Making Pricing Work for You
Yen Siang Leong
Marketing Strategy & Analytics Lead, Devices & Services and GPay at Google
<Updated with inputs from my wonderful Google colleagues: @Dirk Nachbar, @Ulrich Keller, @Evan Otero & @Nick Krasney>
I have been talking to different startups about pricing/monetization strategy and it looks like it is a common challenge; hence consolidating my thoughts here.
When to start thinking?
As early as possible
What should a good pricing strategy take into account?
*data-driven is not equal to set-in-stone, it means updating with the most updated & accurate numbers
?Who to involve??
Cross-functional effort, not just Finance
How granular or accurate should this be??
Depends on the stage where strategy is applied
Now we are talking: How can we do this?
1.??Check how cost, profit, margins scale with client's size
2.??Define the most granular building block & set price at this level
3.??If very different from existing models, need to demonstrate clear product value to users/clients
1.?Value-add to users: quantify improvement (e.g. A/B tests, pilot clients...) & ensure price <= noticeable/perceived value. Types of value-add:
A.?Efficiency: do existing products work faster/with less resources
-?Breakdown value chain/user journey into respective components
-?Map out pain points/barriers + resources needed to do the job?
-?Quantify value of each step/block
-?Identify perceived risks for switching to new processes & quantify costs
? B.?Effectiveness: improve on existing job through better output (e.g. new dashboards, BI tools)
-?Expand potential use cases, e.g. making decision vs monitoring performance; substituting vs. supplementing existing sources
-?Expand scope of pilots after initial use cases have been validated
? C.?Do New Job - new approach required, which is not feasible with existing ways of working
-?The most value-add, but no one-size-fits-all approach, needs clients to work closely to quantify value
-?Requires good understanding of key stakeholders involved & how existing solutions fit into overall business process to expand scope (e. g. algorithm developed for one function can be adapted for non-adjacent functions who traditionally do not have the right talents)
? 2.?Price-demand curve/price sensitivity: Optimal point for right business objectives (margins, profit, revenue, users...). Requires at least a MVP.
A.?B2C: Run different campaigns with different propositions on platforms such as Product Hunt, Kickstarter... to collect data; If live campaign is not feasible yet, consider running surveys (Common techniques include Gabor-Granger, van Westendorp and Conjoint Analysis)
B.?B2B: Different pilot clients across sizes; leverage contract renewal & negotiation to understand price sensitivity; notice willingness to pay before & after the project & understand what changed along the way to refine value equation & price-demand curve
C.?Platform: Quantify value to both parties on the marketplace to understand who gains the most from using the platform
领英推荐
-?define price sensitivity for both sides of platform & identify optimal point(s) to maximize OKR (users, revenue, profit...)
-?user acquisition & pricing to prioritize the party who gain less so that the other party will join automatically
-?price users according to the value gained; might be asymmetrical between the 2 parties
-?users can be both buyers & sellers in different transactions, hence the value equation has to be very clear & transparent
-?Evaluate impact of pricing on Frequency & Stickiness of platform usage
?3.??Competition: Right positioning vis-a-vis existing models
A.?<For all> Identify opportunities to provide standardized way for comparing price differences (usually opaque, as different companies offer different features at different prices)
B. <If creating a nascent category> important to define noticeable & material impact, industry norms, standards & pricing models
C.?<If attempting to disrupt incumbents> clearly communicate how the new pricing model supports the new value provided; less emphasis on comparison vs. incumbents; more on value-add
?4.?Best practices tying them all together:
A.?Identify decision-makers & decision-making process/framework + key concerns/information needed to make decisions
B.?Illustrate how startups can value-add end-to-end through key competencies/enablers
C. Standardize pricing process & aggregate by the most granular pricing block
D.?<For B2C> standardize into 3-4 price tiers for the most common use cases
E. <For B2B> System to automatically generate pricing based on # of pricing blocks required for each client
F.?<For B2B> BD/Sales team can layer upon bundle discount - as cost-to-serve does not change much by # building blocks, margins can be deprioritized for more strategic reasons (e.g. permission to build testimonial use cases, willing to be pilot partner for A/B tests...), but need to define clear principles of discounting & capture into JBP/contract
G. <For Platform/B2C> User habits are difficult to change, hence do not assume that pricing can induce users to behave differently in a sustained manner (i.e. any short-term platform usage changes in frequency/stickiness due to pricing are not likely to persist).
For example, if an average buyer buys 1 product monthly, even if transaction fees go to 0, the frequency might increase to at most 4 (but they are actually front-loading their purchase, so their purchase in subsequent months when prices go back to normal will be 0) Failure to account for this will result in a wonky price-demand curve.
H.?Most likely requires multiple iterations before an acceptable range is identified (important to align internally on OKRs & key considerations to narrow down # of potential variations to test
However the above is not a one-size fits all approach
In practice (from my experience in working with start-ups) some may require different pricing models/units (non-exhaustive examples below). The decision lies in the trade-off between willingness-to-pay, value-add, cost-to-serve & business OKRs
1.?SMEs - Value-based, as they're more price sensitive, hence need to clearly quantify incremental value provided vis-a-vis existing solutions/alternatives
2. Corporations - Cost-based, as their key requirement is likely standardized, scalable insights & reports across all business needs,?
1.?B2C - API calls, as solutions are standardized?
2.?B2B - SaaS/Consultant model, through white-labeling or integrating your product into clients' consumer-facing offerings
1.?High volume/gradually-growing companies - fixed monthly fees & predictability of spending
2.?Low volume/high-growth - per usage & pay for performance
Additional Resources (good starting points to other resources):
Please feel free to reach out if you would like to chat more about this.
?
Industry Manager @ Google | Growth @ Google for Startups | Health & AI with expertise in Product Marketing | Longevity Enthusiast
3 年Very insightful! Big topic with a lot of startups I work with. I agree is definitely around value = price propensity) * LTV -price, retention etc