic teams that require much stronger relationships. The simple solution (and current theory among most HR Tech companies) is to take the existing technology and apply automation and user-centered design to make things easier to use in the flow of work. However, there comes a point where we all must step back and ask ourselves: “Are these new technologies making things better or worse for our employees?”.

While automation may make the process simpler, it doesn’t solve the core problem. We continue to try and fix our employee engagement problem by adding additional tools and technology which only end up adding more stress felt by every employee. 

The average large organization now has 15 or more tools within their HR Tech stack.

Examples include: a tool for performance reviews, a tool for goal setting, a tool for goal tracking, a tool for feedback, a tool for recognition, a tool for pulse surveys, and multiple tools for training and employee development. With all of these productivity tools and applications integrated into every employee's daily work, it’s a wonder how they find time to get any meaningful, creative work done at all. We think there has come a point that we all must stop and reflect on the purpose and value delivered by each of these disconnected tools to determine if they are actually driving the desired outcomes for the business. What message are we really sending when we force every employee to complete just one more survey about the culture of the organization.

The Real Cause: Inconsistency Between Messages and Actions

No alt text provided for this image

Organizations may vocally state that they care about the health and wellbeing of their employees, but their actions say something very different. Truly caring about the wellbeing of your employees does not look like the following:

  • Stack ranking all employees within a group or forcing their performance to fit inside of one of nine boxes
  • Monitoring their email activity to predict who might be a flight risk
  • Begging employees to stay when they tell you they have found a better job
  • Delivering feedback that sounds more like ‘you are never going to be good enough’
  • Requiring all employees to create goals that cascade up to management objectives
  • Creating People Analytics teams to find hidden insights in the vast amount of confidential employee data

We believe there’s a better way.

We believe that every employee has the right to work productively on teams with individuals who support the unique strengths of each member. 

We think it is clear that the technology currently used to manage employees is not designed to create this type of relationship and it is only a matter of time before employees will become fed up with the controlling aspect of an anxious employer that is terrified of an employee who will actually leave. HR and business leaders must stop focusing on what our employees are doing for the organization and instead focus on what they are doing to support effective teams. We challenge all organizations and vendors to stop building HR technology that just automates outdated HR processes designed for individuals and start building technology designed to optimize team success.

The Pivot: Employee Ownership

No alt text provided for this image

For the past 100 years technology and innovation has disrupted nearly every aspect of how, where, when, and why we work. You would think that how we measure, monitor, and drive employee performance would change as well but that's not the case. Organizations still largely use the same processes, rubrics, and metrics that were leveraged several decades ago. There is a better way.

We believe it is time for a major disruption in this space, not just incremental optimization. 

We believe it's time for managers to stop using HR Tech to control employees’ activities but instead for employees to start using HR Tech to control their own development.

This pivotal disruption cannot happen without fundamentally changing the control of all employee performance data related to an individual. 

If we really care about the wellbeing of our employees, we must set their performance data free so they can control and influence their career identity and performance reputation. Look at what this type of freedom of data has done for personal finance and fitness. Tools like Mint, Fitbit, Apple Health have put financial and health performance data into the hands of the individuals with remarkable outcomes. We believe that that type of freedom and joint ownership of work performance data can be equally as impactful for individuals and organizations. Here is a list of just some of the elements that we think every employee should control:

  • Every individual should control who they want to receive feedback from
  • Every individual should control who they share their performance data with
  • Every individual should be able to see the strengths and weakness of their team and understand how they uniquely contribute to team success
  • Every individual should control how much performance data they share with others
  • Every individual should control the skills they want to develop to be a more effective team member and chart their own course
  • Every individual should be able to ask for and receive peer coaching from anyone else
  • And most importantly, every individual should be able to control and keep their performance reputation throughout their entire career, even if they move to a new organization

The Prevention: Build Trusting Connections Between People

No alt text provided for this image

If organizations are now structured as dynamic teams that require strong relationships between individuals, then our HR Technology needs to also focus on building trusting connections between people. Aligning the team structure and technology together will dramatically change the focus of many of the HR functions inside of organizations. This will impact the wellbeing of your employees in a positive way as they create a network of trusting relationships that improve team dynamics, creates cohesion between team members, and helps teams get things done faster.

We challenge all organizations and vendors to design and adopt HR Technology focused on serving the needs of all stakeholders including individuals, employees, teams, leaders, and the organization.

Creating unique value for all stakeholders is the best way to build trusting relationships between everyone involved.

21st-century HR Tech must help individuals to identify and expand their strengths, help employees thrive in a supportive environment, help teams effectively use the strengths of each team member, help leaders request and give constructive coaching, and help organizations use People Analytics to optimize team success. We look forward to the day when HR Technology creates unique value for every single stakeholder allowing individuals to control their validated career identity and generate powerful data designed to optimize team success.

Mitch Zenger love the post !! I appreciate the focus on the development of people because that is where we will make the most tangible strides.

回复
Nov Omana, HRIP

HR Technology & Strategy (HRIS), Business Analysis, Innovative Human Resources programs, Digital Transformation/Adoption, Podcaster (TechNOVLogic), Host of the Technology Review Council, Speaker/Technology Leader

3 年

Mitch, you have given a voice to the nagging problem of TOO MUCH ORGANIZATION and not enough INDEPENDENCE. Individuals aggregate naturally, yet organizations seem to want to stop and tell us who to work with. We find more connection as we choose a team of people to work with, innovation comes from the diversity of opinion, and finding common goals within a group allows for faster progress. Your article is foundational in how it points out not only the problem but also the potential solution. Thank you!!!

回复
Lawrence Henderson

Empowering Leadership Excellence | PhD Scholar Practitioner | ICF Credentialed Coach | Founder - BOSS LLC | Innovating Leadership Development for Transformative Growth

4 年

Great article Mitch Zenger ! "We believe that every employee has the right to work productively on teams with individuals who support the unique strengths of each member." This is empathy and grace in action #thenewhardskills

回复
Chris Ortolano ??

Delivering Encore Experiences at Stages Norhtwest

4 年

Organizations are oriented around silos and hierchies, yet that decreases effectiveness. Many of the team building strategies, including OKRs, discount the political ramifications of change. Without consensus from the top, there will be no teamwork at the bottom.

回复
Sandi (Sandra) Knight, SPHR, MPM, ACC

President, Knight HR Consulting and Coaching | Strategic Planning | Process Improvement | Cultural Transformation | Inspiring and impacting leaders to be extraordinary

4 年

Mitch - great topic.? It is going to be a major mindset change to convert organizations into thinking about the team vs the individual.? I do agree, however, think this is where we need to go.? Not only for the betterment of employee engagement, but this allows employees to start actually having relationships again in the workforce instead of heads down in a cubicle, with their earbuds in, not talking to anyone.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了