LIVE NOT BY LIES
Mrs. Susan Pavan, M.AJourn
Independent Publisher @ Trumpet Publishing House | MA in Journalism
Mr Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn was a Russian and historical novelist. One of the most famous Soviet dissidents, Mr Solzhenitsyn, a critic of communism helped to raise global awareness of political repression in the Soviet Union, in particular the Gulag system.
On the day Mr Solzhenitsyn was arrested, February, 12, 1974, he released the text of “Live Not by Lies.” The next day, he was exiled to the West, where he received a hero’s welcome.
This moment marks the peak of his fame.
Mr Solzhenitsyn equates “lies” with ideology, the illusion that human nature and society can be reshaped to predetermined specifications.
And his last word before leaving his homeland urges Soviet citizens as individuals to refrain from cooperating with the regime’s lies. Even the most timid can take this least demanding step toward spiritual independence. If many march together on this path of passive resistance, the whole inhuman system will totter and collapse.
-- by Edward E. Ericson, Jr. and Daniel J. Mahoney,?The Solzhenitsyn Reader
(Image: 25 APRIL 1925. Four years earlier, a young Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn was photographed with a teddy bear.)
There was a time when we dared not rustle a whisper.
But now we write and read?Samizdat?(the secret publication and distribution of government-banned literature in the former Soviet Union) and, congregating in the smoking rooms of research institutes, heartily complain to each other of all?they?are muddling up, of all?they?are dragging us into!
There’s that unnecessary bravado around our ventures into space, against the backdrop of ruin and poverty at home; and the buttressing of distant savage regimes; and the kindling of civil wars; and the ill-thought-out cultivation of Mao Zedong (at our expense to boot)—in the end we’ll be the ones sent out against him, and we’ll have to go, what other option will there be? And they put whomever they want on trial, and brand the healthy as mentally ill—and it is always “they,” while?we?are—helpless.
(Image: FEBRUARY 1943.?FEBRUARY 1943.?BATTERY COMMANDER A. SOLZHENITSYN AND COMMANDER OF ARTILLERY RECONNAISSANCE DIVISION?E.?PSHECHENKO.?While serving in the Red Army, Mr Solzhenitsyn criticises Joseph Stalin in private correspondence to a friend. He is arrested and punished with an eight-year sentence in the Gulag labor camps.)
We are approaching the brink….
“But what can we do to stop it? We haven’t the strength.”
We have so hopelessly ceded our humanity that for the modest handouts of today we are ready to surrender up all principles, our soul, all the labors of our ancestors, all the prospects of our descendants—anything to avoid disrupting our meager existence. We have lost our strength, our pride, our passion. We do not even fear a common nuclear death, do not fear a third world war (perhaps we’ll hide away in some crevice), but fear only to take a civic stance! We hope only not to stray from the herd, not to set out on our own, and risk suddenly having to make do without the white bread, the hot water heater, a Moscow residency permit.
We have internalised well the lessons drummed into us by the state; we are forever content and comfortable with its premise: we cannot escape the?environment,?the social conditions; they shape us, “being determines consciousness.” What have we to do with this? We can do nothing.
(Image: MOSCOW, JUNE 1946.?As prisoner on a construction site near Kaluga Gate.)
But we can do—everything!—even if we comfort and lie to ourselves that this is not so. It is not “they” who are guilty of everything, but?we ourselves,?only?we!
Some will counter: But really, there is nothing to be done! Our mouths are gagged, no one listens to us, no one asks us. How can we make?them?listen to us?
To make them reconsider—is impossible.
The natural thing would be simply not to reelect them, but there are no re-elections in our country.
In the West they have strikes, protest marches, but we are too cowed, too scared: How does one just give up one’s job, just go out onto the street?
All the other fateful means resorted to over the last century of Russia’s bitter history are even less fitting for us today—true, let’s not fall back on them! Today, when all the axes have hewn what they hacked, when all that was sown has borne fruit, we can see how lost, how drugged were those conceited youths who sought, through terror, bloody uprising, and civil war, to make the country just and content. No thank you, fathers of enlightenment! We now know that the vileness of the means begets the vileness of the result. Let our hands be clean!
