LOST IN SPACE: What Do Great Startups and Space Agencies Have in Common?

Both startups and space agencies face a plethora of options, akin to planets and bright stars in the vast expanse of the universe before them. But amidst this abundance, how do they choose where to focus their efforts?

Space agencies employ a range of criteria to prioritize their missions: scientific objectives, technological feasibility, cost considerations, planetary conditions, existing partnerships, and public interest, among others. Even with these criteria, they must be selective. NASA, for instance, has set its sights on Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, and the Kuiper Belt, bypassing countless other celestial bodies.

The analogy with startups is clear. The quality and uniqueness of a startup's technology directly correlate with the number of potential market opportunities, akin to having many shiny stars and planets in their entrepreneurial galaxy. However, the uniqueness of the tech alone does not guarantee success.

Only a select few startups who have a unique tech advantage ascend to greatness. Why? Because they don't get LOST IN SPACE, attempting to navigate too many stars and shiny objects (opportunities) simultaneously and ultimately running out of fuel—cash. They spread themselves thin, lacking the resources to reach any of their aspirational destinations.

So, what sets apart great startups from the rest? They prioritize. They filter out the distractions, focusing their limited resources (fuel) on a select few stars or planets—market opportunities—that truly align with their vision and mission.

Here's how they do it:

1. Strategic Discipline: Great startups rigorously evaluate their strategic options, passing up opportunities that don't meet their criteria.
2. Organizational Commitment: Once they've made a choice, they stick with it, avoiding the temptation to chase every fleeting opportunity.
3. Market Sensitivity: They remain attuned to market and technological changes, adjusting their course only when necessary.

In my experience, great startups employ the following criteria to navigate their options and maximize their available fuel:

• Market Size and Opportunity: How sizable, accessible, concentrated, and referenceable is the market and can it be easily influenced?
• Repeatability: Can the product or service needed for this opportunity be replicated and reused effectively?
• Differentiation: Does this opportunity offer a unique advantage over competitors, such as a network effect, category leader or first-mover advantage?
• Barriers to Entry: How difficult is it for others to enter the same market, and can the startup establish barriers to competition?
• Scalability: How quickly can the startup expand its reach, and are there existing resources or partnerships that facilitate scaling?
• Time: What is the time horizon for reaching the target market, and how does it align with the startup's objectives (the shorter the better)?
• Risk Mitigation: What are the potential risks along the journey, and how can they be mitigated?
• Vision Alignment: Does the target market or opportunity align with the startup's long-term vision and mission?

By adhering to these criteria and maintaining focus, startups who have unique or great tech can chart a course through the vastness of opportunities to GREATNESS, avoiding the pitfalls of getting LOST IS SPACE.

I would love to hear your thoughts and feel free to tag someone in a comment who you think would find the post interesting.

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?