Make Train Safety A Prerequisite
Photo from the Official UK Report on the Virgin Train Derailment, February 2007

Make Train Safety A Prerequisite

One evening in February, 2007, a train with 105 passengers traveling from London to Glasgow derailed. The train, owned and operated by Sir Richard Branson’s company, Virgin Trains, was traveling at the authorized speed of 95 MPH when a faulty track switch caused it to jackknife and careen into a ditch. While many fatalities were expected, only one person died, an elderly woman who’d passed away from heart failure hours later in the hospital. Twenty-eight passengers and two (of the four) crew members were seriously injured. When Richard Branson arrived at the crash, only 11 remained in the hospital, none of whom had life-threatening injuries. The most seriously injured person was the train’s driver, who had a broken neck. A doctor who evaluated him said he would recover.

Some called the crash a ‘miracle’ because so few people died or were seriously injured. Yet it was no miracle. When Virgin Trains was first conceived, Branson and his team insisted on investing in every possible safety innovation. They wanted all passengers on a Virgin train to be able to walk away from a crash -- even if the train was traveling at full speed. As a result, Virgin Trains were designed with numerous safety innovations. Unusually strong one-piece aluminum structures were used for each carriage to prevent loss of survival space in the event of a crash. Interior lighting was made to stay on after an accident by using designated batteries, so people inside would be able to see after a crash. Couplers (linkages between carriages) were designed so that carriages would not ride up on top of each other, thereby hurting or killing passengers under them. Laminated carriage windows were created to prevent flying shards of glass from killing or injuring people. Branson said “The train is built like a tank. They perform beautifully and it has a system where we can check every part of it by computer.”

From studying train accidents, Branson and Virgin Trains knew that clear, coherent communication from train officials to the families and friends of passengers was often lacking after an accident. Branson and his team wanted to have an open, quick and honest communication style in the event of an accident. So when Branson heard about the accident, he immediately traveled from Switzerland to the crash site in England. Once there, he was able to meet with passengers, survey the damage and make a responsible, sensitive statement. He also met with the family of the woman who had died in the hospital.

A UK Rail Accident Investigation Board report on the accident identified twenty-nine safety recommendations, almost all of which were directed at the company that maintained the train tracks. Referring to the Virgin train, the report said, “While objective comparisons cannot be made because of the different trains, speeds and forces involved, overall, the crashworthiness performance of the [Virgin Train] avoided, almost completely, a number of hazards. These include multiple ejections through windows, loss of survival space and penetration of the passenger compartment by external structures, all of which have been known to cause fatal and serious injuries in the recent past.” In fact, no windows were broken and the carriages did not crumple as a result of the impact. Branson said, "I think if it had been any other type of train the injuries and mortalities would have been horrendous."

If you want the trust of your customers and a long-lived brand, Make Safety A Prerequisite in the design of your products and services.

Michael Wolf

Uncovering better ways ... by doing it and helping others do it.

6 年

https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/make-train-safety-prerequisite-joshua-kerievsky/ In the article @Joshua Kerievsky?said, "Some called the crash a ‘miracle’ because so few people died or were seriously injured. Yet it was no miracle." Likewise for US Airways Flight 1549/Airbus A320 that ditched in the Hudson River. A few years ago, Brian "Ponch" Rivera and Chris Alexander gave a talk at BeyondAgile in Seattle. After showing a multi-perspective replay of the less-than-three-minute flight, he showed a headline from the following day -- "Miracle on the Hudson". Brian asserted that the zero-casualty event was NOT a miracle. It _would_ have been a miracle if you or I landed that plane, however this ditching, was NOT A MIRACLE. It was an EXPECTED OUTCOME based on the design of the aircraft and the training of the crew. The massive NON-LOSS OF LIFE (in both the Virgin Trains derailment and the Airbus A320 ditching) was the result of a group of people asking "What if people could survive a spectacular derailment or ditching? What would need to be true for that to happen?". They imagined a future, then designed, and tested, and trained, and iterated us all into that future. Disney famously created the title of Imagineer. Because many of embody that role's vision and execution, we all get to live in the future.

Dave Rooney

Technical Excellence Coach | TDD/BDD, Refactoring, Testing, Ensemble Programming | Flow

6 年

We just "retired" a 2008 Toyota Sienna minivan that we bought new 10 years ago. We chose it over several competitors because Toyota had taken seriously the reports of serious shortcomings with their previous van, the Previa. After the IIHS has given the Previa a "poor" rating for safety in 1996, Toyota didn't challenge the findings but rather designed the Sienna from the ground up for safety in 1998. By the time we bought ours, it was pretty much the safest minivan if not overall vehicle on the road. So, making safety a prerequisite wasn't only good from a moral perspective, but also from a business one!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joshua Kerievsky ????的更多文章

  • A Joyful Idea for the Agile Community

    A Joyful Idea for the Agile Community

    Let me cut directly to the point: It's still the early days for agility. If you don't like some disturbing direction…

    15 条评论
  • Announcing My Forthcoming Book

    Announcing My Forthcoming Book

    I wanted to share some exciting news: I'm putting the finishing touches on a new book, called Joy of Agility. I don't…

    33 条评论
  • From Instance to Essence

    From Instance to Essence

    One day my friend, III, explained that there was a new name for an Open Space law I’d known for years. It was called…

    8 条评论
  • Example-Guided, A Brief History

    Example-Guided, A Brief History

    Over the last few decades, a family of practices emerged that share an example-guided heritage. This articles examines…

    8 条评论
  • Preconditions for Agility

    Preconditions for Agility

    Have you ever noticed recurring problems at the end of a sprint (i.e.

    5 条评论
  • Ask for the Moon

    Ask for the Moon

    If you've heard the phrase, "Meet people where they are" I invite you to get to know what I mean by, "Ask for the…

    6 条评论
  • Testing Like The King Of Pop

    Testing Like The King Of Pop

    In The Power of Broke, Daymond John, an entrepreneur and star on the hit show, Shark Tank, tells a fantastic story…

    4 条评论
  • Modern Agile Comedy

    Modern Agile Comedy

    I love seeing great comedians perform. The truly great ones can make me cry with laughter and keep me laughing…

    7 条评论
  • Norm Kerth's Safety Poll

    Norm Kerth's Safety Poll

    In 2001, a small green book was published by Norm Kerth, a deeply experienced software practitioner, colleague of…

    5 条评论
  • It's Both

    It's Both

    There's quite a bit of noise around perspectives that say "Do this" or "Do that" yet much of the time, I find that both…

    14 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了