Making CO? Capture Work for Indoor Growers: Bridging the Gap Between Sustainability and Affordability

The future of CO? enrichment doesn’t have to be a trade-off between sustainability and cost: it can be both.

Indoor farming is growing rapidly as the world seeks efficient, climate-controlled environments to produce food sustainably. A key component of indoor farming success is carbon dioxide (CO?) enrichment—boosting plant growth by increasing CO? levels in controlled environments. Today, most growers achieve this by using CO2 tanks or burning fossil gas. However, with an increasing awareness of carbon footprints and regulatory shifts toward sustainability, many growers are exploring alternatives like Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology.

At first glance, DAC seems like a perfect solution: capturing CO? from the ambient air and delivering it directly to plants without relying on fossil-based sources. It’s a futuristic and sustainable idea that excites growers. However, after the initial enthusiasm, many growers struggle with the economic feasibility of integrating DAC into their operations.

?

The Economic Dilemma: Cost vs. Sustainability

Most existing DAC technologies have been developed with large-scale climate goals in mind, especially when companies like Climeworks and Carbon Engineering are focused on capturing CO? at the gigaton scale to combat global emissions. These projects involve significant infrastructure and costs, making them impractical for small and medium-sized growers who operate on tight margins.

Indoor growers, while eager to participate in the decarbonization movement, must justify every investment. Their main concerns include:

• Upfront Costs: DAC systems are perceived as expensive, with higher initial investments compared to CO? tanks or fossil fuel-based solutions.
• Operational Expenses: Electricity consumption is a key factor, as traditional DAC units require significant energy to extract CO? from the air.
• Scalability & Adaptability: Growers question whether DAC solutions originally designed for large-scale applications can be made viable for smaller indoor farms.
• Reliability & Consistency: Will DAC be able to provide a stable and sufficient supply of CO?, especially when compared to the immediate availability of gas combustion or tank refills?

?

Making DAC Viable for Indoor Farming

While traditional DAC models may not be suitable for small-scale applications, innovative solutions are emerging. Companies like Direct Carbon are rethinking DAC for the controlled environment agriculture (CEA) sector by designing cost-effective, compact, and scalable systems that align with growers' needs. Here’s how:

• Right-Sized Technology: Instead of large industrial-scale capture, small-scale DAC systems are designed to capture only the amount of CO? an indoor farm needs daily.
• Energy Efficiency: Advancements in adsorption materials and modular designs have made it possible to run DAC units on minimal energy, reducing operating costs.
• Subscription-Based Models: Eliminating high upfront costs, a pay-as-you-go or subscription model makes DAC accessible to growers without significant capital investment.
• Circular Farming Benefits: By integrating DAC, growers contribute to decarbonization efforts while reducing dependence on fossil fuel-derived CO?, aligning their operations with future sustainability regulations.

?

A Role in the Decarbonization Story

One of the most common questions from indoor growers is: “How does my small farm contribute to a larger climate goal?”

The answer lies in collective impact.

While a single farm may not offset gigatons of CO? emissions, widespread adoption of DAC in the indoor farming sector can significantly reduce reliance on fossil fuels. This decentralized approach to carbon capture aligns with the broader movement towards net-zero emissions.

Moreover, as governments and industries push for more sustainable practices, early adopters of DAC will be well-positioned to benefit from potential incentives, carbon credits, and consumer demand for climate-friendly produce.

?

Conclusion: The Future of CO? in Indoor Farming

Indoor growers want to be part of the sustainability movement but need solutions that balance cost and impact. While DAC for large-scale emission reduction may seem distant from the needs of a small farm, innovative companies are now bridging the gap with tailored, affordable solutions. As technology evolves and the cost of carbon capture continues to decline, the transition from fossil-based CO? to air-captured CO? will become an economically viable and environmentally responsible choice.

We hope you enjoyed this edition of Direct Carbon X DAC. Don't miss out on the next one - subscribe today!