Making Pricing Work for You
Picture Credit: https://licensebridge.com/how-to-price-your-wordpress-plugin-or-theme-and-maximize-sales/

Making Pricing Work for You

<Updated with inputs from my wonderful Google colleagues: @Dirk Nachbar, @Ulrich Keller, @Evan Otero & @Nick Krasney>

I have been talking to different startups about pricing/monetization strategy and it looks like it is a common challenge; hence consolidating my thoughts here.

When to start thinking?

As early as possible

What should a good pricing strategy take into account?

  • Realistic, feasible Total Addressable Market (TAM)?that is right-sized to product offerings (not everyone has a 0.01% chance of using the products)?
  • A clear, objective, data-driven* plan for revenue (calibrated demand based on proposed pricing)
  • Benefits of this product proposition over alternatives for the right audience - right product-market fit at the right price
  • Lifetime Value (LTV) vs. short-term conversions (how to optimize to attract high-LTV users?)
  • Understand key stakeholders' needs & decision-making process to address concerns (e.g. end users of products might not be the budget approvers)?

*data-driven is not equal to set-in-stone, it means updating with the most updated & accurate numbers

?Who to involve??
Cross-functional effort, not just Finance

  • Definition of strategy likely require multiple iterations and cross team calibrations (not one-way street)
  • Cross-function inputs (e.g. Sales, User Feedback) are especially important if product is ‘disrupting’ existing market because this is not just a financial decision, but also impacts business model (e.g. software SaaS vs high-touch consulting) & overall strategy: OKR (users, revenue, # bookings, ARPU...), GTM, target clients & TAM, product features prioritization, hiring...

How granular or accurate should this be??
Depends on the stage where strategy is applied

  • Early - realistic TAM & plans to address their needs; accuracy of forecast not as important; be open & flexible to adapt based on feedback/tests
  • Late - traction-adjusted forecast

Now we are talking: How can we do this?

  • What is the right pricing unit (per API call/ user/ data usage or fixed monthly fee)?

1.??Check how cost, profit, margins scale with client's size

2.??Define the most granular building block & set price at this level

3.??If very different from existing models, need to demonstrate clear product value to users/clients

  • ?How to price? (suggest to do the following sequentially, but can be done in parallel if the team has a good understanding of value-add & MVP is ready)

1.?Value-add to users: quantify improvement (e.g. A/B tests, pilot clients...) & ensure price <= noticeable/perceived value. Types of value-add:

A.?Efficiency: do existing products work faster/with less resources

-?Breakdown value chain/user journey into respective components

-?Map out pain points/barriers + resources needed to do the job?

-?Quantify value of each step/block

-?Identify perceived risks for switching to new processes & quantify costs

? B.?Effectiveness: improve on existing job through better output (e.g. new dashboards, BI tools)

-?Expand potential use cases, e.g. making decision vs monitoring performance; substituting vs. supplementing existing sources

-?Expand scope of pilots after initial use cases have been validated

? C.?Do New Job - new approach required, which is not feasible with existing ways of working

-?The most value-add, but no one-size-fits-all approach, needs clients to work closely to quantify value

-?Requires good understanding of key stakeholders involved & how existing solutions fit into overall business process to expand scope (e. g. algorithm developed for one function can be adapted for non-adjacent functions who traditionally do not have the right talents)

? 2.?Price-demand curve/price sensitivity: Optimal point for right business objectives (margins, profit, revenue, users...). Requires at least a MVP.

A.?B2C: Run different campaigns with different propositions on platforms such as Product Hunt, Kickstarter... to collect data; If live campaign is not feasible yet, consider running surveys (Common techniques include Gabor-Granger, van Westendorp and Conjoint Analysis)

B.?B2B: Different pilot clients across sizes; leverage contract renewal & negotiation to understand price sensitivity; notice willingness to pay before & after the project & understand what changed along the way to refine value equation & price-demand curve

C.?Platform: Quantify value to both parties on the marketplace to understand who gains the most from using the platform

-?define price sensitivity for both sides of platform & identify optimal point(s) to maximize OKR (users, revenue, profit...)

