MADAM HONOURABLE MINISTERS PRESS BRIEFING

MADAM HONOURABLE MINISTERS PRESS BRIEFING

The newly appointed Federal Minister had come to office with three decades of outstanding private sector experience and a sterling track record of accomplishments that would rival her peers anywhere in the world. I was seated in the audience of her first Press Briefing, coming just five days after her appointment. As she got up to speak, my mind drifted away. I was deeply concerned that the new Minister would struggle and was at the risk of failing, even before she started. My concerns stemmed from optics and posturing of her stakeholders – anyone with an understanding of the Public Sector understands that it has a multifarious set of stakeholders whose interests are not aligned, thus, setting an agenda for the collective public good is a struggle to balance public, political and private interests. It is an issue that public leaders rise or fall on.

While the Private Sector creates value for its

shareholders through products and services that attract and keep customers, the

Public Sector creates value for its citizens and clients through public goods

(public services, projects and programmes) that need citizens needs, ensures

the welfare, security and safety of mass public and regulates all forms of

human harms.

I was privy to several of pre-press briefing

meetings with some of her stakeholders: At a meeting with Elders from her

hometown just the day before, a list of one thousand young unemployed members

of her community had been tendered to her to secure their jobs. The Elders also

wanted her to bring some specific Federal Projects to their town; Her religious

group, had already signaled her that her was now the Chair Lady of the

Committee for the Building of a New Place of Worship (for some reason the

budget had been reviewed upwards since her appointment); the myriad of Business

and Political Leaders that had lobbied for her appointment had also presented a

list of demands, and of course, there were the monumental challenges that the

Industry which under her oversight was facing. While it would have been easier

if her traditional, cultural, religious, professional, business and political

stakeholders, simply said to her to go and serve as best as she could the

common national good, this wasn’t and hardly is ever the case.

Therefore, in many cases of poor governance

the challenge is public interest and political interest are not aligned. In

other cases, political interest is driven by the private interest that lobbies

those in positions of power. It is this complexity that creates the challenges

that the Technocrat faces in governance. They become caught into pursuing

policies and programmes that play to their political base sometimes at the

expense of general good; they are continually constrained by the private

interests that have funded or supported the political enterprise that delivered

them to office; and they are literally held hostage by the political class that

pre-determined their emergence their election or appointment, as the case

maybe.

So, what should Madam Honourable Minister do?

How does she manage her stakeholders? Is there a road map for success?


Lauretta Asemota

Founder, CLEAN AND BEAUTIFUL ATMOSPHERE INITIATIVE (CABAIN Inc)

5 年

great to see you again, kudos!!!

回复
Tayo Aduloju

Chief Executive Officer @ NESG | Leading Economic Transformation in Nigeria

5 年

The public service is the institution that is meant to protect the public interest from the arbitrariness of political appointees. It is the essence of due process. Unfortunately, in a broken bureaucracy and derailed public service anything goes. After 43 attempts at reforming the public service in the last 20 years, all I can say is - there is the politicians dilemma, the public servants dilemma and the dilemma of the citizen who is forever chasing the evasive dividends of good governance.

回复
Tayo Aduloju

Chief Executive Officer @ NESG | Leading Economic Transformation in Nigeria

5 年

True. But our reality is political appointments will always have political interests. In many cases these interests are not aligned to the public interest. A political appointee may even be derailed completely when their mandate is totally influenced by the private interests of those that have the power to nudge their selection.

回复
Lameen Abdul-Malik

Nobel Peace Prize (IAEA) 2005 | Senior Advisor Roland Berger | CEO @ Honest Management | Founder 100ideascafe | Public Speaker | Coffeepreneur | Intellectual Philanthropist | Founder The Honest Network

5 年

Interesting. It reminds me of the politicians dilemma, whereby they can only choose two from; honesty, logical or political. In Nigeria they still have the state origin principle or should I say straitjacket. If this can be reviewed people will be appointed to help the nation. Otherwise it’s best not to be lobbied to get an appointment, which I should add cuts across all economies and organizations.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tayo Aduloju的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了