Making concessions to close the deal, fast.

Making concessions to close the deal, fast.

Skilled negotiators prefer to trade rather than concede.

But when you are under time constraints, what can you do to close the deal?

A common rule in negotiating is that 80 per cent of the concessions occur in the last 20 per cent of the time remaining to negotiate. If demands are presented early in a negotiation, neither side may be willing to make concessions, and the entire deal might collapse. Conversely, supplementary demands arise in the last 20 per cent of the time, both sides are more willing to make concessions.

More often than not, you may encounter people who use this against you. They wait, until the last minute, and refrain from introducing the elements of the negotiation that could have been brought up earlier. So much so that when you’re getting ready to complete the deal these issues come up because they know you’ll be more flexible under time pressure.

What can we do when we have time constraints?

No alt text provided for this image

Make contingent concessions to encourage cooperation

The best way to arrive at an agreement is if each side learns about the interests and concerns of the other and makes good-faith efforts toward achieving joint gains. This is easier said than done. When trust is low or when you're engaged in a one-shot negotiation, it is advisable to truly consider making contingent concessions.

Label concessions

There are three ways to best label concessions. First, let it be known that what you have given up (or what you have stopped demanding) is costly to you. Second, emphasize the benefits to the other side. Third, don't give up on your original demands too hastily. If the other side considers your first offer to be trivial or meaningless, your willingness to move away from it will not be seen as concessionary behaviour.


Make concessions in instalments

While most of us prefer to get bad news all at once, we prefer to get good news in parts.

Most negotiators expect that they will trade offers back and forth several times, with each side making multiple concessions before the deal is done. Instalments may also lead you to discover that you don't have to make as large a concession as you thought. When you give away a little at a time, you might get everything you want in return before using up your entire concession-making capacity. Furthermore, making small concessions tells the other party that you are flexible and willing to listen to his needs. Each time you make a concession, you have the opportunity to label it and extract goodwill in return.

  1. Be wary! Don’t be uncomfortable with silence. Too often we fall into the trap of jumping to the gun to fill in the gaps or silence as we assume that the other party needs to be swayed more to get a reaction. Take your time and wait.
  2. Be Aware of the Effects of diminishing rates of concessions- Negotiators tend to offer lessening rates of concessions over the course of the negotiation. For example, when buying a car, initial discounts may start with a $1000 price drop and then go down as you reach the reservation price. Be aware that the other party might try to use this tactic to make you think their reservation price is approaching when it might not be the case.
No alt text provided for this image

Since 2005, Giuseppe Conti has been an award-winning Lecturer , recognized for his lively and interactive training workshops across a number of the leading business schools in Europe: Cambridge, EPFL, ESADE, HEC Lausanne, HEC Paris, IESE, IMD, Imperial College, INSEAD, London Business School, Oxford, RSM, SDA Bocconi, UBIS, University of Geneva and University of St Gallen.

More recently, he has become a Professor in Negotiation & Influencing. Giuseppe regularly runs negotiation workshops in four continents. Corporate leaders from multinational corporations and individuals from over 110 different countries have attended his workshops.


Alan Hustwick

Author - “Procurement: Redefined, Impactful, Compelling” and “Real Procurement Transformation - Powerful, Sustaining”. Consultant and Adviser.

3 年

An excellent article. As the article suggests it is a common “trap” for the skilled counter party negotiator to pick up the constraint of time to conclude a deal and force concessions. One to avoid! It goes back to the very start and ensuring you design the negotiation process to retain control from the outset - be clear on asks (....Commercial Award Criteria on how business will be granted), timeframes to conclude, define walk away position, who has authority to finalise the deal and importantly having a clear BATNA (= choice). Knowledge of the counter party and how keen they are for business (=hunger) should be known and if all fails, one can agree to say “time is no longer a constraint to ensure the best commercial deal. We have choice and we will re-approach the market and if you wish us to avoid that process, please revert to us within 72 hours (=play them at their own game!) to meet our “award criteria”. It would be important to emphasise the capability of the counter party, emphasise their skills to ensure they remain interested in the business. Alan.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了