Making Data a Board Agenda Issue

Making Data a Board Agenda Issue

As published in the January/February 2017 issue of NACD Directorship magazine.

In a recent poll of Fortune 500 CEOs, the rapid pace of technological change was voted the single biggest challenge facing companies, with 67 percent of respondents saying they consider their company to be a technology company. This response is striking given that less than 10 percent of Fortune 500 companies are designated as being in the technology sector.

Yet, there’s an even more fundamental differentiator that will play a critical role in how companies effectively compete in the decade to come: getting the right data, extracting insights from that data, and identifying the platforms on which data can be used strategically. In short, every company should consider itself a data company with a differentiated platform.

The audit committee is uniquely positioned to help navigate these changes through the company’s finance function, which is privy to data spanning sales metrics, revenue, margin, marketing performance, valuation, manufacturing, and supply chain vendors. Directors can help their chief financial officer and finance team take a leading role in the data revolution by asking about the tools and technologies they’re using that are tied to the company’s strategy. How is the enterprise being digitized? What trends should be monitored using data analytics? Have data sets been identified that will provide insights to driving shareholder value?

Equally important is understanding whether the finance function has the data science skills needed today. In a recent survey of finance and internal audit leaders, we found that while 86 percent of respondents use analytics, only about one-third of them are using them at an intermediate or advanced level. Two-thirds are still using basic, ad hoc analytics (like spreadsheets) or no analytics at all.

Board members should also consider thinking about data-centered systems as much as they think about tangible assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Consider that in 1985, 68 percent of the value of an S&P 500 company sat on its balance sheet in the form of tangible assets. In 1995, that figure was only 32 percent, and in 2015, it was down to just 16 percent. Today, more than 80 percent of a company’s value is now driven by intangibles. This shift may call for the board to focus on nontraditional sources of value and what the company is doing to maximize the value of its intangible technology and data. In a world where every company is a technology company, data may be your most valuable raw material.

Boards also need to understand how their companies are competing in a digital world and determine whether digitization creates strategic advantages, risks, or both. Data collection and analytics have come a long way. Today, companies can forecast impacts on supply chains and product distribution, embed analytics into the claim adjudication process used by insurers, forecast manufacturing irregularities in the auto sector to stop recalls before they happen, and build sensors into heavy equipment to create an information ecosystem that can target maintenance issues. All of these applications of collected data intersect with finance. Other game-changing innovations are materializing around augmented intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things. With these advances, the opportunities to drive strategy and performance through developing data platforms will only grow. Directors have a leading role to play in helping executives look to future risks and opportunities. Asking the right questions means understanding that some of the greatest risks may not be on the balance sheet, but some of the greatest sources of value may not be on the balance sheet either.

After all, it’s not just about surviving in a data-driven age—it’s about thriving in one. 

John Harris

Real Time Auditor and Risk Consultant

7 年

There is also so much valuable hidden data, lost data and unrealised data as well. Eg behavioural metrics on log on attempts, privacy logging of who, where,when any private data is looked at. Also bad data can be misleading. GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) avoidance should be a mindset in everyone who impacts inputs.

回复
Mike Hicks

Retired teamster at Boeing

7 年

My name is Mike. I went to school with an Al Engelbert at St Martins High School Lacey, Washington back in the 50's.

回复
Greg Basham

Leadership, Executive Coach, Team Facilitator, Strategic Advisory

8 年

Interesting perspective from a CEO suggesting a greater role for the board in making data a board issue. Boards set policy and approve what the CEO puts in front of them. A board - or board members -who want to set the agenda for the CEO gets it backwards. As a former executive of a large P&C insurer with Internal Audit administratively part of my portfolio, I can't see the audit committee of the Board playing a significant role in this area as that is not their function. They're looking at the company through a rear view mirror more than ahead - other than approving the audit plan. It's the CEOs role to put a strategic agenda and priorities and metrics in front of the board and to report on the critical issues and metrics.

Dean Carson CPA

Principal Analyst @ GRLSTEM | CPA,Growth Strategy, Logistics and Risk Management, Cyber Risk, GRC and ITGRC, ALL Sector Analyst, Economics, Risk, Financials, Legal, Technology and Social Research #CFO #CIO #PM #BA #STEM

8 年

My lines work with Domestic and Global Knowledge and application of direct relevance to Our Sector needs on Services an Pathways to position in rapidly changing times here the Economic Constants of Supply and Demand will always be a strength to help on needs including your teamwork initiatives to promote inclusive teamwork. I am seeking to map in on #innovate #analyze #Refine and #Repeat Cycles for consistent development rooted to the practical points of delivery on value. Thanks for your time in considering this note. With hopes e may speak.

回复
Dean Carson CPA

Principal Analyst @ GRLSTEM | CPA,Growth Strategy, Logistics and Risk Management, Cyber Risk, GRC and ITGRC, ALL Sector Analyst, Economics, Risk, Financials, Legal, Technology and Social Research #CFO #CIO #PM #BA #STEM

8 年

Cathy I am deeply interested in connecting new pathways to optimize cross functional value across Entity , Policy and Community lines. I work with unique lines of deep value to considering forthcoming changes on growth, risk and logistics of services in a manner of STEM approach. I am interested in finding a major Firm like Deloitte that can help fund and launch small pilot innovation teams to build knowledge utilization pods of cross value to Entity, Policy and Community value. In many ways these pods can help to strengthen opportunity pathways in a rapidly changing world. We should speak if you have budget to spare for embedded project lines aimed at optimizing the value at work aross entity (industry, ngo , non profit, gov) and societal needs. Knowledge + Application is a potent strategy to build on Fortune 500, SME + Innovation Teamwork. I can help and seeking comparatively modest growth budget to run teamwork aligned to high skills talent development on leadership chains of cross sector teamwork. Let's speak if we may. Dean you can learn more at www.dcarsoncpa.com The Core needs on Growth, Logistics and Risk are strong lines for forward development and I can help on innovation strategy in Context to Sector value + teamwork.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Cathy Engelbert的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了