(KOK-TEREK, SPRING 1954, exiled teacher of mathematics...After completing his prison sentence, Solzhenitsyn is forced into exile in Kok-Terek, Kazakhstan. When he's not busy teaching, he writes in earnest in secret, including his first novel,?In the First Circle. He receives treatment in Uzbekistan for cancer, which was expected to kill him in three weeks’ time; he survives.)
So has the circle closed? So is there indeed no way out? So the only thing left to do is wait inertly: What if something just happens?by itself?
But it will never come unstuck?by itself,?if we all, every day, continue to acknowledge, glorify, and strengthen it, if we do not, at the least, recoil from its most vulnerable point.
From lies.
When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance, it displays on its banner and proclaims: “I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!” But violence ages swiftly, a few years pass—and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally—Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. And it is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit—and this suffices as our fealty.
And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a?personal non-participation in lies!?Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold?not through me!
And this is the way to break out of the imaginary encirclement of our inertness, the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies. For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.
We are not called upon to step out onto the square and shout out the truth, to say out loud what we think—this is scary, we are not ready. But let us at least refuse to say what we?do not?think!
(Image: MEZINOVKA VILLAGE (NEAR VLADIMIR), 1956?MATRYONA'S HUT.?Sentences passed under Article 58 of the Penal Code are rescinded in the wake of Krushchev's denouncement of Stalin. Solzhenitsyn moves to the Vladimir region, finds a teaching position, and rents a room from Matryona, a widow he immortalises in?Matryona's Home.)
This is the way, then, the easiest and most accessible for us given our deep-seated organic cowardice, much easier than (it’s scary even to utter the words) civil disobedience à la Gandhi.
Our way must be:?Never knowingly support lies!?Having understood where the lies begin (and many see this line differently)—step back from that gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scales of the Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.
(Image: WRITING?ONE DAY IN THE LIFE OF IVAN DENISOVICH?AT THIS SELF-MADE TABLE, IN THE YARD OF THE RYAZAN BUILDING WHERE HE LIVED FROM 1957 TO 1966, ONE DAY IN THE LIFE OF IVAN DENISOVICH WAS WRITTEN IN MAY 1959. In 1961 Solzhenitsyn submits to the literary journal?Novyi Mir?a short story he wrote two years prior,?One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. It is published in 1962 to worldwide acclaim.?In the following years he produces several important new works as the political landscape intensifies after Khrushchev's removal from power. )
领英推荐
And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: Will he remain a witting servant of the lies (needless to say, not due to natural predisposition, but in order to provide a living for the family, to rear the children in the spirit of lies!), or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries? And from that day onward he:
· Will not write, sign, nor publish in any way, a single line distorting, so far as he can see, the truth;
· Will not utter such a line in private or in public conversation, nor read it from a crib sheet, nor speak it in the role of educator, canvasser, teacher, actor;
· Will not in painting, sculpture, photograph, technology, or music depict, support, or broadcast a single false thought, a single distortion of the truth as he discerns it;
· Will not cite in writing or in speech a single “guiding” quote for gratification, insurance, for his success at work, unless he fully shares the cited thought and believes that it fits the context precisely;
· Will not be forced to a demonstration or a rally if it runs counter to his desire and his will; will not take up and raise a banner or slogan in which he does not fully believe;
· Will not raise a hand in vote for a proposal which he does not sincerely support; will not vote openly or in secret ballot for a candidate whom he deems dubious or unworthy;
· Will not be impelled to a meeting where a forced and distorted discussion is expected to take place;
· Will at once walk out from a session, meeting, lecture, play, or film as soon as he hears the speaker utter a lie, ideological drivel, or shameless propaganda;
· Will not subscribe to, nor buy in retail, a newspaper or journal that distorts or hides the underlying facts.
(Image: SPRING 1974?MR SOLZHENITSYN’S SMUGGLED ARCHIVE HAS ARRIVED SAFELY!?)
This is by no means an exhaustive list of the possible and necessary ways of evading lies. But he who begins to cleanse himself will, with a cleansed eye, easily discern yet other opportunities.
