Luring employee back to the office- what will it take?

Luring employee back to the office- what will it take?

This week, I write about a meaningful conversation with Dr. Peter Cavanaugh, a workspace expert, about how organizations should think about their employees returning to work from an office rather than continue working from home. Dr. Cavanaugh has led workplace transformation efforts- and is best known for his reimagination of GE's iconic learning facility in Crotonville, just outside New York City. 

Organizations are wrestling with how best to get employees back to the office. Reluctance from employees is obvious due to a complex set of issues, including different vaccination levels, childcare concerns as schools are not yet open in many parts of the world, the virus itself still being a clear and present danger. These are real issues- and often beyond organizational or employee control. If organizations enforce mandates on employees to return to the office, they are likely to face a backlash. 

Dr. Cavanaugh has advice on what the organizations control in this equation- and that is the physical workspace. He says that organizations can no longer rely on the historical model of the office. In the past, the office was the place you went to work. It was an anchor for work and vital professional relationships. As we go more and more hybrid, work gets done where the employee is, not where the office is. Office space, therefore, needs to be reimagined. 

He argues that the current discussion regarding office real estate as 'cost' is the wrong focus. Many organizations are looking at cutting real estate costs given that fewer people will work from an office space. He recommends that organizations, instead of cost savings, approach it as a chance to increase efficiency and effectiveness. Packing employees into 'cube farms,' forcing hot-desking and hoteling depersonalizes the environment and does not provide the right incentive for employees to get back. One study shows that employees lose 86 minutes of productivity every day due to distractions and noise in closely packed cubicles. Hoteling makes you feel like a guest rather than create a sense of belonging you want the employees to feel. 

He also feels that relegating the workplace discussion to the Facilities function creates a narrow and incomplete focus on the debate. He thinks that the things that are the easiest to measure-cost per square foot, # of people to be put in each space- are not necessarily the most important things to measure. They are contributors to the outcomes but not the outcome itself. The fundamental need of the hour is making employees wanting (not being forced) to come to the office. The new office space is likely to be where people come to recharge their sense of purpose and belonging, enhance their relationships with bosses and colleagues, and improve their connections with the culture, values, and beliefs. Work will get done anyway since work is anchored with the person, not at the office- but ensure that only the unique things mentioned above can happen at the office. The office should therefore be a powerful and welcoming experience. In other words, the future of the office space is less work-centric (since work can be done from anywhere) and more employee-centric. 

To make this conversion, Dr. Cavanaugh suggests that the workplace needs reconfiguring using a three 'H' framework:

  • The head (what you want people to think).
  • The heart (how you want people to feel).
  • The hands (what do you want people to do). 

In other words, the workplace should activate the employees' desires and aspirations. And to do this, ask them about their ideal office space, do not assume. For instance, if employees want to break down siloes, operationalize that desire by creating a transparent environment- where the floor plan allows for different functions/ departments to be integrated rather than separated. 

Dr. Cavanaugh suspects that there is a fundamental shift happening in our management model. Workplaces were designed for leaders to exert control, enforce conformity, and optimize for productivity. As we emerge from the pandemic, workplaces should symbolize inclusion, belongingness, unleashing energy, innovation, collaboration, and connection. If so, the workplace needs to be reimagined with those parameters in mind. For instance, a smattering of standing desks, sitting desks, bean bags, and an open personal space (where everyone pins their favorite photos - a common collage) could make the atmosphere more informal yet energetic. How about inspiration spots, concentration spots, coaching spots, fun-event spots, collaborations spots, innovation spots, private spots? And name them to symbolize the 'feel' aspect of the spot- the Newton spot (inspiration), the Marshall Goldsmith spot (coaching guru), Edison spot (innovation). Heck, you can even have venting spots or gossip spots. Keep in mind that space is a crucial aspect of culture. So, the artifacts, the photos, the carpets all matter. In other words, treat the workplace not as a cold, clinical, mechanistic beehive for worker-bees to churn out work, but as an unleashing of your culture- a place that activates it rather than constrains it. 

And finally, a word about safety. According to Dr. Cavanaugh, returning to the workplace will be about both physical safety and emotional safety. The tyranny of the virus is still not over, so masking, PPE, distancing...all are important. Even one person or one thing off the standard COVID safety protocol is a risk. Emotional safety is equally important- to offset the tyranny of the traditional workspace. The new workspace should engender trust, respect, connection, and belonging create an atmosphere of safety. That 'feel' is not going to happen by designing the physical space alone. For that, the culture needs to change. Office space cannot be a soul-crushing experience- it needs to be a soul-energizing experience.

In summary, Dr. Cavanaugh emphasizes that the concept of the physical workplace is not just utilitarian; it is not just functional; it is evocative, it is a symbol of organizational purpose and an embodiment of organizational culture. Space needs to be reimagined and curated for its intention. The employees will come back. Because they want to, not because they must.

Is this how your organization is thinking about a return to office space? 

Dr. Cavanaugh can be contacted at linkedin.com/in/peterfcavanaughedd

Vinod Palathinkara

Developing and executing strategies to engage health care providers with Philips brands, products and services.

3 年

Right on. Often people miss the first two 'H'; what do you want people to think and what do you want people to feel. In my previous work environment, one of the business made some changes in their work area that aligns with the ideas in the article. There was a visible difference in how people worked in that business.

回复
Madan Kulkarni

Hopitalty Transion Director at Red Sea Global Company , Saudi Arabia

3 年

Well said

回复
Helmut H. Meckelburg

Hotelier | Author | Mentor

3 年

If we like it or not, the home office is here to stay. Depending on the industry, the speed of transition will vary. However, there is no industry worldwide, which is not taking "justifiable" advantage of the pandemic in terms of cost reduction but also generational transition. A substantial difference exists in terms of geographical location. What is valid for North America or Europe is not necessarily valid for emerging countries in Africa or Asia. The fact is, a growing number of employees are facing a shrinking number of global employment opportunities. And companies will use this to their advantage. Only a small percentage of employees will have the luxury to choose a comany based on values and life priorities.

'Bukola ''Buks'' KOGBE -FCIPD

Global HR Leader | Board Director | Investor

3 年

Raghu Krishnamoorthy Thank you for bringing this topic to the fore. It is a one most business leaders are thinking about. While I agree with Dr. Peter Cavanaugh (Right on the varied factors influencing employee reluctance) I believe we need to dig deeper into the 3H model. Yes, the world as we know it has changed and as HR and business leads, we have to unlearn, adapt and be willing to try out new approaches. Employees will choose employers based on their values, life goals and priorities. The Head, Heart and Hands will need to be deeply cultivated to support current and future employee needs. We need to build new ecosystems that facilitate more collaborative opportunities for sustainable productive work from employees. With the pandemic, businesses have proved that remote work works for certain roles. (BCPs got adapted and realigned). Altogether, work itself and the work space needs to be inspiring and safe with a compelling reason to facilitate helping employees do great work in a particular location for now and in the future. Will return to read other comments. Again, thank you for opening this discourse.

回复
Lucia Ippolito

CTO & DT Operational Excellence

3 年

Very interesting…

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了