Liquidity Risk – The Intriguing Treatment of Covered Bonds as HQLA
Babu Sathyanarayanan
AVP, Liquidity Risk Transformation at Barclays | Formerly HSBC & BNY Mellon | 7.7K+ Followers
"Dear Followers,
Your feedback is invaluable to me, so if you find this piece insightful and would like to see more content like this, please share your thoughts in the comments section.
Looking forward to your engagement!"
Context: In our earlier article, we explored the significance of High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) in bolstering the financial system’s resilience during economic downturns. We also emphasized the need for banks to maintain sufficient levels of HQLA to meet regulatory standards.
Link to the earlier article,
Exclusivity of 'Covered Bonds':
Banks hold various financial instruments as liquid assets, which are categorized into three levels based on their quality.
However, not all types of instruments can be maintained across all levels—specifically, Level 1, Level 2A, and Level 2B. An exception to this rule is “Covered Bonds,” which can be classified across these levels, albeit with a complex classification process.
Let’s first explore their characteristics before delving into the process breakdown.
Dual recourse:
2. Priority Claim:
3. Claim Against the Insolvency Estate:
Transparency:
领英推荐
Background:
The Covered Bond Directive (CBD) and an associated regulation have substantial implications for the risk weighting and eligibility of covered bonds within the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) framework.
While the CBD necessitated adoption into national legislation by member states’ legislators, the regulation - incorporating modifications to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) in the context of covered bond harmonization - became effective immediately on July 08, 2022.
Treatment in LCR:
The Delegated Regulation outlines requirements that are relevant to the EEA (European Economic Area). Additionally, it distinguishes between covered bonds issued within the EEA and those issued by entities from third countries. Here are the key points:
EEA bonds can generally be classified as both Level 1 assets and as the two subdivisions of Level 2. They enjoy flexibility in their classification.
2. Covered Bonds from Third Countries:
Covered bonds issued by entities from third countries can only be assigned to Level 2A if they meet the eligibility criteria as LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) assets.
The following mapping offers a clear understanding of how they are reported in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR),
Abbreviations:
RWA – Risk-Weighted Assets
CRR – Capital Requirements and Regulation
OC – Over Collateralization
UCITS - Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities
EEA – European Economic Area
The 2021 list of third countries and territories referred to in Article 2 is as follows:
(1) Australia (2) Brazil (3) Canada (4) China (5) Hong Kong (6) Indonesia (7) Japan (8) Mexico (9) South Korea (10) Saudi Arabia (11) Singapore (12) South Africa (13) USA
#LiquidityRisk #HQLA #Basel3 #Haircut #LCR #RWA #CoveredBonds #Regulatorycompliance #Regulatoryrequirement #Regulatoryreporting
Independent Contributor
11 个月Isn't it the same securitisation which is now being renamed? It still doesn't resolve the core issue which caused sub prime crisis. Hence not sure if the collateral are really being scrutinized.
Principal Consultant - Banking @ Infosys | Product Ownership, Process Optimization
11 个月Interesting. How do you account for Time as transitory factor in value of those bonds ? Do you consider PIT or any other way ? How are bonds evaluated as? FFS? Or HTM ?
Manager | EY FSRM | Ex Societe Generale | Liquidity Risk
11 个月Thanks for this information. Does this flowchart cover basic characteristics of HQLA like Liquid and readily marketable etc ?
Senior Manager - SCB IRRBB/LR | ex- SocGen | ex-GS | All-Rounder Medal Holder MBA| Alteryx Designer Core Certified
11 个月This is a well articulated article.