Yes, at first it will not be fair. Someone will have to temporarily lose his job. For the young who seek to live by truth, this will at first severely complicate life, for their tests and quizzes, too, are stuffed with lies, and so choices will have to be made. But there is no loophole left for anyone who seeks to be honest: Not even for a day, not even in the safest technical occupations can he avoid even a single one of the listed choices—to be made in favour or of either truth or lies, in favour or of spiritual independence or spiritual servility. And as for him who lacks the courage to defend even his own soul: Let him not brag of his progressive views, boast of his status as an academician or a recognised artist, a distinguished citizen or general. Let him say to himself plainly: I am cattle, I am a coward, I seek only warmth and to eat my fill.
For us, who have grown staid over time, even this most moderate path of resistance will be not be easy to set out upon. But how much easier it is than self-immolation or even a hunger strike: Flames will not engulf your body, your eyes will not pop out from the heat, and your family will always have at least a piece of black bread to wash down with a glass of clear water.
Betrayed and deceived by us, did not a great European people—the Czechoslovaks—show us how one can stand down the tanks with bared chest alone, as long as inside it beats a worthy heart?
(Image: 29 MARCH 1974?MR SOLZHENITSYN GREETS HIS FAMILY AT ZURICH AIRPORT.?CREDIT: SVEN SIMON.)
It will not be an easy path, perhaps, but it is the easiest among those that lie before us. Not an easy choice for the body, but the only one for the soul. No, not an easy path, but then we already have among us people, dozens even, who have for years abided by all these rules, who live by the truth.
And so: We need not be the first to set out on this path, Ours is but to join! The more of us set out together, the thicker our ranks, the easier and shorter will this path be for us all! If we become thousands—they will not cope, they will be unable to touch us.
If we will grow to tens of thousands—we will not recognise our country!
But if we shrink away, then let us cease complaining that someone does not let us draw breath—we do it to ourselves! Let us then cower and hunker down, while our comrades the biologists bring closer the day when our thoughts can be read and our genes altered.
(Image: NOBEL PRIZE AWARD CEREMONY. STOCKHOLM, 10 DECEMBER 1974. In 1974, Mr Solzhenitsyn is arrested, charged with treason, and expelled to West Germany.?A few weeks later his family is allowed to join him in Switzerland.?He is finally able to receive his 1970 Nobel Prize in Literature in December 1974.??CREDIT: JAN COLLSI??.?? PRESSENS BILD AB)
And if from?this also?we shrink away, then we are worthless, hopeless, and it is of us that Pushkin asks with scorn:
Why offer herds their liberation??
.....................
Their heritage each generation
The yoke with jingles, and the whip.
February 12, 1974
Acting/Directing/Writing/Pianist
2 年Thank you Susan … much appreciated ????
Learning^Development Adviser * Spectre Industries | Head of Complaints * Independent Wellness Consultant | Engineer * Integrated Process Cooling Systems
2 年?????? ?? Thank you dear Susan ?? For connecting recently too https://photos.app.goo.gl/hCPfaK2aggBJzpnc6
Doctor of Philosophy in World Languages and Cultures, University of Utah
2 年Solzhenitsyn's writing perfectly describes ersatz Western democracies, about which George Orwell warned us in the 1940s. Compare Solzhenitsyn's critique to Orwell's (still ) unpublished preface to his Animal Farm "The Freedom of the Press," In this country, intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a writer or journalist has to face, and that fact does not seem to me to have had the discussion it deserves." (1945). The difference is, there is no place to exile from our corporate tyranny like Solzhenitsyn did in the 1970s... The only reason Solzhenitsyn is celebrated in the West is that he criticizes the Soviet Union. By contrast, Orwell's preface was only published 30 years later by the Times Literary Supplement, and one more time by the Penguin in their 2000 edition in the Appendix of his book, not as a preface.
Flexible Housing Estates Advocate
2 年Great article from a fantastic book. Highly recommend taking the time to read it, it's an investment!
Property Manager at Holt Lunsford Commercial
2 年Thank you for sharing! Excellent article