On making decisions as a quaranteam

On making decisions as a quaranteam

Today marks a month since we’ve returned to Brooklyn, and here’s how we’ve made it work: we formed a quaranteam with a family down the street, who we knew well, and a family in a neighboring apartment, who we didn’t really know at all. Between the three families, there are four toddlers.

The boys spend the day at our neighbors’ apartment, which is the one space with a coveted backyard. This DIY daycare set-up now has a swing set, a kiddy pool, and a bubble machine. Meanwhile, our home has become a WeWork—minus the self-empowerment posters. At 8 am, our neighbors let themselves in and head to the basement. My wife works from the dining room table. The master bedroom is the quietest workspace, and the race to reserve it can be more competitive than booking a LinkedIn conference room. A few times a day, we all stumble out to the coffee maker, which has become the de-facto place to chat.

On Fridays, we cookout in the neighbors’ backyard. It’s a good time. For a couple of hours, as we socialize unmasked with adults, it could be any summer.

But the quaranteam is only as strong as the rules we’ve all agreed to, and every breach of the bubble is a group decision. This was easier a month ago at the tail end of Phase One, when playgrounds and restaurants were closed, and strangers still crossed the street rather than pass each other on a sidewalk. Our neighborhood has moved, week by week, through Phase Two and into Phase Three. Now in Brooklyn, restaurants set tables for outdoor dining. Friends get together at the park. Haircuts and manicures are possible. The zoo opens back up next week, as do many daycare centers. There is traffic again.

With every week that passes, my amnesia about the immediate past deepens. I can’t even conjure the experience of total shutdown. It’s like remembering the feel of snow on a humid summer day: impossible. And yet, although the city has opened, it’s not clear to any of us exactly how we should open our bubble to meet it.

Absent absolute guidelines, we are left to muddle through these decisions in group text message threads: Nope, we don’t feel comfortable with public transportation yet. Yes, take the kids to see their grandparents. No, a playdate with another child in the park isn’t ok. Well, maybe it is—like, once a week. Or actually three times a week is fine if it’s just that one friend. Playgrounds are open, but we can’t keep our toddlers from drooling on other kids, so let’s continue to avoid. Restaurants? Outside is fine, but don’t go indoors. The subway for an occasional doctor’s appointment is fine, but Uber is better. Actually, maybe it’s worse? I don’t know, try not to take the subway. But if you do, we won’t expel you. 

The goal, we all agree, is to mitigate the risk of contracting and passing COVID-19. But how do we decide what constitutes an appropriate level of risk? In the absence of authoritative, universally accepted guidance, we cobble together information from the New York Times, social media, doctor friends, that amazing data scientist friend who has been working on the coronavirus response in Sacramento. We check in with the CDC, and our local government officials. We try to make all the info line up. And when it doesn’t exactly, we feel it out. We turn to our guts.

I’m a huge proponent of intuition. But this matter of keeping our families safe and healthy is not a matter for my gut. At least, not when my gut is being swayed by multiples sources of competing information, from New York Times reporter Donald McNeil, who said on the Daily that he wouldn’t hold his new granddaughter until he was vaccinated or immune (“I’m taking the long view. This increases the chances that both my granddaughter and I will make it to her high school graduation.”) to the U.S. President, who wore a mask publicly for the first time this week.

Besides, my gut is heavily guided by my feelings—namely, a feeling that I am entitled to participate in the world because I’ve held back for so long. (This is the reasoning that dieters use to justify the chocolate cake after a “good week.” I can tell you from experience, it doesn’t serve anyone.)

Meanwhile, even as Saturday marked the first day without a coronavirus death in our city since March, the story grows bleaker in most other places. In many states, the numbers of people with COVID-19 are rising. Public health officials and government officials seem to be working against each other in their efforts to assess and curtail the problem.

It still seems too early to judge the impact of reopening in New York. So the quaranteam shuttles back and forth between apartments as we continue our group texts and chats: No, don’t take Metro-North. Sure, the subway to the Rockaways is ok during off-hours. The park seems too crowded today… but on the other hand, there’s a breeze. You think it’s safe?

Darin Swayne

America's #1 Small Law Firm Marketing Agency and Technology Company

4 年

@

回复
Pal Ijari

Technical Solutions Specialist @ Cisco Meraki | Pre-Sales Consulting

4 年
Pal Ijari

Technical Solutions Specialist @ Cisco Meraki | Pre-Sales Consulting

4 年
回复
Lara Lightbody

General Counsel | Director of Legal I Speaker

4 年

Yep, LOTS I can relate to here Jessi Hempel, beautifully captured and one you will read back one day and it will feel quite dreamlike. Isnt it extraordinary that feeling of lockdown amnesia? it is like there is a collective forgetting the minute the opening up begins. Apparently the anxiety of how hard it is during the opening (versus the closing) is well documented and I dont think what any of us expected...

回复
Natalie MacDonald

Senior News Editor, Special Projects Lead - APAC @ LinkedIn | Currently on parental leave

4 年

Great read Jessi!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jessi Hempel的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了