M K Gandhi a controversial figure

Hypocrisy of the highest order that political parties and leaders, particularly the Congress Party, the BJP in New Delhi and even the Aam Admi Party, making beeline to the dedicated memorial of M K Gandhi at Rajghat to pay obeisance respects. In retrospect, the key reason is simple. Even after 72-years, the legacy of M K Gandhi still maintains a blind spell over the psyche of Indians as the “MAHATMA”. If any political party or its leaders criticize legacy of M K Gandhi, they are doomed in the electoral outcomes.

Gandhi's birthday is on Oct 2,2019. No doubt there are public holidays and celebrations, solemn speeches and so on. A reappraisal of his contributions would also be very appropriate on that day. Please see Sri R Singh's discussion below. Also it will be proper to assess his role, in fact his contribution towards partition of India. The net has the following lament from a Hindu refugee from Pakistan who quotes Gandhi's son Ramadas Gandhi calling his father, ' a curse on Bharath'.

Gandhi a Curse to Bhaarath | Partition of India | Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhis son Ramdas Gandhi, castigated his father and said, your life has become curse for Hindu Jati.

The above story, a personal account by a refugee, Ashok Madan was by no means an isolated one. Gandhi himself confessed that he committed many 'Himalayan blunders'. And the nation is still paying for them. On Oct 2, an awakened nation hopefully apart from laying wreaths at his statues, also remembers those blunders so that they will not be allowed to be repeated -again, never again should there be a holocaust like partition for India.

Given the recent step of abrogation of article 370 along with hopefully rebuilding of Sri Rama temple soon in Ayodhya, will bring a qualitative change, a can-do spirit among people to make India great again.

Gandhi's son Ramdas Gandhi, castigated his father and said, your life has become curse for Hindu Jati.days and celebrations, solemn speeches and so on. A reappraisal of his contributions would also be very appropriate on that day. Please see Sri R Singh's discussion below. Also it will be proper to assess his role, in fact, his contribution towards the partition of India. The net has the following lament from a Hindu refugee from Pakistan who quotes Gandhi's son Ramadas Gandhi calling his father, ' a curse on Bharath'. h'.

On the ominous occasion of the Manhoos anniversary of MK Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, an imported White Elephant says that the Congress only follows the legacy of the DURATMA. Good for her!

This person of unique disgusting character set unprecedented examples of his worst psyche. He preferred to remain in his conjugal bed, when being repeatedly told that his father is breathing his last. Furthermore, He tests his sexuality and thus virility by sleeping naked with his young granddaughters.

Gandhi preferred to be and stayed with the millionaires and billionaires for his "spiritual" and political activities. So is Congress and Sonia two are a befitting example. Sonia is an implanted or imposed President of the Congress. This party cannot elect a Democratic President and have to depend upon this monster till another Qurbani ka Bakra or Manmohan Singh turns up or is created.

This "old" established party loves to stay in power as pigs love to be in the mire. Congress kills Gandhi almost every day, though Nathuram Godse opened NARAK DWAAR for him long time ago. This unscrupulous, stubborn party is "indeed" true to his legacy, when contrary to his instructions it has not dismantled itself so far.

Had Gandhi been a true (even false) PATRIOT, he would HAVE said, "We will defend the integrity of India, and FIGHT for every inch of her sacred soil till the last breath in our bodies." The entire nation was looking at him to say something to encourage or inspire them. For the Hinduus in Sindh, Lahore, East Bengal, Sylhet & Srinagar, Gandhi was the ONLY ray of hope for their survival.

What Gandhi did or said is known to the whole world. The proof of Gandhi's COLLAPSE is the border at Wagah instead of Khyber Pass, and "Hindu-Mukt" Srinagar!

As the top leader of Hinduus, much revered by the BRAINWASHED ENSLAVED Hindu nation, he had to INSPIRE, not go quiet in the hour of extreme peril. TENS OF MILLIONS OF HINDU LIVES, DIGNITY OF OUR DAUGHTERS, SISTERS & MOTHERS, and the future of Hinduusthan, were at stake!

