Are LLMs the new IP layer in need of TCP?

Are LLMs the new IP layer in need of TCP?

Ever wonder how the internet keeps everything flowing smoothly? It’s all about layers working together. At the heart of it, there’s the network layer (layer 3), like IP, which handles routing data from point A to point B. But it doesn’t work alone — it relies on the transport layer (layer 4), like TCP, to manage connections, retries, and ensure everything arrives intact.

Now, let’s talk about Large Language Models (LLMs). They’re becoming the backbone of many systems, kind of like the new network layer in our tech world. LLMs process and generate human-like text, enabling machines to understand and communicate with us more naturally.

Working with the unpredictability of LLMs in code feels very similar to network programming. You often need to implement retries, apply backoff strategies, and occasionally add transaction identification to ensure consistency. I wouldn’t be surprised if this evolves into a formal layer.

But here’s the thing: while LLMs are powerful, they don’t inherently handle things like failovers, retries, or efficient routing of tasks. Just as IP needs TCP to ensure data gets where it needs to go reliably, LLMs need an equivalent “transport layer” to manage these operational details.

Imagine interacting with an AI assistant, and suddenly it goes blank because of a hiccup. Without a system to handle retries or reroute the request, the experience falls flat. A dedicated layer on top of LLMs could manage these issues — handling errors gracefully, retrying failed operations, and maintaining smooth communication.

Developing this “LLM transport layer” would make interactions more reliable. It could monitor the health of different LLM instances, route requests to the best-performing ones, and manage the flow of information to prevent bottlenecks.

In essence, while LLMs are revolutionizing how we interact with technology, they need that extra layer to truly shine in complex, real-world systems. By building protocols and tools that handle the nitty-gritty — like retries and failovers — we can ensure that the AI systems of the future are not just smart, but also robust and dependable.

So, could this be the next big step in AI development? Crafting a transport layer for LLMs might just be what we need to take full advantage of their capabilities, ensuring smooth and reliable interactions in our increasingly AI-driven world.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Laurent LATHIEYRE的更多文章

  • A. Maslow & the Siksika Tribe

    A. Maslow & the Siksika Tribe

    Did you know that Abraham Maslow spent six weeks living at Siksika(Blackfoot) in Alberta, Canada in the summer of 1938?…

  • Man or Bear –?The Final Take

    Man or Bear –?The Final Take

    #NotAtechPost #ManOrBear #Bear As a dad to three daughters, I recently became intrigued by the "Man or Bear?"…

  • Mistral Gagnant: Microsoft partners with MistralAI

    Mistral Gagnant: Microsoft partners with MistralAI

    The announcement by Eric Boyd – CVP Azure AI Platform, Microsoft – mentions a multi-year partnership that will enables…

  • Objects In The Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer To Tomorrow

    Objects In The Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer To Tomorrow

    Objects In The Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer To Tomorrow Learning from Past & Present Perils to Navigate the…

  • The LLaMa — with a beak and fins…

    The LLaMa — with a beak and fins…

    In Monty Python’s Flying Circus Episode Nine, “The ant, an introduction”[1], the llama is a quadruped which lives in…

  • French Innovation in the American Pacific North West?

    French Innovation in the American Pacific North West?

    Do you know anyone with a connection with France or the francophone community? If so, please contact me for more…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了