The Madness of the Machine
Why You Need a Unified Service Management System Before AI Eats You Alive
The boardroom was thick with the scent of desperation—executives clutching their frameworks like drunks gripping a shattered bottle of whiskey, convinced that polishing the outside would somehow make the insides less rotten. “Best practices,” they muttered. “Industry standards.” The exoskeleton of IT service management was gleaming like a showroom Ferrari.
But inside? Hollow. No bones. No structure.
This is the nightmare of the modern enterprise. The illusion of control. The fever dream of governance-by-checklist while the real beast—AI-driven chaos—lurks just beneath the surface, sharpening its teeth.
Let’s be clear: The only thing standing between you and an unmanageable, exponentially-growing tangle of AI-driven services is a universal, unified service management system. The skeleton. The bones. Without it, you’re just layering more and more exoskeleton on a jellyfish, hoping it will stand upright when the storm comes.
You May Be Focusing on the Wrong Thing
Enterprises love to talk about their operating model. They obsess over structure, processes, and governance models. They tinker with org charts and reporting lines, believing that somewhere in the rearrangement of boxes lies the secret to operational excellence.
But the operating model is just the visible layer—the exoskeleton.
What really determines whether an enterprise can function—whether it can adapt to change, absorb AI, and scale—is its management system.
An operating model describes how things should work. A vision. A design. A map of intent.
A management system is how things actually get done. The fundamental rules, processes, and dependencies that keep the lights on and the gears turning.
Many organizations don’t really even have a management system. They have a patchwork of frameworks, stitched together with hope and PowerPoint slides. They have teams operating in silos, following different playbooks, with no universal structure to integrate them. They confuse alignment with cohesion, governance with control, process with purpose.
This is why USM's Chief Architect keeps saying: "Stop Polishing the Outside"
You can slap a new coat of paint on your ITIL implementation, send your teams to DevOps training, and spin up an agile transformation initiative. It won’t matter. These are cosmetic changes. Frameworks are just tools, and without a solid foundation, they’re nothing but a collection of disjointed practices held together with policy documents and wishful thinking.
The real issue? You don’t have a system.
The Unified Service Management (USM) method is not another framework—it enables an underlying structure that allows frameworks to function. It replaces the endless cycle of practice adoption with a single, consistent approach to service management across the enterprise. It provides the bones—the internal structure—that everything else builds on.
AI is About to Make This Much, Much Worse
If you think complexity is bad now, wait until AI is embedded in every function of your organization.
AI thrives on unstructured data, LLMs, and vector databases—pure, raw information, swirling in vast digital reservoirs. This is the flesh of your enterprise. But flesh without a skeleton? Just a mess.
This is where graphs come in.
Graph-based control planes don’t just manage complexity—they interconnect domains into a coherent system.
Graph databases are exponentially more efficient at modeling and using dependency-centric IT management data, and if we don’t ensure that our respective graphs interoperate, we’ll just create new silos—this time powered by AI, infinitely faster and harder to untangle.
This isn’t just a technical shift—it’s an operating model transformation. AI, vector databases, knowledge graphs—these aren’t just tools, they are forces of nature. They will not be tamed by policy documents and polished frameworks.
It’s Time to Build a Spine
You need strong bones. The Unified Service Management method isn’t a best practice—it’s a survival mechanism. Ignore it, and AI won’t make you smarter. It will expose your weaknesses, exploit your inconsistencies, and accelerate your descent into chaos.
And when that happens, no amount of polishing will save you.
?
President & CEO at Internet Infrastructure Services Corp and founder of the ProCap360? platform
12 小时前John - you have a knack to simplify the complex and make it actionable. We have built a knowledge graph vulnerability visual solution that extends the process into the application software and release components down to the version number. We connect the machine readable "bones" to support faster vulnerability discovery and reduced mitigation time and effort. Our ProCap360 SaaS platform is available on AWS Marketplace and can visualize vulnerability scores in real time. Now let's amplify with USM.
Specialist in the Art of Failure
16 小时前John, you created a new genre: The Service Management Novelist. Thank you for this post!
Problem Solver | ITSM Professional
18 小时前John, this is a fantastic article and perspective! You’ve really got me thinking on some ways to make these points during conversations I find myself in around adherence to processes and frameworks and being unhappy with the results. I think you’ve nailed it - we are addressing surface level issues. Time to go deeper!
Information Technology Service Management Leader
1 天前Wow, talk about insight. I am going to absolutely put my ignorance out in the open. I think all of us have constructed very rudimentary maps of networks, servers, databases, etc. I never considered the value of a holistic knowledge graph of everything IT. The prospect of undertaking a project like that using traditional tool sets is daunting— and that may be understating it. But if we could use intelligent AI tools to not only construct these knowledge graphs, but also query them using prompts— that really opens up a very, very powerful tool. You gave me a lot to think about! Thank you
Global IT Service Management Leader | Enhancing Customer Experience & Business Outcomes through Technology Innovation
1 天前killer post!. The metaphor of a showroom Ferrari with no internal structure is spot on and suggests a focus on appearances over substance, which we have all seen, heard and felt. Nice work John