Is the Magic of Inspiration Making a Comeback?

Is the Magic of Inspiration Making a Comeback?

Are ideas digital or analog? What about inspiration?

I ask because I recently heard yet another “Digital First” presentation, and I was challenged to find any original idea at all in the very smart and fashionable deck shared with myself and the rest of the audience.

As I have written before, investors should run from marketing companies that speak in DIGIBABBLE (that is, Digital First), because until we humans become digital entities, our choices transcend technology.

And of course, there is the practical side to my argument. One of my frequent mantras is, “digital is everything, but not everything is digital,” meaning that digital technology is at the core of just about everything today, no matter if the final product presents itself as digital or otherwise.?

Bottom line, most everything that likes to present itself as “tech” today is simply an application of tech, but in and of itself, has broken no new tech ground.

All of which leads me back to the notion of ideas and inspiration.

A recent article I read about Gen Z freeing the world from e-mail made me wonder who was going to save the world from Zoom and iMessage and more importantly, what did one have to do with the other? Isn’t it the use case that’s important? How you use the product or service? How you leverage it to build ideas and inspire people, as opposed to merely freeing the world from its use?

It reminds me of an assignment I had, years ago, from one of the top global consulting firms. The project entailed interviewing their most important partners, with the goal of helping them better understand their brand and how to leverage it for new business. I’ll never forget when one partner told me, “I am nothing without my computer—we are nothing without our tech.”?

I was shocked—seriously. A firm known for its IP, bold thinking, game changing strategies and transformational ideas was reduced to a PC. That notion, needless to say, comprised a large portion of my report and presentation.

Let’s be clear and quiet the Knee Jerkers. Tech is an enabler. It always has been and always will be. A PC can help to accomplish a lot, but it isn’t going to make the difference in a company’s pursuit of clients or solutions—only people and ideas can, relationships and value-added thinking.

I’ve been particularly inspired over the past few weeks because both Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos made it into space on their private spacecrafts. In fact, I watched Richard Branson’s flight, while I flew (earthbound) to a business meeting.

As I quietly cheered him on from my Delta seat, I felt transported back to my younger self…standing on my grade school rooftop playground in Manhattan, with friends crowded around me to listen to John Glenn’s liftoff on my little transistor radio (the height of technology back then).

I was already bit by the space bug, it never left me. Over the years, though, it's been hard to sustain the awe and wonder of it all—the inspiration to look up and out, not just down and in.

Branson always looked up. His vision for Virgin was always huge and inspiring. My view is that people like him and Bezos and Musk don’t want to be remembered for a fashionable airline, a big store with quick delivery or for creating yet another fast car (electric or autonomous notwithstanding), which is why they’ve all jumped on the space bandwagon.

I know it’s easy to be cynical about it all. Billionaires competing over whose toy will get them to space first, quickest, furthest. But perhaps a more positive way of viewing it, as I choose to do, is that this renewed interest in space travel represents a potential renewal of our human desire to break the bounds of what limits us.?

We are in trouble if all we have to inspire the next generation is TikTok, Instagram and the Kardashians. We need more. We need to look up and out.?

Richard Branson said on his return:

“The whole thing it was just magical”

I’d like to think he was channeling the legendary author of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke, who wrote the following:

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”

It's time to get the magic back. To think about ideas and not just execution. To inspire and not just hype investment. To look up and out and not just down and in.

Because ideas are neither digital or analog—they’re magic.

What do you think?

Edna Kissmann, Social Entrepreneur

Founder and CEO at The Wonder of ME. Challenging Childhood Obesity.

3 年

David my friend, you have cheered me up and spurred me forward. I am in the midst of looking for investors who have the courage to support a pre-seed start up (The Wonder of Me) with the unusual idea that the route to controlling child obesity is by focusing on young children, 4-5 years old, who become masters of their own healthy food choices, and by extension, the advocates of healthy behaviours within the family. The magical ingredients here are 1. a determined positioning of health not as prevention of disease, a negative concept and highly irrelevant if you are 4 or 5, but health as the key to success in sports, learning and popularity (all matters close to the hearts of the youngsters). 2. a focus on engagement through the use of bespoke digital games that entertain while teaching and keeping the engagement going and 3. Adherence to behviour- change principles through entertaining and educational activities that reinforce the game and embed the habits for longevity. Yet, I find myself apologising continuously for the fact that " this is not a tech innovation, it is ONLY a new way of applying an existing technology to a new use". I hate this word ONLY. It feels like a cold shower as it takes away any pride in developing a new system with the potential to change both health and education delivery for good. From now on I will be channelling you when you state that "Tech is an enabler. It always has been and always will be. ... only people and ideas can (really make a difference) as do relationships and value-added thinking." Thanks for your intellect and your belief in the human capacity to ideate.

Aaron Schurg

Senior Consultant at Deloitte

3 年

I agree and unfortunately, I think "ideas" sometimes just get imperiled by modern ubiquity, monopolies and production values. It's like we have the ability to collaborate and communicate but we also have the ability to bully and beat down either on a conscious or subconscious level. I think of the 90's as a highly creative time period. The reason for this was because ideas and tech were still running neck and neck. Not everything had been monetized yet, the baby and bathwater were still in the bathroom, marketing polish was still pretty low. Maybe this is just "old guy shouts at clouds rhetoric".

Melanie A. Katzman, Ph.D.

#1 Wall Street Journal Bestselling Author; Business Psychologist; Corporate Strategist

3 年

Ideas are created between people and are the result of real connections. Thank you for challenging us to expand our minds and means of generating creative dialogue

Vadim Lovinsky

Personal Account

3 年

Thank you for sharing.

Shoshana Glass I MAICD

Board Advisor I Fractional CSO / CMO I Organic Growth Expert I Start-Up, SME, Mid-Cap, Enterprise I Australian & U.S. Experience

3 年

Brings to mind the concept of "ex nihilo.” What a superb insight to share with us David. Thank you.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Sable的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了