Cost of that UNCONDITIONAL surrender of India, the Land of Sri Ram, Sri Krishna, Mahatma Buddha, Guru Nanak and Guru Gobind Singhji, that Gandhi ACCEPTED with a grumble, moan, sigh, regret and RESIGNATION?

Gandhi preferred to be and stayed with the millionaires and billionaires for his "spiritual" and political activities. So is Congress and Sonia to are a befitting example. Sonia is an implanted or imposed President of the Congress. This party cannot elect a Democratic President and have to depend upon this monster till another Qurbani ka Bakra or Manmohan Singh turns up or is created..

When the country got divided into THREE territorial fragments, her Muslims (SECOND NATION) too, got divided in three fragments. Only a "Gandhian cuckoo" will assure us that there will be NO repercussions, and "Partition will be followed by Ram Rajya!".

having escaped the "killing grounds" from where survival of a Hindu (and Sikh) was rated as one in a million chance!

Everyone has a different perspective of MK Gandhi. The spectrum goes from despicable coward and Imperial agent to "pujya" father of the nation. Thus the fact emerges that he was a most controversial figure. He is not on the illustrious podium like Maharana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Gobind Singhji and Netaji Bose.

All the virtues, piety and fame of an old venerated sadhu go immediately if the last act, or phase, of his life, was devious, dishonest, unethical, treacherous or immoral. LAST ACT is the crucial deciding factor, the litmus test, whether a person is honoured or condemned.

Let us look at the LAST acts of some revered souls in the past:

Sri Krishna. Did he suggest, or silently approve of, surrender by Pandavas before the Kauravas?

Did Sri Ram go on hunger strike or "fast unto death" to move the conscience of Ravana?

Jesus Christ. Did he apologise and repent before the Emperor of Rome to seek release from custody?

The two little (minor) sons of Guru Gobind Singhji when they were offered palaces and princesses if they embraced Islam and adored the Mohammed of Mecca instead of Guru Nanak of Talwandi?

What about the Czars of Russia when Napoleon captured Moscow, and later Hitler's army reached the outskirts of Moscow? Did they seek peace by surrendering vast territories?

And, what about Winston Churchill when the invasion of England was days away and he promised "blood, toil and tears" instead of seeking peace on Hitler's terms?

Now to MK GANDHI who is being celebrated by the IGNORANT & DEMORALISED nation of SLAVES or FOOLS. Following the example of the "Coward of Millennium" they do not even have the breath to utter just one word, "PARTITION!! Isn't it horrendous COVER UP, not to recall Sindh, West Punjab and East Bengal while "celebrating" the TOP leader of the time who was supposed to be OUR MAN in charge?

To put in nutshell:

When a serious threat emerged to the integrity and borders of Bharat, Gandhi, the TOP leader, lost his nerve. He became a pathetic nervous wreck seeking devious devices and cheap compromises like sharing power with the Muslims and having Muslim and Hindu prime ministers on rotational basis, and special job reservations for the Muslims.

All the virtues, piety and fame of an old venerated sadhu go immediately if the last act, or phase, of his life, was devious, dishonest, unethical, treacherous or immoral. LAST ACT is the crucial deciding factor, the litmus test, whether a person is honored or condemned.est Punjab and East Bengal while "celebrating" the TOP leader of the time who was supposed to be OUR MAN in charge?down to Wagah. TENS OF MILLIONS OF CITIZENS OF BHARAT FACED BLOODSHED while millions were killed, tens of millions took to all sorts of escape routes to survive. Gandhi's lackluster leadership proved LETHAL for the Hindu nation. In the hour of India's extreme PERIL, MK Gandhi was the biggest LIABILITY.

On August 14, 1947, Jinnah celebrated his victory- his conquest of one-third of India without firing a shot.

On August 15, 1947, Nehru shamelessly "celebrated" his defeat, while Gandhi was nowhere to be seen. He spent the night sulking and grumbling in his Bhangi Colony. Who delivered the speech: "At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom?" It should have been MK Gandhi, as the top leader ("Mahatma" and "father of the nation", etc.), to address the nation at that midnight!