-?user acquisition & pricing to prioritize the party who gain less so that the other party will join automatically

-?price users according to the value gained; might be asymmetrical between the 2 parties

-?users can be both buyers & sellers in different transactions, hence the value equation has to be very clear & transparent

-?Evaluate impact of pricing on Frequency & Stickiness of platform usage

?3.??Competition: Right positioning vis-a-vis existing models

A.?<For all> Identify opportunities to provide standardized way for comparing price differences (usually opaque, as different companies offer different features at different prices)

B. <If creating a nascent category> important to define noticeable & material impact, industry norms, standards & pricing models

C.?<If attempting to disrupt incumbents> clearly communicate how the new pricing model supports the new value provided; less emphasis on comparison vs. incumbents; more on value-add

?4.?Best practices tying them all together:

A.?Identify decision-makers & decision-making process/framework + key concerns/information needed to make decisions

B.?Illustrate how startups can value-add end-to-end through key competencies/enablers

C. Standardize pricing process & aggregate by the most granular pricing block

D.?<For B2C> standardize into 3-4 price tiers for the most common use cases

E. <For B2B> System to automatically generate pricing based on # of pricing blocks required for each client

F.?<For B2B> BD/Sales team can layer upon bundle discount - as cost-to-serve does not change much by # building blocks, margins can be deprioritized for more strategic reasons (e.g. permission to build testimonial use cases, willing to be pilot partner for A/B tests...), but need to define clear principles of discounting & capture into JBP/contract

G. <For Platform/B2C> User habits are difficult to change, hence do not assume that pricing can induce users to behave differently in a sustained manner (i.e. any short-term platform usage changes in frequency/stickiness due to pricing are not likely to persist).

For example, if an average buyer buys 1 product monthly, even if transaction fees go to 0, the frequency might increase to at most 4 (but they are actually front-loading their purchase, so their purchase in subsequent months when prices go back to normal will be 0) Failure to account for this will result in a wonky price-demand curve.

H.?Most likely requires multiple iterations before an acceptable range is identified (important to align internally on OKRs & key considerations to narrow down # of potential variations to test

However the above is not a one-size fits all approach

In practice (from my experience in working with start-ups) some may require different pricing models/units (non-exhaustive examples below). The decision lies in the trade-off between willingness-to-pay, value-add, cost-to-serve & business OKRs

  • SMEs vs. Large corporations

1.?SMEs - Value-based, as they're more price sensitive, hence need to clearly quantify incremental value provided vis-a-vis existing solutions/alternatives

2. Corporations - Cost-based, as their key requirement is likely standardized, scalable insights & reports across all business needs,?

  • B2C vs. B2B

1.?B2C - API calls, as solutions are standardized?

2.?B2B - SaaS/Consultant model, through white-labeling or integrating your product into clients' consumer-facing offerings

  • Tiered pricing by transaction volume or stage of growth

1.?High volume/gradually-growing companies - fixed monthly fees & predictability of spending

2.?Low volume/high-growth - per usage & pay for performance

Additional Resources (good starting points to other resources):

Please feel free to reach out if you would like to chat more about this.

?

Amelia Zins

Industry Manager @ Google | Growth @ Google for Startups | Health & AI with expertise in Product Marketing | Longevity Enthusiast

3 年

Very insightful! Big topic with a lot of startups I work with. I agree is definitely around value = price propensity) * LTV -price, retention etc

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Yen Siang Leong的更多文章

  • Secure! or Recluse...?

    Secure! or Recluse...?

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are my own and do not reflect the views of Google. Wading into a very…

  • Green Vehicles sailing through Red Sea towards the Blue Ocean

    Green Vehicles sailing through Red Sea towards the Blue Ocean

    Following up from my previous post, this article explores the 2 key myths around Chinese private companies. Are Chinese…

  • Will the inevitable breakthrough?

    Will the inevitable breakthrough?

    Following up from my previous post, this article explores the 2 key Demand-side drivers of China's trade with global…

    1 条评论
  • Dragons at the Gate!

    Dragons at the Gate!

    sDragons conjure up images that are vastly different between Chinese and Western cultures. Ironically.

    2 条评论
  • Is this the Human-AI Symbiosis?

    Is this the Human-AI Symbiosis?

    Could the broad adoption of AI in our workplace (where humans work alongside AI) slow down because it's so successful…

  • Bounce and Bound, Out of the Pot!

    Bounce and Bound, Out of the Pot!

    Following up from my previous post on what can we expect of the coming wave of AI, this article discusses what we can…

    1 条评论
  • Boiling us gently with AI

    Boiling us gently with AI

    A few friends have asked me about an appropriate (Gen)AI strategy for their companies. The discussion always circles…

    2 条评论
  • Can SEA grow into the next Blue Tea Ocean?

    Can SEA grow into the next Blue Tea Ocean?

    Do you want to just sip tea and grow 4x in size? I spoke with a few folks from the Chinese tea brands (think the…

  • Luckin it Out: 20x Return in 3 years!

    Luckin it Out: 20x Return in 3 years!

    Why invest in start-ups when you can 2x your money in 8 months in a listed company? Luckin Coffee - Once the poster…

  • Services-Enjoyment-eNhancing AI = SenAI for Shopping?

    Services-Enjoyment-eNhancing AI = SenAI for Shopping?

    Following up on the previous post on the consumer friction when shopping for Goods, we will explore the consumer…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了