Main contractors do not share the EOT Cost Claims with Subcontractors?
Ilamparithi BoologaSundaraVijayan
45K Followers | Expert International Contracts | Construction Claims | Disputes | Forensic Delay Analysis |Techno Legal | Arbitration | EPC | Oil & Gas | Power & Energy | Mentor | Key note Speaker | Author | Entrepreneur
Extension of Time (EOT) claims are essential mechanisms for adjusting project schedules due to unforeseen delays or circumstances. Similarly, Cost claims allow parties to seek compensation for additional expenses incurred during the construction process. Both EOT and Cost claims play vital roles in managing project deadlines, mitigating risks, and ensuring contractual compliance.
Roles and Responsibilities of Main Contractors
Main contractors shoulder significant responsibilities in construction projects, including project planning, coordination, and contractual management. They act as intermediaries between subcontractors and clients, holding primary responsibility for handling contractual matters such as EOT and Cost claims. This pivotal role underscores the importance of main contractors in navigating project risks, complexities and ensuring adherence to contractual obligations.
Subcontractor Arrangements and Agreements
Subcontractors contribute specialized skills and services to construction projects, often under subcontract agreements that delineate their scope of work and timelines. However, these agreements typically do not afford subcontractors direct involvement in contractual discussions with clients or main contractors. As a result, subcontractors may lack visibility into EOT and Cost claims, despite potential impacts on their work and financial obligations.
Absence of Direct EOT and Cost Sharing
The prevailing industry practice of main contractors not sharing EOT and Cost claims directly with subcontractors stems from various considerations. Firstly, it aligns with the hierarchical nature of contractual relationships, streamlining communication channels and avoiding potential disputes. Secondly, it reflects the primary responsibility of main contractors for managing project timelines and financial aspects, including EOT and Cost claims.
Risk Allocation in Contracts
Construction contracts distribute risks and liabilities among parties, reflecting the multifaceted nature of construction projects. Main contractors typically assume primary responsibility for managing EOT and Cost claims, given their overarching role in project coordination and contractual administration. This allocation of risk underscores the critical role of main contractors in navigating project uncertainties and ensuring project success.
Impact on Subcontractors
The absence of direct sharing of EOT and Cost claims can have significant implications for subcontractors. Without visibility into these claims, subcontractors may struggle to anticipate delays or budgetary impacts, potentially jeopardizing their ability to meet contractual obligations. Moreover, subcontractors may bear the brunt of financial penalties or compensation demands resulting from project delays or cost overruns.
Contractual Protections for Subcontractors
Subcontractors may seek contractual provisions to mitigate the impact of EOT and Cost claims and enhance transparency in project management. Provisions specifying notification requirements for EOT and Cost claims, as well as mechanisms for sharing relevant information, can provide subcontractors with greater visibility and accountability. Additionally, subcontractors may negotiate for clauses addressing compensation or cost adjustments in case of project delays or budgetary deviations.
Communication and Transparency
Clear communication and transparency are significant for fostering collaboration and addressing EOT and Cost-related challenges within project teams. Main contractors can enhance transparency by proactively communicating with subcontractors about project timelines, budgetary constraints, and any potential EOT or Cost claims. Collaborative approaches to problem-solving can mitigate disputes and promote shared accountability for project outcomes.
领英推荐
Alternative Approaches and Best Practices
While the standard practice may involve main contractors managing EOT and Cost claims independently, alternative approaches exist to involve subcontractors in discussions related to project timelines and finances. Engaging subcontractors in proactive planning, risk management, and cost control strategies can enhance project outcomes and strengthen relationships among project stakeholders. Best practices emphasize collaboration, open communication, and a shared commitment to project success.
For Claims and Contracts management services contact [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?????????? ???? ????????????:
???????????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????:
?????? ???????? ???? ?????? / ???????????????????????? ??????????????????:
Part#1: https://lnkd.in/dAtKF4XR
Part#2: https://amzn.to/3MZAlq9
?????????????????????? ??????????????????:
#constructionclaims #delayanalysis #SCL #Constructioncontracts #contractmanagement #claimsmanagement #Delayclaims #variationclaims
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Manager I Chartered Engineer I Professor of Practice I Advisor I Hydropower I PSP I Water I Tunnel I Cavern I Dam
9 个月Ilamparithi BoologaSundaraVijayan Very true fact but not always! It depends on many factors right from opportunity, know how, risk assessment capability. But the crux is, subcontractors who grew all these days have their own strategy and cannot be always evaluated by claims by the main contractor.
BSc in Civil Eng. (AAU),,MSc in Civil Eng.from Addis Ababa University, PMP?, Authorized Training Partner Instructor PMP
9 个月The sub contract agreement between the main contractor and the subcontractor should be detailed enough and fair in sharing risks of the project. In most construction contracts, the provisions of the contract document for the agreement between the client and the main contractor is made to be part and parcel of the subcontract agreement. in such cases the provisions of the conditions of contract that specifies the procedures and circumstances to claim for EOT and cost are applicable in the subcontract agreement and hence the subcontractor is entitled to claim in a similar conditions as the main contractor does from his client. Under such a circumstance there is a possibility for the subcontractor to share EOT and cost if he is able to prove delay and cost damage in the context of the contract.Therefore, the subcontractor should carefully scrutinize his agreement before signing the subcontract agreement to avoid problems that will later on popup during the Implimentation of the project.
Delivering Successful EOT Claims & Unlocking Full Contractual Entitlements | Protecting Contractors from Penalties | CEO @ Aegis | Three Decades in Contract Management, Delay Analysis & ADR Support
9 个月True that Ilamparithi BoologaSundaraVijayan but the LDs are definitely shared whether imposed or not ??